Narnia

Judas....explain that one Brum.

Priest???????

I think it's most people being just plain ignorant. What happened to manners? Though last year I did witness an unfortunate incident on a bus where everyone started giving a young guy abuse when he didn't offer his seat to an elderly lady. It turned out the fellow was blind and had no idea what was going on. There were a few embarressed people on the bus.

Once is understandable but twice is deliberate. stone

I watched that too on iPlayer and quite enjoyed it. I've no preconceptions as to who Amstell is but having read what's above I see he is the main character. I thought he was good.

Oh heck, doesn't behave like one elsewhere. An upgraded version maybe or should it be Father Rubsley? Over

Less.........a troll............I'm way behind

brum Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Abandon I'm lost........what's the link Brum?

Nice RD, that made me smile.

Ah well, that's 1-0 to me then!

Did you edit that just to add 'ever'?

Ents, no doubt!

I don't know about an optimum age Mick, but definitely the optimum day has got to be tomorrow.

I don't know why this is bugging me but this season there are 4 teams in the PL whose names begin with a W. Has this ever happened before even in the old 1st Division, with any letter? Any minefield of useless information out there?

Bl**dy hell rubsley........you might start a war!

Were you preparing to wash down the horses LM? (off topic I know)

What a mean thing to do.

Short of what?

I really don't know why you wrote this Sean given you made it obvious that you supported the former in other posts. As for your comment regarding 'wrong un's' whoever/whatever they are, they would be banned it they were so wrong. Regarding the puerile nonsense that both you Jah dislike but admit to writing in the past, the simple answer is is not to read it. It's so puerile, Jah has had to post his comment in two places. Why bother? You mentioned the good old days in a post, where none of this type of stuff would happen, I presume. Well those were then and this is now. There are always people joining the forum and others leaving. You may not like what they write but so long as they stay within boundaries then there is nothing you can do about it apart from comment on it. You generally do this with subtle sarcasm. The dislike of some posters by others is in my opinion a form of snobbishness. Lots of the written word on here is not worth reading and certainly not as funny to me as the posters might think they are. However the high and mighty stance by the old guard is just as bad, if not worse. The above appearance of backslapping in the mode of anguished parents worried about their offspring but somehow feeling a bit comforted in each others company and probably after a jar or two is a bit pathetic. As Ed... said on the other thread, this is not a real world for many posters and that applies to me too. I don't know anyone personally. So I've resorted to imagining who posters might be like in another unreal world, TV. Thus Father Ted comes to mind when I read the above posts. You've got to be Ted, Sean. That air of authority in a big house on the small Craggy Island fits the bill. Jah could only be Father Jack. He'll complain if he's not given a drink. As for Admin, well with a mindboggling response like 'well said', he's gotto be Dougal! You can decide amongst yourselves who Mrs.Doyle is! Of course the above should not be taken offensively please as it's my favourite comedy of all time. So please don't. To paraphrase something Willie John McBride once said, I'm 'getting my apology in first'.

Ladymuck Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Narnia...it was lesian...not lesion...I suspect > there is a difference between the two (or maybe > not since I haven't a clue what the former refers > to) The former LM is a lesbian without a 'b'. Whatever THAT might be.

........that's an interesting concept in the light of that other thread. The 'owner' of that thread hadn't posted there for almost a year and not only that isn't a lesbian or a lesian (though I can't be certain about the latter). Therefore it's her thread and anyone who complains about the posts are mere squatters. Thus anything should be allowed until she says it's not. Do lesbians like boobs given they have their own? Edited to correct a spelling error of a typing one I think

I would say whatever flow there is in the Lounge it's one that can take you anywhere on any thread. That's the point in the Lounge. It doesn't spoil anything that can't have a home elsewhere in the forum if it's a serious subject.

In which case should this thread not be in the ED specific section and not the Lounge? Most threads go 'off topic' fairly quickly in here which is half the point of being in the Lounge is it not?

Not harsh at all Moos. WOD did say her concern was him going to Uni but that changed to not giving a hoot how much he slept so long as he answered the door. This means getting out of bed and if you read the thread in the lounge today you will see it's not just teenagers who are fond of staying in bed! When he's gone I'm sure WOD will miss knowing he's at home asleep, just like I will.

You posted number 400 and didn't claim it?