Emerson Crane

thick

Jah Lush Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > Emerson Crane wrote - > > I'm not after you. Do you have a persecution > complex? No more than most on here.

Jah Lush Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It just might be because Matthew is a Liverpool > supporter but I did agree with your original post > yesterday (perhaps you've forgotten that) and I > also thoroughly agree with Matthew's post today > too. No I haven't forgotten, but where on this post have I said Jah Lush will be after you? Can we now agree to move on?

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Narnia - you realise it's not finished yet, right? :))

Always and forever - Heatwave

matthew123 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Emerson Crane Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Cheers Chavski. Fergusons comments bemoaning > the > > refs decisions going against them were steeped > in > > irony. Luiz not being sent off was his chief > > gripe. Has he never heard of karma? What goes > > around comes around eh Fergie? Rooney should > have > > been serving a ban so strictly speaking > shouldn't > > have been on the the pitch for Luiz to foul, > but > > hey, I'm not arguing. And Vidic out for > Liverpool > > game. Oh dear!! > > The time for Fergie to have said all that about a > player who should have got sent off, bad Ref, and > how it changed the game, was at Wigan. Then > perhaps instead of neutrals like myself pissing > themselves laughing with his hypocracy last night, > in his post match interview, he'd have banked some > credibility rather than what is now just the sad > pathetic snide remarks of a foul old Manager > trying to influence the Ref ahead of Sunday's game > at Anfield. I'm surprised you haven't had Narnia and Sandperson accusing you of imbalance, rudeness, being inflammatory etc. You can bet if I'd put that on here, they'd have been at me straight away.

matthew123 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Watched the Old Firm match tonight on Sky - utter > disgrace. Do we want them in Premiership - no > thanks!! At the risk of being accused of being antagonistic, inflammatory etc I agree. No place in the game for such nonsense, maybe in Latin America, but not here.

Keith Moon liked the odd drink and drugs and looked how he ended up. Very sad. You'd think those that care for him would try to intervene and help him. Still, I guess some people can't be helped or don't want to be.

Human Nature - Miles Davis

Sandperson Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think what I object to is the fact that EC/Atila > can't let a United game go by without attacking > one or other of the team or the manager for > cheating/diving/offending his sensibilities in > some way or other. There is rarely a balanced > analysis of the game from him or the possibility > of a debate. There's no balance. There's no > acceptance that maybe this is a game and other > teams, including his own, might bend or break the > rules or might have decisions go for them that > shouldn't have. The same old insinuations get > trotted out time after time, we had too much time > added on, no one gets a penalty awarded against > United, the referee is biased towards united, the > commentators and media are biased towards United. > It's tired and tiring (hence the yawn). Have a > debate, make sensible comments about the team and > the performance but why always bring it back to > the fact that we are favoured or that so and so > should have had a red card etc. etc. Most of this is erroneous, as for balance, most of the postings on here lack that.

Nature boy - Ahmad Jamal

Bar

Oh I wept - Free

Keef Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I've asked this before, but noone answered, so > I'll try again. Being as you have all now been > shown how to ignore posts by anyone you want, why > don't those who find Emerson offensive, just put > his posts on ignore, and hd can do the same. I've > said time and again, that Emerson is often his own > worst enemy on here, getting way too wound up over > a game. But, as ever, he made a point this > morning, admittedly in his own special way, but > not in an offensive way, that was followed by > "same old Atila, yawn" (which by the way, is > incredibly annoying). Only then did he respond, > and yet he gets all the blame. Emerson is at least > as guilty as anyone, and really needs to turn the > other cheek sometimes, but to suggest he's the > only responsible party, is bullshit! (tu)

I dig your act - The O'Jays

murphy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > At Wigan the ref made one wrong decision on an off > the ball incident he didn't see properly, Rooney > should have been sent off. Last night the ref, > with a clear view of the action made several poor > decisions. > > Emerson, the idea is it is supposed to be a debate > not a slanging match. You could have argued "on > paper Arsenal have the easier run in but I am > worried the injuries/number of games/perhaps lack > of experience etc will mean we will slip up when > we are not expecting it". > > The fact is Arsenal do have the much easier run > in, even with a few players out (as Utd have), > most matches you should win, so for me the > debating point is "can Arsenal keep their nerve" - > I would be saying exactly the same if it were > Spurs, City or Liverpool in Arsenal's position now > - I wouldn't be saying it if it were Chelsea > because they have been there and done it > recently. > > You are welcome to join the debate and talk about > Arsenal's chances in some detail or you can just > carry on slagging off Utd, which might be > cathartic for you but doesn't take a debate about > who might win the league any further. Congratulations!!! You win this years award for the most patronising post.

Jah Lush Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Oh please sir, a big boy did it and ran away. You know what Jah time after time you've shown yourself to be a real piece of work, and yet again you are a model of consistency. You are one of worst offenders on here and yet you resent being told that you are. Now go and have a play in the sand pit with the rest of your friends in the creche.

Atticus Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Believe me, Anna would not have backed you up had > you been supporting Man Utd. Believe what you like, Anna is a little more mature than most on here, and thank god for that.

Keef Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Jah even agreed with his initial point, and it was > only after the whole "yawn" thing that it went the > usual way. And we all know who can be relied upon to come up with the "yawn" stupidity don't we.

murphy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > At Wigan the ref made one wrong decision on an off > the ball incident he didn't see properly, Rooney > should have been sent off. Last night the ref, > with a clear view of the action made several poor > decisions. > > Emerson, the idea is it is supposed to be a debate > not a slanging match. You could have argued "on > paper Arsenal have the easier run in but I am > worried the injuries/number of games/perhaps lack > of experience etc will mean we will slip up when > we are not expecting it". > > The fact is Arsenal do have the much easier run > in, even with a few players out (as Utd have), > most matches you should win, so for me the > debating point is "can Arsenal keep their nerve" - > I would be saying exactly the same if it were > Spurs, City or Liverpool in Arsenal's position now > - I wouldn't be saying it if it were Chelsea > because they have been there and done it > recently. > > You are welcome to join the debate and talk about > Arsenal's chances in some detail or you can just > carry on slagging off Utd, which might be > cathartic for you but doesn't take a debate about > who might win the league any further. Ok lets have it straight here. Nerve is something the Arsenal are ofetn accused of not having enough "nerve", so I commented on that, also stated that I thought it a bit rich that Ferguson has a pop at a ref for not getting a decision when he clearly did in the game before. As Anna has been kind enough to point out, I didnt use derogatory lanuage as JAh Lush chose to, and then has nerve to point the finger at me. For your info, I think we've got an "ok" chance of winning it, but the number of injuries are conspiring against us. As always, thanks Anna for the voice of sanity in this playground. As for holier than thou!!! Oh please.

murphy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ref had an awful game. >Just like the Wigan Game then > I think Arsenal should win the league, have a much > easier run in than Utd who will drop quite a few > more points so Arsenal will never have a better > chance, as long as the can keep their nerve. And don't keep having players ruled out through injury. If football was just about keeping your nerve, then Mancs should have been able to do so and win last night. What happened to that famous nerve they are supposed to possess in abundance and pundits always insist they, and no other team, have?

How can you go home - AWB

Jah Lush Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > P.A.L (Pathetic Arsenal Loser). Original. How old are you?

Pal? You're obviously thinking of someone else.

Same old Jah drivel.