nxjen

Before that he worked in Emily's Fish Bar in North Cross Road.

This looks like the same problem that was occurring earlier in the year which is said to have been rectified though clearly there is still something wrong. http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,1272263,1273117#msg-1273117

jack_G_S Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- "Seems like you wanted an argument to begin with!" Surely not!

PohSuan Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think the craziest cyclists I have seen recently > are parents riding on busy roads with tiny babies > in slings.I had to do a double take as couldn't > believe my eyes at first. Whenever I see young child in a special child seat at the back of a bicycle I get very nervous, they look so exposed and vulnerable.

northdulmum Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > UK inflation cooling more than forecast so rates > likely to remain low for longer. > > Plus there's the election... A lot of the electorate would like to see interest rates rise.

Can anybody explain how binding the infrastructure plan for London is? I mean, it looks almost certain there will be a new mayor in office in 2016 - are they obliged to adhere to the Plan launched recently by Boris or can they bin it and pursue a different strategy?

There are a few direct trains going to Wimbledon from ED already first thing in the morning. I think there used to be a lot more a few years ago. What's a ticket gateline?

Been happening for centuries. The annual May Fair held in, er, Mayfair was closed partly due to complaints from the toffs who had moved into their newly built mansions in the early 18th century about the noise and debauchery. However as regards noise from The Patch, it seems clear that the conditions for their license are being breached.

A planning application for this site has been discussed before though for more dwellings. http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1220753,page=1 As Jeremy says, what sort of disruption do you think it will cause to users of the Leisure Centre?

Thanks for info. East Dulwich residents very inquisitive? Surely not!

...

Boris Johnson has launched a public consultation for a London Infrastructure Plan that includes proposals for an extension to the Bakerloo line ... for the year 2040. http://www.london-se1.co.uk/news/view/7757

Good to see the post from mrsc_89. With some exceptions, it is rare to see a post that's considered and balanced, lacks hysteria or drama, and doesn't pick up on another's grammatical etc shortcomings.

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm loving the use of the term "indiginous > people". I was born in Dulwich, and it used to be > great when we could hunt freely and sing our songs > around the fires. > > Then all you @#$%& came in and built your houses > and penned us in to reservations in Penge. LOL

..

"Property News" style seems very familiar ...

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > It still expects 15% of customers to arrive by > tube! > Flats will put all their waste beside 1 > Chesterfield Grove - separate land not owned by > the developer. > If the application has got these points wrong, how can the rest of the data be fully believed. > But Southwark has extra car parking rules for > Dulwich requiring 1.5-2 parking spaces per home. > The flats are being pitched as not needing play > provision because they will typically be rented to > two professional couples. So that's two households > per property. So before they are rented to a household of two professional couples, does this mean they will be pitched to the buy to let market rather than first time buyers? This kind of prediction is ridiculous, couples do have children or is it anticipated they will be evicted at this stage? > > M&S. I don't believe they've signed any contract > with the developer and hadn't during the last > planning application cycle. The developer could > just as easily, for the right price, lease the > property to any other business. Supporters of an > M&S at any price will feel pretty daft if a > Poundland or 99-p shop sign the lease. M&S is the > aspirational stalking horse to win local and > officer favour. We must judge the scheme on the > merits of any potential shop occupying it - > despite my predilection for M&S choccy biscuits > and socks. Exactly, which emphasises how important it is for the planning committee to heed the views of those living in the close vicinity whose lives will be badly affected by the structural and logistics changes rather than be overwhelmed by a brand blindness which may turn out to be a total red herring (as well as a stalking horse!)

I don't think anyone fell for it

Louisa Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- But no, we get arty farty street fanfare > plastered on the hoarding, which suggests that > image is more important than substance. Suggests no such thing or only if you prefer the "substance" of a plain ugly hoarding which could be an eyesore for a few months. "I'm confused" Hmmm......

Heard it too in North Cross Road

I wish you luck but the bottom line for me is until registered with the Charity Commission and there is information regarding which charities will be supported, basic requirements for a charity shop, I don't feel inclined to either donate or purchase. There are some causes I would chose to help without hesitation, there are others which I wouldn't. Is it legal to trade as a charity when not approved by the Charity Commission? Sorry to come over as negative, could just be your enthusiasm has made you impatient to get going.

Very exciting, and if you become one of the first 1000 founder members your name will be added to an art installation and your name will become a permanent part of the building (it says on the website).

DulwichVillageLady Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It has quietened down now. I've been able to enjoy > my time in the garden today. And where would this be that the weather has been such to enjoy your time in the garden today?

There have also been some more photos added to those originally hung on the wall opposite the Palmerston. Fascinating, a lovely idea.

I'm only guessing, but although the red brickwork was only laid down a short while ago, it had already deteriorated badly and had become deeply rutted and very uneven. Though it might not look so attractive, the tarmac will prove to be more hard-wearing and practical.