SCSB79

Dear Mr Mick Mac, You are clearly a man of honour, and this is a quality I admire in decent people. I find it admirable that you agree that McDonald should fall on his sword. He is a liar by admission and justice has prevailed. Now that we agree that lying really is the lowest of the low, I thought we may try and bridge the sectarian divide by engaging in some common sense by expanding on this common ground we hold. 1. Dr Reid stated that "every member of the green brigade who were involved in the recent poppy outrage would be banned from parkhead", since nothing has happened - I think we can agree that Mr Reid is a liar. 2. Stewart Regan lied to foreign referees because his job was on the line, he stated as much on tv. I think we can agree Mr Regan is a liar and that he should resign. 3. How was it an anti-catholic e-mail? The Vatican has shelled out hundreds of millions to victims of child abuse at the hands of their own, and it still continues to this day, ergo the email was factually correct. 4. Why, if Celtc are an all-encompassing club, who are not the bigots (its those nasty Proddies), would they be bothered about an e-mail with reference to catholics anyway? 5. Who are you going to blame now for poor results in Scotland, a la ICT at home yesterday? 6. The issue that sparked this mess was a referee making the correct decision. 7. Do you think Peter Lawwell should also be sacked for telling numerous lies? Such as a mystery trip to Japan at the end of the 07/08 campaign, and more recently for promising to ban the Green Brigade for their poppy protest. Do you think Lennon should have been thrown out of Scottish football for this sectarian rant After it's all done and dusted, what your club has achieved is petty, deflectionary antics. The Rangers are still Champions, still top of the league and you still have a p*ss poor squad and an incompetent hooligan for a manager. Kind Regards, SCSB79.

Won ?29 with a one pound bet on Dover to score the last goal of the day on Sky Sports Soccer Saturday. Nice.

A work friend is looking for recommendations for somewhere different and "funky" to get married in London. Any ideas?

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Oh b******s. Penalty deserved, though I don't > think it was a malicious tackle - Naismith seemed > to be going for the ball and completely oblivious > to Fabio (which is poor footballing anyway you > look at it). But did it have to be Rooney? He's > so damned smug! I thought there had to be "intent" to award a penalty? In that sense, Naismith was hard done by. However, we were very lucky not to have been penalised in the first few minutes for Davis' challenge on Berbatov, which I thought was a clear penalty. Miller had a couple of chances that could have changed the game. Real bonus tonight was seeing Hutton perform very well - a real prospect.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/scot_prem/9214212.stm

SCSB79 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Today's bets: > > Match to have more than 2 goals: > Bristol City, QPR, Brighton, Leyton Orient, > Walsall, Aldershot, Cheltenham and Port Vale @ ?2 > = ?300.50 winnings. > > I bet I win nothing!!! Darn - just 3 goals short, one each in three games. Oh well, next week!

Great results for the Bears in the SPL today too!!

Bang goes the goals in 25 minutes. 0-0 still in Dag&Red, Aldershot, Lincoln, Man U and Hull!

Today's bets: Match to have more than 2 goals: Coventry, QPR, Plymouth, Cheltenham and Shrewsbury @ ?5 = ?95.72 winnings. Bristol City, QPR, Brighton, Leyton Orient, Walsall, Aldershot, Cheltenham and Port Vale @ ?2 = ?300.50 winnings. Match to have a goal in the first 25 minutes: Man U, Hull, Charlton, Rochdale and Lincoln @ ?2 = ?50.51 winnings. Cardiff, Doncaster, Dag&Red, Aldershot, Lincoln, Celtic @ ?1 = ?57.12 winnings. I bet I win nothing!!!

Van der Vaart and Bale are two very special players.

DJKillaQueen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > What is next is resurfacing of the entirety of Rye > Lane....much needed I think all will agree. Is this definitely happening? As a cyclist who use Rye Lane almost every working day, this is great news.

Ant Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > iPhone 3GS on Orange. Mobile coverage is dodgy and > getting worse. 3G network is beyond bad, laughably > rubbish. I suggest avoiding it at all costs. I've > been with Orange for years and never had any > trouble until they started offering iPhones, after > which it all dropped off a cliff - I think their > network just isn't up to it. Shall be moving > elsewhere as soon as I'm out of contract. What Ant said. I'm with Orange and love the service (customer) I get, but the 3G reception is rubbish. Unfortunately I am not yet into the second year of a 2 year contract so got a long way to go. I've had bad experiences with Vodafone in the past and would never go back to them, so would maybe give O2 a shot seeing as they seem to have good 3G coverage.

