Parkdrive

I initially thought City might do it, now I'm not so sure. I've got a feeling CSKA Fulham might take it. Although the game against Moyes charges was dire, and I don't think any side on that showing would be frightened of them. Looks like it will be an interesting season.

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Parkdrive Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > He probably means well > > I really doubt it. If he wanted to help people, > he'd put some free advice out there for > cooking/shopping on a budget. Not bring out a > bloody book. It's a really cynical move IMO. > Besides, he's a very rich man who obviously knows > nothing about feeding a family on a tight budget, > so the whole thing is pretty much irrelevant. I did say he was tw*t

That's a mouse I think.

Dream Away - Harry Georgeson, sorry George Harrison

He probably means well, but he is a tw*t nontheless.

Will put these on the the predictor thingy as well but just for the record Man Utd 3 V Crystal Palace 0 Aston Villa 2 V Newcastle 1 Fulham 1 V West Brom 1 Hull 1 V Cardiff 1 Stoke 0 V Man City 3 Sunderland 1 V Arsenal 2 Tottenham 2 V Norwich 0 Everton 0 V Chelsea 3 Sunday 15th September 2013 Southampton 1 V West Ham 2 Monday 16th September 2013 Swansea 1 V Liverpool 2

ratty Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The realisation over the last few years is > strongly that the England football team mean > nothing to me anymore. Oh how different to the > teams of 86 - 90 for whom I would have supported > to the ends of the earth. Quite sad really! I'm with you on this one, but I've never been overly fussed with Engerlund. At least I've seen them win the world cup in my life time and on home soil, albeit I was 9 years old, so yes I have given my age away.

A few comments on the Engerlund game last night. Walker, why, just why? Hodgson said Wilshere is finding his way back to full fitness, why fcuking play him then? Cleverley, appalling, Young gain why? Milner, I give up. Nobody in that side covered themselves in glory. And if Lambert is really the best option we have up front, then fair enough, and we have to hold our hands up and say the rest of the world has not only caught up, but has gone racing by and left us standing. The sooner the poxy media wake up to this and stop the stupid hoopla surrounding the national side each time a major tournament approaches the better.

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Yeah poor old Andy does look like playing half a > season will be considered a good year for him. RVP was like that for many seasons at Arsenal. We were lucky to get half a season out of him.

henryb Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Absolutely. It would good if the police actually > enforced the existing laws for cars. Agreed, but also think existing laws should be enforced for cyclists who insist on using pavements with scant regard for pedestrians.

David Watts - The Kinks

Doctor Robert - The Beatles

I don't need no doctor - Ray Charles

Jah Lush Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ?3 million or even ?1.5 million is a ridiculous > amount of money for a loan move. Indeed, but that late in the day they chanced their arm, and failed.

maxxi Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Why they didn't get Ba? - Mourinho was willing to > lend him out - just not to the gooners Cos CSKA Fulham apparently want ?3 million for a years loan, that probably put them off. I know we only offered 1.5 mill

Worryingly for West Ham I saw a full page advert for their forthcoming home game against Everton in this mornings Metro. Surely a game like that has to be a sell out or close to it.

Soon I will be gone - Free

Or you could have asked "so how come nobody wanted to sign for United?"

Mesut fecking Ozil. And United not securing ANYONE apart from Afro dude. That wouldn't have happened during Fergies reign.

Arsenal 1 ?110 million 0

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I've gone for Liverpool to beat Unt 2-1, and > Arsenal to beat Spurs 3-1. I suspect they'll both > be wrong, but just have a feeling, especially > after the way Arsenal have been almost written off > by some. It's a local derby they'll be desperate > to win, and spurs are still a very new team. > > I think Spurs will finish the season above Arsenal > though. There, I've said it. And what will be their excuse when they don't? Didn't they spend shed loads least summer as well?

