Alan Medic

Most of the posts here are from the excluded guys but I do think if you're trying to advertise something you would be better off not presuming everyone knows what it is.

http://www.london-eating.co.uk/2821.htm Worth considering if you read the reviews. I've only ever had something to take away from there for lunch.

I think she sells girls toys. That's why boys aren't invited. I don't know why it's called a party though.

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Alan, I'm not saying that there is no situation in > which using a firearm to defend yourself is > inappropriate. > I wasn't questioning your stance on firearms H. I was wondering what people would do to defend themselves/their property without the use of a gun? For example, would you hit someone with a hammer if you got close enough to them and had one handy? That could cause a fatality. I don't think I could use any weapon against someone unless my life was in danger. But if it was I would use anything at my disposal.

Long day Mick?

If using a gun to defend your home and property and self is out of the question, what would be an acceptable means of defence given that the intruder may be bigger and stronger than you?

http://www.couchsurfing.org/ Someone I used to work with actually did this. A free option.

I think Carroll can be bought by WH at the end of the season if they don't get relegated. Something seriously wrong at Liverpool if they wouldn't fork out an extra ?2M to get Dempsey like Spurs did. This from the same club who recklessly spent ?35M on Carroll just because they got all that money for Torres. Don't be surprised to see Owen back there.

My wife asked me who is playing. She has no interest in sport. When I queried this I was told it's because she is going to Australia. That is the end of this news bulletin.

I think MM's comment is perhaps too subtle for you Carter, and others I'm sure. Not meant to be an insult at all.

djsenior Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > When opening, TGE told local residents that the > license would remain the same Who exactly did they tell? I'm a local resident. They didn't tell me.

Well that's like asking how many cloaks Batman has Nette. None of your business.

What paperwork dg2? It's just a matter of knowing what can be done and how it can be done. I guess the most that's required is that the electrics are outside the room, so the cable goes through a wall or partition. The fact that what you are really talking about is a toilet and a basin.........well it's not much different to a kitchen where most people have their w/machines i.e in terms of water.

At least a free drink. I'm a local resident but don't require a bridge. Are you djsenior?

I've just had a ?20 note refused in a local shop as it is out of date. This is just one of many ?20 notes my wife gave me from her 'secret stash' to cover her trip to Australia (see above). I don't know if I should take them to a bank or a museum.

To be able to sit outside and have a drink is not the norm in this country due to the climate. The problem from my experience is that some of those who do sit outside do not realise how much noise they are making, possibly due to having had too much to drink. Some people just can't handle their drink and behave immaturely. Plenty can and should be allowed the little pleasure that it is to sit outside when it borders on being a rare experience. Who says the TGE encourages outside drinking and the CPT did not? The CPT had tables outside too. I don't get your point James unless you are saying the TGE tells people to sit outside.

That's ok Frank. Just don't keep doing it.

Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Declan. It's a toilet. Keep up. How am I supposed to remain anonymous Mick when you keep calling me that?

The what TT?

It's confusing Mick. The thread title says 'Redoing bathroom' and it appears to be a toilet. Next time I need advice on repainting the bedroom I think I'll call it the West Wing.

dulwichgirl2 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Oh no. We hadn't thought of that. It is just a > cloakroom - ie loo and whb- if that makes any > difference? So it's not actually a bathroom (no bath/shower), more of a toilet? Is that right?

SCSB79 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Alan Medic Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > SCSB79 Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Mick Mac Wrote: > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > ----- > > > Lennon gets little money to spend, the club > > > > is very conservative since Fergus McCann > > saved > > > the > > > > club. > > > > > > He spent ?12million last year. > > > > > http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/celtic-fc/transf > > > ers/verein_371_2011.html > > > > It wasn't on players. > > Unless I am reading it wrong, that says ?15m spent > on players in 2011/12?? > That's 'market value' which doesn't make any sense at all. Net transfer amounted to about ?2M.

Wife decided to go to Australia next week.

Are you sure you can legally have a washing machine in a bathroom?

Michael Owen seemed confident this morning on twitter that he would be signing for someone today. Wonder who?