Charles Notice

How very true

The officers sit in a room with a red pencil and draw lines on a map. Post a piece of paper on a lamp post and hope no one noticed what is happening Local pressure groups badger Cllrs and the thing gets passed. Most locals have no idea it happens. Join a local green or cycling pressure group and find out. Any thoughts on my comment made earlier on 11th December. Not surprised

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Anyone who uses this junction will know that the > sheep pens aren't working with children walking > and crossing around them. That others cross > diagonally when the green pedestrian phase isn't > long enough to do this. That cars turning right > out of Townley Road conflict with cyclists going > south and often those cars appear to jump the > start of their red light phase. > Southwark Council has a safety audit which says > the junction isn't safe. > TfL money has provided the money to upgrade this > junction. > > The main angst is the proposal to ban the right > turn. Hopefully everyone has responded to the > consultation so their views can be collated. > > Please do also put 7-9pm 28 January in your > diaries to attend the Dulwich Community Council > where this scheme will be debated and questions > can be asked. If one takes the time to read the official Southwark report on safety for this junction as mentioned by hopskip you might draw a different conclusion regarding safety. Maps show all Please read and ask why?

This consultation is as useful as a condom with the top cut off. Thus junction has been there since my childhood perhaps people should grow up and use common sense. It seems that new imports have a very silly and precious view of life that is silly. Use common sense.

The officers sit in a room with a red pencil and draw lines on a map. Post a piece of paper on a lamp post and hope no one noticed what is happening Local pressure groups badger Cllrs and the thing gets passed. Most locals have no idea it happens. Join a local green or cycling pressure group and find out.

No his brother who has amended his post

BrandNewGuy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The French spend on average 13.4% of their > dispoable income on food. In Italy it's 14.4%, > while in the UK it's 8.9%. > http://wsm.wsu.edu/researcher/wsmaug11_billions.pd > f Probably they have more money in their pockets than rip off Britain

Has Cllr Barber requested this report as mention in an earlier post on the 6th December

nxjen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > When Southwark Council first distributed wheelie > bins, I guess over 20 years ago now, a leaflet was > also distributed that instructed residents to > wheel their bins to the boundary of their > properties on each collection day. Clearly this > turned out to be a bit of a lost cause but as > regards returning bins to their proper places, the > refuse collection service outline > http://www.southwark.gov.uk/a_to_z/service/357/ref > use_-_household_waste_-_collection states > "collectors will put your bin back within the > boundary of your property after emptying it", > nothing about returning it to their correct > places. It's reasonable to expect though that > they are not left in such a way to cause an > obstruction. Or advertise that there is no one in all day to one and all.

Why not extend it till the New Year when people have more time?

Could you get and post a copy of this audit.Would make sense.

Do these coaches actually block the junction and block the view of traffic? Common sense is needed which seems to be badly lacking.

The teachers have always parked close to the school without any problems. The junction has always been there and there has always been a right turn. Most older established residents have always managed to use this junction safely. What has changed apart from a silly plan from Southwark Council. Which opinion has shown to be against it. Leave in peace For cyclists the option is to dismount if they fear they are in danger.

Agreed. Still a local place

But it always puddles there whenever it rains. Protecting properties just clean the drains and sewers

It should have been your link Sorry

intexasatthe moment Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > This one > ?https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/William+Hill/ > @51.4574061,-0.071182,3a,52.5y,121h,90t/data=!3m4! > 1e1!3m2!1sKcfIzUDyIYTpngq7Y_7fUw!2e0!4m9!1m6!2m5!1 > sbetting+shop!3m3!1sbetting+shop!2s42+Hindmans+Rd, > +London+SE22!3s0x487603be18b649b3:0x8381980c9759e4 > 7!3m1!1s0x4876039607b48ea3:0xb8fef3d2e09cdb7b!6m1! > 1e1 If it is this a house would complete the row of house as they were originally built. The key is in your post "returned to a home" Are you for or against?

DulvilleRes Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > 'The real problem with DE is that they have been > misinformed or badly advised as to their purpose > as a charity. DE seem to think their primary > purpose is profit maximisation at the expense of > everyone else to fund the private schools. If it > is behaving like a commercial property developer > it should be taxed like one'. > > Couldn't agree more Dadadada > > I'm doing some digging as to what exactly > constitutes charitable status. Dulwich Estate is > looking more like a tax avoidance racket to me > than a charity - it is a brilliant virtuous circle > of raising cash free tax in Dulwich, giving it to > the private schools, who in turn don't pay any tax > on their operations because of the Dulwich Estate > charity bursaries. Along they way the Estate pay > themselves a very generous, no risk management fee > - over ?1.1 million in salaries. A great little > gravy train that just keeps puffing round and > round. > > I've recently worked with a proper charity, one > staffed virtually exclusively by volunteers (most > of whom are on moderate to low personal incomes), > who actually go out and save lives, and their > total running costs are less than the Dulwich > Estate's wage bill. The Estate just look rotten > and shabby in comparison. Anyone out there with > an expertise in the law surrounding charity? > > JL - As regards the SG Smith development, not sure > that it will be slam dunk for the Estate. It was > certainly looking that way in the summer, but > there is widespread resistance to large facets of > the plans, not least of all because of concerns > about heritage, flooding, density, a huge > undergorund car park and the fact that parts of > the Dulwich Estate/ SG Smith pitch are pure > fiction. The Calton Avenue and Gilkes Residents > Associations have been very active, and various > other bodies in the borough are beginning to wake > up to what is going on. The Estate clearly hoped > to smash the application through by sheer force of > planning bullish*t and momentum, but bit by bit, > their application is getting unpicked and exposed > for what it is. Lets hope it continues this way. What is the name of this wonderful organisation. The charity you worked for

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Near misses shouldnt be ignored. Classic H&S > pyramid. > Lots of near misses, a number of slight injuries, > a few serious injuries and the thankfully > occassional death. > If you can reduce the near misses then you reduce > the occurences of more serioues events. An ED near miss is another's Grand Canyon. Why can't all be aware.

I took the train to LB and looked at this proposed route, think it is a pipe dream in someone's imagination. Cannot see how it will be possible. May look good always on paper but reality is some what different. Street performers, micro food stores ?

If I was this 13 year old it would confirm th?t Many adults are real ars.holes.

Would removing the benches outside the pub also be on the agenda? Clearing up the visual mess. Parked cycles are move of an eyesore

Wrong thread

Moving vehicles of all types The road Pedestrians The pavement Crossing the road. Eyes left and right and common sense from all. Pedestrians and vehicle owners Not difficult to understand

LondonMix Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > LL has a few salons. I'm sure you could get > extensions if you wanted. White people where > extensions too! > > Louisa Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Rye Lane has not one estate agent, coffee shop > or > > curry house (someone correct me if I'm wrong), > and > > it is a retail space at least twice the length > and > > girth of Lordship Lane. Equally, LL does not > have > > one signal hair extension shop or exotic food > > store (someone correct me if I'm wrong). *Bob* > I > > think you could be onto something here. We > could > > have a pop-up exchange store event. > > > > Louisa. This exchange was suggested at the very start of this thread Perhaps the residents of Ed with the perhaps backing of Cllr Barber could extend the hand of friendship and and put in place a relocation plan that makes sure all those displaced would be offered any empty shops on LL at affordable rents Why should Peckham have all these wonderful businesses LL does lack Nailshops. hair extension shops opened fronted meat and fish shops and masses of rubbish. This could turn LL in a shopping destination Peckham residents need better.