Parkdrive

Shaved head, stocky built, wearing shorts along with an all year round tan, fading tat's and Reebok Classics With usual addition of a gold chain around the neck, sovereign ring perhaps, a nice "cut here" tattoo tastefully round the neck, or perhaps a tasteful leaping Millwall lion tat on the calf. Winners one and all.

Seabags description sums it up perfectly. I can't add to that.

You're the man - Marvin Gaye

So if a woman decides to wear revealing or skimpy clothing because that's what she feels comfortable in, would she deemed to be "asking for it"?

LadyDeliah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm partial to a bit of chav but don't mind a > poshboy now and again, although saying that, too > much posh can be a bit nauseating. Chavs are just nasty and wrong on all levels

steveo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Lampard is a dick Lampard needs to be shown the door on the evidence of last night. And yet that august publicaton the Sun gave him MOTM!! What fcuking game did they watch? Ox was MOTM for me, Rooney was non existemt, Smalling and Jones were found wanting again and again. Woy obviously didn't do his homework, Ecuador have a good record coming into this competition and the England camp totally underestimated them. God helps us when the likes of Suarez,Cavani, Balotelli, Pirlo etc face up to us.

Seabag Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > He's still out there, in fact I just saw two, off > to watch the footy at The Bird in Hand, a full on > Geezer Boozer in Dartmouth Road > > Shaved head, stocky built, wearing shorts along > with an all year round tan, fading tat's and > Reebok Classics > > I somehow feel reassured when I see a proppa > Geezer (not to be mistaken for a 'bloke' or a > 'fella') ,it's like somethings don't change and I > like that. No matter how many Hipsters, Flip > Flops, Fops or new Dads move in to populate the > local areas, there's still room for the resolute > Geezer > > Sydenham retains its full quota I'm pleased to > say > > > "Go on my Son" > > "Alright geezer" > > "Geezer" Alternatively known as chavs

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hahahahahahaha!!!!!! > > "It hurts when you?re always doing your best for > your club and then you hear that you might be > going to Tottenham," > > Di Maria > > http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/europe > an/angel-di-maria-says-being-linked-with-transfer- > to-tottenham-hurt-9460958.html Certainly made me smile

Jah Lush Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > He don't wear nothing else. Why spoil a look > you're happy with? No I agree, nothing wrong with wearing what you feel comfortable with.

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > > I'd be pissed off with Jason after this. I'd want > to know the truth. Alan, do you not think it was very arrogant of him to walk out on the Republic a few years back becuase of his perceived lack of quality flights, accommodation,and as a result of his falling out with McCarthy? Would pride for representing your nation not override such matters?

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Imt gonna wear my jeans and a t-shirt tomorrow. You cool dude you.

LadyDeliah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > With the rise in poverty due to austerity cuts, > people who walk about flaunting their wealth are > totally to blame when they get mugged. > > Discuss.... If the implication here is that all those responsible for muggings are impoverished due to austerity cuts, and steal to augment their meagre incomes,then I would say this premise is entirely wrong. There are many muggers who commit crime not because of poverty, but because ( amongst other reasons) 1.They want something for nothing and have no wish to work for 2. Have a drug habit to support 3. Are simply envious of an individual who may well have worked hard to buy a luxury item such as a phone, car, shoes (yes there have been unfortunates mugged for thier footwear), and vent their spleen by stealing. To put these muggings purely down to austerity cuts is quite simply ludicrous.It is also possible that those guilty of muggings are sociopaths

The Stealer - Free

People make the world go round - Stylistics

Innocent until proved guilty, isn't that how our justice system works?

The end - The Doors

The Bottle - Gil Scott Heron

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > What does having a high opinion of yourself mean? > It's obviously wrong as PD has implied. Would it > be better to have a low opinion of oneself? I > think not, though I'm open to PD explaining why > it's important in terms of his judgement of Keane. I mean he's an arrogant thug who seems to think he's better than those around him. His action in walking out on the Republic of Ireland because, if memory serves me right, he felt that the facilities provided such as hotels and flights weren't to his liking or up to his standard. That is breath takingly arrogant. Surely the pride of representing his country would have overridden such trifles? And the tiff with McAteer says a lot about the man.

