RosieH

GSJ57 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I just teared up a little for the Frenchman!! > Amazing match. Me too - zut alors, I wanted to give him un tout p'tit cuddle. Slightly heartbreaking.

Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You need a full stop at the end of that post > Rosie. "disgusting. really disgusting." You needed not to have a full stop at the end or in the middle of that post Mick.

Nary a drop PGC - I was merely referring to the american abomination that is "period" when what we're really talking about are "full stops"

Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > btw - you have too many periods in that sentence. And you thought bathroom break was disgusting...

How in hell is the winner going to play his next match?

Reports are that he faces a pauper's funeral. Facebook groups are suggesting people might like to donate...

You wouldn't be the first to remark that MM

LYM, the aim is to do it on your own street, or immediate vicinity - get to know your neighbours n that. That said, I'd be terribly interested in gatecrashing the Bellenden one - mighty impressive last year.

Excellent - now would either of you like to drive me places..?

I'm almost praying for the light to fail. Take pity oh mighty sun god, on these your indefatigable children...

I feel all kinds of inadequate. Holy f&ck, this is incredible.

Panic on the streets of Timperley. Sad.

My newly-restored itunes library - bloody bloody HURRAH (Danny Says - Ramones) - happy days

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > RosieH - the number of times I have taken Two > Little Boys to Lucky 7s and NOT played it is > shameful, bring it on ! July 1st - it's coming out!

Mushy peas = nectar of the gods (unless someone has tried to make them poncey by putting mint in them, in which case they're satan's diarhoea) I've been toying with the idea of Two Little Boys for some Lucky 7s action for a few months now, but thought it might not go down so well with anyone but me. I'm thrilled to stand corrected.

Cassius Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'd much prefer a premium paid for rucksacks over > a certain size, and people who feel that their > bag/blackberry/laptop is more worthy of a seat > than me or any other person (pregnant or not) > should pay a ticket for that item too. Ooh, there are days I'd gladly pay a premium for a double seat just for me and my handbag. Where can I sign up? Also think that people who stink of fags should have to pay a six-times premium, to create a little barrier of fresh air between them and the poor mugs who have to sit next to them. Thin people could get a discount if they're thin enough to cram three on a seat.

I was on crutches for a couple of months last year. Entirely (though accidentally) self-inflicted (Alice Cooper related living-room dancing injury) Now then Jack, was I more or less deserving of a seat than someone who went out (or stayed in) and got themselves deliberately knocked up? I'm wondering about the Russell Hierarchy of Need. I also suffer from vertigo, and might have an attack every couple of years or so. During such an attack (not self-inflicted) it might be more difficult for me to stand than say an old person (also not self-inflicted) or a pregnant woman (in all likelihood not self-inflicted but probably intentional). But there's no outward sign to indicate my seat-need. What oh what is the order of priority? Should I renounce my seat because I can't prove I need it? Help me oh wise one.

I've rather favour Ed Milliband myself, but worry he lacks the statesmanlike qualities needed to lead a party. Clearly Labour now has some time to practise, being in opposition and all, so he could develop thsoe skills, but I'm not sure that after Brown they'd choose an unphotogenic leader again (much as I loved him). Or would they?

Taste of his own medicine? Hardly. If your acolytes don't have the wit to see through your bullshit more fool them, but don't take the rest of us for the same kind of idiots.

I like this story - it's like Animal Rescue but with more intrigue and no Rolf Harris.

Biggest load of post-rationalisation crap I've ever read HAL. Staggeringly disingenuous. I apologise to Huguenot for unwittingly outing him on the forum - I'm pretty sure that he'd already talked about what he does (which is how I knew) but I forgot about HAL's dubious cyber-stalking pastimes. Pathetic.

HAL9000 Wrote: > Talk about hypocrisy! Talk about misrepresentation! For anyone reading, but not of a mind to look up the article in question, the above doesn't refer to Huguenot. HAL has simply chosen to smear Huguenot by dint of the fact that his comments appear in the same article. That's pretty despicable HAL. Edited because I realised that I unthinkingly colluded in HAL's spiteful cyber-stalking attempts to reveal the identiry of a fellow forumite, which I think is really low.

A lovely time was had by all. And there was lashings of ginger beer. And I think I might have told Quids he was very handsome. Oh god, I've also just remembered Citizen that I reminded you that I told you you were very handsome on our first meeting. Clearly I'm a whore of Babylon. (and apologies for the "he said, she said" nonsense - even Jesus got a bit cross on occasion)

I have the USA in the work sweepstake - should I be celebrating?

To be clear, I don't mind whether we meet or not - I simply wanted to make nice. But as I said, I will not be called a liar. I met you at the December drinks downstairs at Boho. Clearly either I'm not terribly memorable, or you were too drunk to remember, I've PMed you the details to jog your memory but you're still denying it. Hey ho. I'll go on Jeremy Kyle if you like. I'm choosing to think that you genuinely don't remember rather than are deliberately telling lies about me. It's a real pity you can't extend that same courtesy. Edited because people are right and all this "he said, she said" crap is unedifying in the extreme - my righteous indignation got the better of me - but I am keen to rise above the playground and make peace.