How many times has this been discussed? Alot. Clearly there are groups of friends within this community and subsets of those groups. That these relationships can be seen through discussions on the Forum is not a huge surprise or indeed problematic. That there is a group of people who are central to the technical functioning of the Forum and that they are friends is not a surprise or problem, surely? That they may have an insight into the backroom workings of the Forum is not a surprise or a problem, surely? With that insight and involvement comes an air of authority. They havent sought that authority, but have it by dint of having knowledge. Knowledge is power. Even when not sought. This is a function of having a community based, community run, free for use, internet Forum. Some people have to run it and they will have more knowledge than the majority. This doent automatically make them a clique. They are part of their community and are answerable to the community through the debates that can be found here. However if knowledge gives power, then power requires humility and self-awareness for it to be used effectively. It may be worth reflecting on whether there is a tendency for such friends to leap to the defence of, or in support of each other and their wider group of friends, without reflecting on the impact that this behaviour has on others. They may have to self-edit or even self-censor. It may be that the freedom of speech that they allow to others is self-denied to them. This is one of the burdens of authority and power. The alternative is to have the group who manage, facilitate, mediate and police the community as a separate entity, not part of the community, but apart and separate from the community.