Earl Aelfheah

I love the idea that people take part in a consultation in order to say "I don't know". Genuinely don't understand why people would want a CPZ. it's not like there will be any fewer cars. You don't get guaranteed parking outside your house - it just makes travelling anywhere more difficult, having guests more difficult and parking more expensive. personally, I don't think 23% response rate is good enough. Bear in mind that those pushing for a CPZ will all have taken part in the consultation, where as many of those happy with the status quo won't even have been aware of it, sot he results are almost certainly skewed in favour of the 'fors'.

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I wouldn't be complacent even if (by some > miraculous universal assimilation of intelligence) > cars stuck to the 20mph, especially in side roads, > because the only near miss I've had as a > pedestrian is a cyclist bombing down the road. > They are almost silent until they are close to > you, and he would NEVER have been able to stop. Bikes are the real problem. That didn't take long.

Problem is, most of the rules aren't enforced - e.g. jumping lights, speeding down side roads, cutting corners and pulling out without looking. We just get speed bumps and the occasional camera. It would be good to get ACTUAL enforcement, by proper traffic police.

I support measures to reduce the precedent of cars, to slow traffic and improve the environment. The problem is, that will only work if at the same time, significant improvements are made to public / alternative transport. Otherwise no one is going to get anywhere.

The perpetrator is clearly deranged and needs to be caught as soon as possible. Very scary.

It's not about emissions, overall it's probably worse in terms of pollution and certainly all the speed bumps are. It's about reducing accidents and the seriousness of accidents, which is also important.

TheCat Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > All of the technicalities of jump starting or push > starting aside, the OP has effectively partially > responded to her own complaint.... > > Living in a big metropolis is inherently more > 'unfriendly' than smaller towns.....I think you'll > find this relationship holds the world over....its > a downside of City living.... I don't really agree with that. I find people round here really friendly. Also, i'm willing to bet that if you knocked on your neighbours door they would help you.

I wonder whether it's the same people you see driving around in balaclavas, doing wheelies etc.

It's a fairly regular thing on Heber Riad. Police seem unable to do anything to stop them

Horsebox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > At least he died doing something he loved. Being crushed by an elephant?

It sounds like a great improvement all in all. I'm hoping to pop in over the weekend.

Wow, those prices are pretty steep. I remember the Great Exhibition had some fairly crazy prices when it opened which were later reduced. Maybe they'll follow suit in time.

Really depressing. I use that SO all the time. It was so convenient having it just round the corner. I can't help thinking that when Royal Mail start closing local facilities like this, that it's the beginning of terminal decline. With so many other providers who will deliver to your door at times when you're in, or offer to leave stuff with neighbours etc, who's going to continue to use RM to send packages?

New Zealand is a great place to drive. We bought a cheap car in Auckland, drove across the country and eventually sold it on for a small profit in Christchurch. If they're getting the ferry between he north and south island though, make sure they think ahead and book tickets in advance as I recall it was far from a turn up and go type affair. If they're in that part of the world and if they can, it's a great spring board for a visit to many SE Asian designations. Indonesia is really diverse and definitely worth exploring.

pommie Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Oz experience bus is a great way to get around. I > did it in my 20's and got to travel and meet lots > of people. Stayed in places like cattle farms, > sheep stations, camped on frazer island. Loved it It does depend on what kind of experience they want. The 'experience bus' will organise you, hook you up with lots of other kids and you'll have a good time, but it's far from independent travel. A bit more of a 'brits on tour' type thing. Have to be honest, we despaired whenever we were somewhere and a convoy of 'experience buses' would descend on a place - that was usually our cue to move on. Horses for courses though.

... or if Southwark stopped granting drop kerb applications and encouraging people to pave front gardens. Anyway, we're getting off the point. The real issue is the playground both here and in Peckham Rye. We should be able to do better.

Sorry, cross posted with Miga, but yes, the reaction of the person on the recieving end of the 'attention' is absolutely key.

There is nothing sexist with a man (or woman) flirting. But when it becomes clear that one party isn't receptive, obviously feels uncomfortable and yet it continues, that's when there is an issue. Men also have to be sensitive to the fact that Women are often have to put up with repeated, unwanted attention and low level street harassment (much as I would like to pretend that I get wolf whistled at as a man, it isn't true) and so they are operating in a very different context.

Seems pretty shortsighted to me. If it becomes the norm that almost anything delivered recorded by RM ends up being returned to sender, more and more companies will stop using them.

If true, it's a real blow. I often visit the sorting office and I'm not alone (there is often a line). It basically means i won't be using them anymore, as they only deliver during the day (so effectively I always pick up recorded items from the SO).

I live in South Peckham, SE22

The 2004 floods were indeed the result of a burst water main, so not related as far as I know. The works to ensure water gathers in the park was in response to some wealthy houses in the Village having their basements flooded and the inevitable lobbying of the council that ensued, I believe. Maybe James B can shed some light on the exact circumstances.

TImthink the point of the works was to ensure water gathered in the park. It seems to have been successful unfortunately

Camwicham Green

Anyone know why a section of Crystal Palace Road has disappeared from Streetview?