My Balloons going up - Archie Bell and the Drells

red devil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Parkdrive Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > > You my friend are in the minority claiming it > > didn't end his career, and it was an assualt > from > > a thug, which had it been committed on the > street > > would have have seen him in the dock. Now you > > climb back into your rdd box with your red > tainted > > specs. He's a c**t was/is end of story really. > > Perhaps he should go back to Yanited to teach > kids > > the right way to tackle, what do you reckon? > Him > > and Scholes would be a win double. > > > The 'minority' also includes medical experts that > carried out examinations on Haaland. These medical > exams came about after Haaland read Keane's > autobiography, and no doubt with ? signs flashing > away, he decided to take legal action against > Keane for ending his career. For a damages claim > to stand up, he had to get independent medical > opinion, which subsequently confirmed that > Haaland's career was ended by another injury, and > Keane's tackle played no part whatsoever in > Haaland retring from the game. The legal action > was immediately dropped. You were wrong to say > that Keane ended Haalands's career, and you were > wrong to say he broke his leg. You see 'my > friend', that is what is known as facts, not the > ramblings of a hate filled, bile spewing troll. > You and anyone else is perfectly entitled to > namecall Keane, it doesn't bother me in the > slightest. As Mick said, it's a bit pointless and > reflects more on the poster, but each to their > own. I seem to remember you took umbrage that a > poster called you a c*nt in the not too distant > past. Seems that you like to dish it out but can't > take it... I can take it but that guy was in the wrong "my friend" and for the record I apologised to the guy because he, incorrectly assumed I accused him of being a a racist,info Keane is still and always will be a c**t. Why? Because he's thug, with a high opinion of himself, walking out of the Ireland camp during a World Cup supports that. Next? And as for your comment that it doesn't matter to you in the slightest, you're making a hell of a fuss for someone who does care either way, no? As dfor refelecting on the poster, suggest you take a look at your back catalogue.

Jah Lush Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It was a bit like watching AVB's Spurs at the > beginning of this season. Slow, tentative patient > passing across the back four and midfield. BORING! > > > The only plusses for me were Lalana, Lalana and > err...Lalana. Wilshire played well when he came > on. Sturridge did alright (good goal) but as a > front pairing Rooney and Sturridge still aren't > doing it for me. They play too far apart from each > other. > > And what is the point of Welbeck? I think he's right at home at Yanited.

red devil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Parkdrive Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > > Didn't help though did it? > > Which bit of ''...it didn't even injure him'' > don't you get? > He didn't break his leg. He didn't end his career. > Before coming on here frothing at the mouth, try > coming up with some actual facts... You my friend are in the minority claiming it didn't end his career, and it was an assualt from a thug, which had it been committed on the street would have have seen him in the dock. Now you climb back into your rdd box with your red tainted specs. He's a c**t was/is end of story really. Perhaps he should go back to Yanited to teach kids the right way to tackle, what do you reckon? Him and Scholes would be a win double.

Take that you c***. And don't ever stand over me sneering about fake injuries. Talking about Alf Inge Haaland tackle, quoted in book Keane - the Autobiography . Such a nice fella.

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Yeah but he's still a @#$%& ;-) Big style

red devil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Keane's tackle didn't break Haland's leg, it > didn't even injure him, he got up and played the > rest of the match. > Keane's tackle didn't end Haland's career either, > that was due to an injury Haland was already > carrying, which Keane's tackle had no effect on, a > fact Haland confirmed in his own autobiography... > > ETA Typo Didn't help though did it? What kind of demented fcuk does that and stands over the prone player berating him, oh yeah that would yer man.