????

you lost your car keys then Salsa?

I still miss Narnia. I've now lost my 100 partner too, driven out by the Curry Clique PS Mick, you shouldn't believe everything people tell you on buses

..is one of my favourite Stevie tracks

certainly not in "that's my daughter that is and if you so much as f*cking touch her I'll f*cking kill you, you understand?" way

My missus fits the criteria but her dad isn't scary...

no, he hadn't paid the ransom

...not so amazing for getting a beer to watch the game tho...

The Hampton Court Palace in the late 80s had a draw* JAW dropping, leg shakingly gorgeous bar maid, who was the landlord's daughter - unfortunately he was the most protective father imaginable and also 'quite' scary, which meant if you were a bloke under 30 it was almost dangerous to go in there. *freudian slip there

as one departs, another steps in their shoes

#bugaboo

#guardianistas

Jah Lush Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- . Take heart though, you > played very well and are a much better side > without Carroll and Nolan in the starting Xl. as everyone in the World knows, except on fella,,,who happens to be our manager ;(

Clowns

Jah Lush Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Unlucky Spammers. Was just poor bad luck, we were miles the better team. A bit frustrating that without two injury time goals in our games against Utd and Spuds(actually 3 if you include your winner at UP) we'd be 4 (5) points better off and in the hunt still...

100

Bromley's next on the list...

YES - parts of southern California and London now have third world levels of measles infections 'cos of bad science, and idiocy propaganda spread by stooopid middle class 'moms' and the supposed empowerment of the fooking internet....

Lefties in realising they can't beat basic mathematics shocker

Greece has managed to negotiate itself three more days to find the money tree, all is well.....

PMs are sooooooo last year

StraferJack Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "If we (the state and/or private developers) did > (and had) built more homes then prices and rent > wouldn't be as bad." > > I've said it a million times - even if enough > (define?) houses were sudden;y built tomorrow, the > outcome would be unacceptable to current > homeowners. For prices to lower enough to meet yer > average wage earner, current property would have > to fall massively in value. There would be outcry > > or maaybe there wouldn't - maybe people saying > "just build more - problem solved!" would be happy > for the 1 million they spent to suddenly be worth > 300k > > because if you build several hundred thousand > houses and prices just plateau for a couple of > years that doesn't help the problem Yup but that?s not going to happen is it ? like *kerpow* a million new houses by August. By increasing housing availability incrementally and continually to get nearer demand over time (which is what would happen in reallity) the heat and froth would be the first to reduce so people wouldn?t feel ?I?ve got to get on now?; over a bit more time we may see a small fall in prices and certainly in rents but not catastrophically. This would free up more money for spending hopefully boosting the economy too ; it may put some very recent buyers in small negative equity but unless they ?need? to move this is just ?on paper?; over time and combined with some inflation (Hopefully not deflation, but that?s a different story) housing starts to become more affordable all round as prices(rent and buying) start to fall in real terms for sure. Fuck rent controls/mansion taxes?we?ve got to starts to build ? itself a booster to the economy, it?s so fooking obvious.

Well , I've lived in East Dulwich for over 20 years with a couple of breaks and for me it's at its best now. And, as it's personal preference, I am now old enough and lucky enough (touch wood) to not have to move anywhere 'edgier' less cdeveloped, up and coming etc, ever again something I'm quite happy with being a boring old increasing middle class git. The reality is it wasn't the sh1thole that some newcomers seem to think it was 20 years ago but it's not the 'entitleled' 'snobby' clapham blow in nappy valley other people make out (*ahem no names); Excluding house prices, by most metrics - food choice; shop choice, schools, actual real mixture of different srts of people; pub choice; crime; etc etc it's feels better to me than in the early 90s.....just my opinion of course. Same true of much of London...although not West Ham, UP or Plaistow OP :)

Er, demand is massively outsripping supply - it's not a 'concept' it's blatantly obvious. If we (the state and/or private developers) did (and had) built more homes then prices and rent wouldn't be as bad.

Jah Lush Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I don't remember that. Obviously, deleted from the > memory bank. Don't worry, I don't see a repeat at all on Sunday. Happy Birthday Jimmy Greaves btw (according to West Ham website)

er, no, a question. You came accross as being a bit sneery to the OP to me, and apparently not just to me. You've said you didn't mean it to be that awy and explained what you meant I believe you. As an aside I think you're both naive and a bit simplistic to think that the profit motive is some how intrinsically wrong..... which isn't to say I don't think the London housing market ain't broke by the way ...this isn't a court of law by the way