Millhaven Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Parkdrive Wrote: > > > > You clearly are in need of help if you believe > > that Abromavichs sins and those of the City > > backers are of no consequence and becasue > others > > have deemed them to be fit an proper, well > thats > > ok by you. Oh the irony indeed, far from being > > naive the article was telling and that, I > suspect, > > is was you dislike as it hit home and touched a > > nerve. Classless CSKA Fulham all over. > > This is becoing a rather dull circular argument > which I am afraid I will have to leave you to tilt > at your particular windmills. > > Haha! The old 'classless' insult. The last bastion > of a football fan that has lost an argument. ;-) Tilting at windmills from a Chavski supporter, how ironic. Still blindly refusing to acknowledge that your backer plundered his nations resources with the assistance of Putin and thinks thats ok. Very telling, says alot about you. Next you'll be telling me he helps old ladies across the road.

Millhaven Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Nothing to do with Johnny Foreigner, I'm from > > immigrant stock myself, its do with with > robbing > > your own people and commiting human right > abuses > > such as torture which I find unsavoury. Or > perhaps > > because you support one of the particular clubs > in > > question you find it hard to take and therefore > > need to defend? Arsenal were linked with a > company > > which were also linked to human rights abuses > and > > I screamed blue murder on the the blogs and > fans > > websites about it, as I have no wish for a club > > I've supported for 45 years to get involved > with > > such despicable behaviour. You're pasing the > buck > > by saying it's down to those who decide who is > > "fit and proper", do you not have a conscience > and > > mind of your own? > > Firstly, Syed was talking about Chelsea through > Abramovich being corrosive for football. He is > wrong, total opposite has happened. His naive > argument was based upon how Abramovich made his > billions. Which is a totally different argument > altogether. > > Secondly, I am not passing the buck, they already > have it, that is their job to define who is or > isn't a fit or proper person to own a club. You or > I cant make that decision for them. Frankly the > fit and fair panel have been found wanting. We can > blog about it but I suspect it is going to take a > bit more than that. If you think your club is run > by arms dealers, torturers, pension thieves or > even pornographers then it is down to you to stop > giving that club your cash. > > Arsenal. Oh the irony. The club that bribed their > way into the football league. Helped by, surprise > surprise Liverpool FC, who'd thunk it eh?! > > I think football is mostly governed by crooks, > fiends and incompetents and always has been by the > looks of it. The only way things will ever change > is if we all stopped attending matches. Then they > might sit up and actually listen. You clearly are in need of help if you believe that Abromavichs sins and those of the City backers are of no consequence and becasue others have deemed them to be fit an proper, well thats ok by you. Oh the irony indeed, far from being naive the article was telling and that, I suspect, is was you dislike as it hit home and touched a nerve. Classless CSKA Fulham all over.

Millhaven Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > if there have been Human rights abuses then that > should have been addressed by the fit and proper > persons panel who obviously don't care about these > matters as much as you or I do. Secondly you seem > to think there should be a sliding scale as to > whose sins are worse than others. I imagine people > struggling to find affordable housing in Liverpool > whilst the club just leave the area to become a > uninhabitable slum probably think that Liverpool > FC's sins are quite major or maybe they don't have > any rights. Still, while there is a foreign bogey > man/men to blame we can ignore it in the same way > the FA and Premiership ignore human right issues. Nothing to do with Johnny Foreigner, I'm from immigrant stock myself, its do with with robbing your own people and commiting human right abuses such as torture which I find unsavoury. Or perhaps because you support one of the particular clubs in question you find it hard to take and therefore need to defend? Arsenal were linked with a company which were also linked to human rights abuses and I screamed blue murder on the the blogs and fans websites about it, as I have no wish for a club I've supported for 45 years to get involved with such despicable behaviour. You're pasing the buck by saying it's down to those who decide who is "fit and proper", do you not have a conscience and mind of your own?

As for tonights game, I can't believe the co commentator on Sky said it was a "good watch"! Yeah, so good I switched to the Granada v Real Madrid game.