Jump to content

Earl Aelfheah

Member
  • Posts

    8,213
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Earl Aelfheah

  1. I would really like to see a thoughtful, joined up, area wide (and radical approach) to permeable street closures. That would make a genuine difference to peoples quality of life and is in the councils gift.
  2. Segregated cycle routes linking with the tube at Brixton and Oval / kennington would be good (but will never happen as it would mean the loss of on street car storage). Southwark could work with some of the e-bike schemes (such as Lime) to bring them to the south of the borough (having failed to work with TFL on 'Boris' bikes). Other than that, the biggest opportunity for half a century to improve local transport (the Bakerloo extension) has been missed, with the decision not to extend to Peckham.
  3. I don?t really agree with publishing photos. We don?t have public stocks anymore for good reason. That said, I would be surprised if the story is just made up and Lucy is not exactly denying it happened. So not that much sympathy.
  4. Lucy hasn?t exactly refuted the substance of the claim.
  5. Live from Tuscany on BBC2!
  6. Maybe PM the original poster and have a chat 'offline'?
  7. What you have to understand about Boris Johnson is that he doesn't really care about the detail of the deal. It's not that he is incapable, it's that he is indifferent. He's just interested in getting elected. None of it will effect his life in any discernible way.
  8. lucy123 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I am the victim That you are trying to expose! I > am horrified you would sink to new lows to shame > people! yes that fine, you can make an allegation > against me but make sure you have the proof (if > any) I do not recall walking past the card shop > and allowing the dog to foul! Do u have > photographic evidence of this? if not then it is > not your place to put my picture online without my > permission, you should go to the council, this is > seen as defimation of character. In you post, you > have presumed quite a lot about me and my > character, which I am very offended and I will > seek advice about you posting my picture. if you > have the actual evidence of the dog pooing, that's > what you should post to shame me, not a picture of > me walking by! > > Ive noticed from all you posts you go round > complaining or critising and now defimation of > character. which is totally unacceptable. > > Is that why you call yourself kidkrugger? does the > name say it all. I'm glad you called me > delightful, I wish I could say the same about you! > > > I hope you realise the extent of damage that you > cause by your behaviour, I'm sure you have no > conscience when it comes to doing the right thing! > > > Are you working for the authorities? if not, them > its not your place to put pictures up with out > permission!, I suggest you take it down. you've > been incredibily unpleasant, at least if I make a > statement, I make a fact statement. So are you saying that you do pick up after your dog, or that there is no evidence that you don't? Must admit, I think the posting of photos / public shaming is a bit much.
  9. Jules-and-Boo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Are they ever, if you're not on the beach? > The urban equivalent is Sliders > > These are the gucci ones > > https://www.gucci.com/uk/en_gb/pr/men/shoes-for-me > n/sandals-and-slides-for-men/web-slide-sandal-p-42 > 9469GIB109079?lgw_code=9565-807189669&ranMID=37933 > &ranEAID=gcdL%2FATRVoE&ranSiteID=gcdL_ATRVoE-a.LVc > yPPy351JVo1OegSnQ&utm_source=Linkshare_UK&utm_medi > um=affiliates&utm_campaign=1&utm_content=10&utm_te > rm=2523611&siteID=gcdL_ATRVoE-a.LVcyPPy351JVo1OegS > nQ&PublisherSID=2523611&PubName=Lyst+UK%2FEU Wow! Anyone spending ?180 on Gucci Sliders needs to have a word with themselves
  10. So anyone know when the new 'mural' is going up?
  11. fishbiscuits Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I accept your point. But I think a crackdown on > vehicles should probably be emissions based (or > maybe by size/weight?). A large saloon or estate > could be heavier, and more polluting, than a small > to mid-size SUV. SUVs are generally heavier / less aerodynamic and so more polluting than similar, non-SUV models. They also pose considerably more risk to pedestrians as their increased height causes more upper body injuries even at relatively low speeds and they can easily mount pavements / ride through barriers when out of control. There is no need for people to adopt pseudo military vehicles in the city - we used to mock the US for driving around in these things, now (sadly) Europe seems to be adopting them. They are heavily marketed of course, as the margins are much bigger than on smaller cars. Interesting article on it in the FT this morning: https://www.ft.com/content/2967c9e2-ffc3-11e9-b7bc-f3fa4e77dd47
  12. edbloke Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I?ve noticed those charging points and wondered > the logic of positioning a cluster of them > together on what must be the least populated > street in se22... > I guess it?s cheaper to install them in groups but > one charging point on different streets in the > area, each with a dedicated parking space, would > surely benefit more residents and the environment. ^This. Call me a cynic, but it seems a bit of a tick box (i.e. "we've installed X number of new charging points"). No one is going to park any significant distance from their home and so it would make much more sense to spread them across a number of streets.
  13. The crossing is obvious, there is a blooming big roundabout. It barely needs stating, but cars should not be hitting people and then driving off.
  14. I would like to ban people who stand head down, texting, in segregated bike lanes. Where did people use to stand and text before the segregated bike lane was introduced? I would also like to, maybe not ban, but heavily discourage / tax 4X4s in urban areas. Totally unnecessary and dangerous. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2019/oct/07/a-deadly-problem-should-we-ban-suvs-from-our-cities
  15. malumbu Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "where else is Gethsemane > supposed to go to pee pee" I really hope that is a direct quote. Hilarious.
  16. @dulwichbloke - you're right, there is no link to the parents behaviour and the child having (or not having) ADHD or autism. That said (as it's been raised already), what is the difference between a child diagnosed with ADHD, autism or oppositional defiant disorder and a child regularly acting in a way that is consistent with the behaviour a disorder describes? In other words, are some / any of those disorders more than just a term to describe a set of behaviours? Apologies if that's an ignorant question, but generally interested. Is the difference just a label from a psychiatrist? The suggestion above (and I've heard it before) is that one child (the one whose behaviour has been 'diagnosed') is deserving of help and the other is not, which seems weird to me.
  17. Fry's Chocolate Cream are great. Knocks Haribo out the park. I felt that Brexit extension day was too commercialised this year. Feels like it's losing it's magic.
  18. I've fixed the subject heading for you.
  19. Meadow are absolute vultures. I'm sure their tactics will eventually be rewarded by an inept council.
  20. Are there any joint initiatives going on between Southwark Council and TFL to improve transport in the south of the borough? Cycle hire schemes, new cycleways, imporvements to public transport?
  21. a decent second hand / vintage clothes store.
  22. Sorry for the ignorance, but what's the difference between 'plant based' and vegan?
  23. sandyman Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I just saw two parked outside Franklins! > > rahrahrah Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Anyone know whether the Lime bikes are going to > be > > extended to ED? The parking zone currently > stops > > at Camberwell. Yeah, it's not in the parking zone though. The peeps who left them there risk a fine / or ban.
  24. Any chance of Southwark working to bring Lime bikes to East Dulwich?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...