Keef Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Why don't all of you just stop this before it gets > silly. > > Football people, football! Keef - it would be great if we could keep it to football... but was there any need for him to post such cr*p? Am I supposed to just sit and let them label me sectarian and racist and yet have no evidence to back that up? It is far too easy for people to throw these slurs around without challenge.

Emerson Crane Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > SCSB79 Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Emerson Crane Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Aston Villa 1 v Man Utd 2 > > > Man City 3 v Birmingham 1 > > > Newcastle 2 v Fulham 0 > > > Tottenham 1 v Blackburn 1 > > > West Ham 2 v Blackpool 2 > > > Wigan 1 v West Brom 2 > > > Wolverhampton 2 v Bolton 1 > > > Stoke 2 v Liverpool 2 > > > > > > Hardy har har - I hope you don't actually bet!! > > > No, but nor do I post sectarian poison on here > either. While my predictions may be amusing to > some, your sectarian rubbish isn't. Hardy har har - Yawwwwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnnnnn. As per my request to MM, please define ?sectarian? and link it back to any of my comments that exemplify the definitions.

Emerson Crane Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Aston Villa 1 v Man Utd 2 > Man City 3 v Birmingham 1 > Newcastle 2 v Fulham 0 > Tottenham 1 v Blackburn 1 > West Ham 2 v Blackpool 2 > Wigan 1 v West Brom 2 > Wolverhampton 2 v Bolton 1 > Stoke 2 v Liverpool 2 Hardy har har - I hope you don't actually bet!!

I often give the plastic casing above the keypad a little shake before using a cash point as this is where they hide the cameras I believe. Not yet had any luck finding one, but a guy in my office did and then got jumped by two blokes when he took the camera to hand in to the police. As giggirl says though, ALWAYS cover your PIN. Without it, I don't think anything can ever be done to you??

Hearts/Celtic finished 2-0. Thank god for the Jambo's as Rangers have been bloody awful tonight.

Offtttt.... Hearts 2 - Celtic 0 Rangers 0 - Hibs 2 Ledley and Neil Lennon off for Celtic. Rangers pi*h according to the radio.

Bit of a novice when it comes to betting... Does anyone do the game in Coral where you bet on a footy game having more than 2 goals in it? A friend of mine was 2 goals off winning ?750 last week from a ?5 bet. So thought I'd have a pop this weekend... ended up being 2 goals off winning ?375 from a ?5 bet... I think it seems an easier/more likely way of winning some cash than betting on the winner in 8 games???

Bluerevolution Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Celtic- controversy > http://i.imgur.com/CXm26.jpg Unfortunately one of the latest British soldiers to be brought home supports that team.

http://willievass.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/061110-Celtic-v-Abergreen/G0000HUGoC69ZIzs/I0000rTofGM7Iink Nice. Three penalties at home and an opposing player (ex Celtic player) sent off early doors. The agenda has worked!! ;-)

Ramble66 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > After we were burgled we had a visonic wireless > alarm fitted with vibration sensors on all the > windows and doors. This allows us to set the > 'home' setting at night with out the risk of > triggering the alarm. Highly recommend. Ramble - can I ask how much you paid and did you fit it yourself or get the experts in?

Correct Saen. I am not going to be stupid enough to say there are no bad apples amongst the Rangers support. There are plenty. I apologise if anyone thought I was labeling the entire Celtic support as republican filth, I wasn't.... gosh, dare I say it I even have a few Celtic supporting mates, who aren't all that bad!! I was trying to show "top to bottom"... the top being Desmond and Lawell and the bottom being those as stated. It quite simply isn't sectarianism, there are many republican supporters, who sing songs that have no place in football, and in my mind, they are reptiles. I am fully within my rights to voice my opinion, as is anyone on here. Your right MM, I do have issues. I have issues with people who openly voice their support for terrorist groups and sing songs about murdering British soldiers. I'd hope anyone would have issues with this. Anyway, it's an argument that no one will ever be able to win. So back to football.

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Is it as dull and annoying as your sectarian crap? I beg your pardon? Do be so kind as to point out my sectarianism.

Narnia Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm not a Celtic fan but SCSB79's remark is out of > order. Sorry you feel that way. But do you have any interest in Scottish football, any at all? Probably not. So you won't know what it's like hearing the Celtic support go on and on and on about oppression, agendas, bias... it is all a load of baloney.