edhistory

A low grade piece of "journalism" on Sky News this morning. Tony Jenkins made it to screen. Can anyone identify the person who pays DS Andy Collin's wages?

> Me ,bitter Miss Gibbs ? Noooooo. A HOGS reference will be mainly lost around here.

The Junior School are said to be good at arithmetic. Here's a puzzle: How many coaches could fit on the school drive?

Townleygreen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > the new building on MOL land was 9 years > ago. That's OK then.

I'm interested in the identity of the person who signs the contacts. A step towards personal legal nexus.

Someone at the school is party to the coach contracts. Who is this person?

Townleygreen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > the school's fields are classed as > Metropolitan Open Land and are not allowed to be > used for parking. Interesting repeated assertion unsupported by evidence. But you can build a theatre on MOL. And, they've lost the WD40 to open the drive gates. Do geography teachers do apologetics?

Consultation (a specialist noun when used by Southwark Council) also includes these streets: "Other areas for improvement include measures to calm speeds and improve visibility for pedestrians and cyclists on Lyndhurst Way, Melon Road, Bellenden Road, Holly Grove, Chadwick Road, Choumert Road, Maxted Road, Oglander Road, Adys Road, Nutbrook Street, Amott Road, Underhill Road, Whateley Road, Silvester Road, Pellatt Road, Rodwell Road, Heber Road, Jennings Road, Goodrich Road, Crystal Palace Road, and Landells Road." The yellow paint manufacturers will need to ramp up production for all these extra double yellow lines.

Here is the South Dulwich boundary:

The Sydenham Wells is a fake connection. ----------------------------------------- An Account of a New Purging Spring Discovered at Dulwich in Surrey, by Mr. John Martyn, F. R. S. Prof. Botan. Cantab Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (1683-1775), Vol. 41 (1739 - 1741), pp. 835-838 Published by: The Royal Society In the Autumn of 1739, Mr. Cox, the Master of a well-known House of good Entertainment, called the Green Man at Dulwich, lying about a Mile beyond the village, was desirous to dig a Well for Service of his House, there being no Spring of good Water near it. December 11 1740. [The full three page text of the article is available on-line]

South Dulwich?

The Grove Tavern sits within a designated Southwark Council APZ (Archaeological Protection Zone). This will be an added feature of the planning permission process.

It due course Southwark Council will apply to the Valuation Office to have properties with paved over gardens re-valued for council tax. Southwark Council will also start charging annual rent for dropped kerbs.

flocker spotter Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The dulwich galley has appropriated What has the Dulwich Picture Gallery got to do with this?

> Just could not believe that plot of land cost nearly ?1m! The Land Registry record should be available. I'm tempted to spend the ?3.

just_browsing: Are you acting as an agent for the owner of the mural?

> As for the building, any developer like HYN or whatever they are called would have levelled the plot. Which part of the plot was not "levelled"?

That makes sense. Not a VAT refund, but a lower rate of VAT on an invoice.

Miss Wiggy, Which part of the original architecture was preserved?

I'd like to see the law on this. But I'm more interested about how HMRC credited your bank account if you were not registered.

You need to have a legitimate VAT registration to claim a legitimate VAT refund. Why are these people VAT registered? Is there a yet to be told backstory?

Dog walker allows dog to eat stuff from compost heap.

Under capitalism the starting point for a discussion might be "Who owns it?", Nigello Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > On the other hand, there?s an interesting > discussion to be had about the spontaneity of > graffiti occurring on a managed piece of street > art. > > ......

A good example of vandalism of our industrial architectural heritage.

Are these the people trying to overturn the Dulwich Park legal covenant?