BrandNewGuy

No, they were paid stewards not volunteers.

This thread on Urban75 gives you the background: https://www.urban75.net/forums/threads/stewardgate-dulwich-hamlets-long-serving-servants-unceremoniously-elbowed-out.346629/

High prices, poor stock control, rude staff, huge queues, rotten fruit and veg...

It's a modern murder ballad, in the tradfition of "Pretty Polly", "Long Lankin", "In The Pines" and "Hey Joe". The public loves a juicy murder and rightly takes little or no offence.

I've never seen Star Wars, I can't ride a bike and I've never been to Westminster Abbey.

This is the reason why family bags of peanuts are a bad idea. A very bad, bloaty idea.

Yes, the rail franchise system is crap, but passenger numbers are twice what they were at privatisation. It's difficult to see successive governments having made the necessary investment in British Rail over that time to cope with that growth. After all, governments had been cutting rail investment for years. And yes, Southern is abysmal but most services aren't - though the fare system is crap too.

The retail footfall near the Plough is nowhere near enough for WHSmith. Yes, they do well at airprorts and stations, but high street is not so good for them these days, and only the ones with very high footfall do well. Mind you, a newsagent that concentrated on a really comprehensive range of magazines would be good on LL.

eddeal1 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > southwark council have been selling not only land. > they have been Selling 100s and 100s and 100s of > houses and flats through Andrew Roberts auctions > for Years.and All of you were Sleeping. Not really. It's been discussed on this forum for at least two years how Southwark's policy under Labour is that any council tenancy which falls vacant and the property is deemed to be worth more than ?300K is to be sold rather than being offered to another tenant. This is utter madness and can only lead to increased ghettoisation of both rich and poor. We're lucky living in a road in ED that is diverse as there are a number of council houses as well as flats, in addition to private houses and flats. If it were all private, we'd be proper la-di-da...

Cherry Tree, EDT - or even better, the club bar :-)

Drivers! Don't waste thousands on expensive vanity plates. Simply change your name by deed poll to HJ08 TRW.

Pugwash Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Details were published in the local papers a week > or so ago. But nothing at local bus stops or in TFL's weekend travel update, which the original closure was.

Due to the crane at KCH being dismantled and removed, Denmark Hill is closed to traffic this weekend. There wasn't much publicity about this - got caught out trying to get a non-existent bus from Denmark Hill station yesterday evening. https://www.kch.nhs.uk/news/public/news/view/20863

rendelharris Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Abe_froeman Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Five seconds is five seconds longer for the > buses > > to wait! Didn't TFL even pay for that junciton? > > I don't know who paid for it, I would guess > Southwark but TfL may have contributed to the > cycling infrastructure. The money was from TFL, from a fund partitioned off by Boris for improvements relating specifically to cycling. Southwark didn't spend a penny of their own cash on the junction, but couldn't resist the idea of spending ?200,000 of someone else's money.

"Apple cider"

One of my regular podcasts has an excellent episode this week discussing race, violence and BLM in the USA. Well worth your time: https://www.samharris.org/podcast/item/racism-and-violence-in-america

Cock and balls graffiti on the wall at the corner of Champion Hill and Grove Lane. Old skool.

Our summer holiday in 1976 was in Cheltenham (yeah, great...) house sitting for friends. My big sister had the recently released Beach Boys "20 Golden Greats" on tape which we played incessantly. As our holiday accommodation was free, we ate out most nights, which was a novelty ? garlic mushrooms! Whitebait! Avocado pears! To this day, when I hear "Surfin' USA" I think of 70s bistro-style food.

... Only ruined by Elton John and Kiki Dee being No. 1 the whole bloody summer.

titch juicy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Wren pecked Weeell, you'll find that the male usually has more than one special lady, so none of them has the moral high ground :-)

This morning's crush was made worse by another Forest Hill sinkhole appearing, which affected all services into London Bridge, directly or indirectly. Not likely to improve before tonight's rush hour.

Foxes have young cubs at this time of year, so are much more cautious when out and about - until the cubs get a bit more streetwise :-)

Yes - at each of the exhibitions of the proposed plans. The school says it will have a transport plan which I'm guessing will be similar to that in the planning application, but the two need not be the same.

Jules-and-Boo wrote (on the other thread): >yes it is about the Health Cente, but I do just want to say - my daughter's going to the new school and - as the >temporary school is on a different site - the school are encouraging >1) parents / teachers to lead groups of cyclists to the school >2) teachers to meet the children at key bus stops to walk together >3) school bus for those who live far....pick up from the ED Site > >There is NOTHING which encourages driving...AT ALL. > >I think the new school is brilliant and I'm looking foward to the site being used properly. > >Back to the Health Centre (sorry - but I think the parking is a distraction) The parking is not a distraction. There will likely be a major impact on local roads when the long-term site is up and running. This does not mean I'm 'against' the school, it means that we have to look at the detail of the planning application. Once it moves from the temporary site, most pupils will be very local, so there will not necessarily be a great impact from them being driven to school (unlike the local private schools which take in from far and wide), but what about the teaching and other staff? How many of the 140 will use public transport? And what will the school do to discourage driving among staff and visitors? These are perfectly legitimate questions for locals to ask.

I'll answer this on the other thread :-)