Mick Mac

Celtic 1 Liverpool 0 in Dublin last night.

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > So if Fenerbah?e are kicked out, do Arsenal get a > pass? Pass

UEFA Champions League play-off draw League route Olympique Lyonnais (FRA) v Real Sociedad de F?tbol (ESP) FC Schalke 04 (GER) v FC Metalist Kharkiv (UKR) FC Pa?os de Ferreira (POR) v FC Zenit St Petersburg (RUS) PSV Eindhoven (NED) v AC Milan (ITA) Fenerbah?e SK (TUR) v Arsenal FC (ENG) Champions route GNK Dinamo Zagreb (CRO) v FK Austria Wien (AUT) PFC Ludogorets Razgrad (BUL) v FC Basel 1893 (SUI) FC Viktoria Plze? (CZE) v NK Maribor (SVN) FC Shakhter Karagandy (KAZ) v Celtic FC (SCO) FC Steaua Bucure?ti (ROU) v Legia Warszawa (POL) The participation of Fenerbah?e SK and FC Metalist Kharkiv in the competition is subject to pending disciplinary and CAS proceedings.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Girls cut and finish ?53. > > Seems they don't cater for women or apostrophes. Maybe the apostrophe is not appropriate PGC, in a Sweeney Todd sort of way.

I have a list of 8 backed from the off - Rory, Zach, Hunter, Henrik, Brandt, Bill (Haas), Billy (Horschel), Paul (Casey). Most are going ok so far and great to see Tiger make a poor start.

What Mr Ben said. It pays to do your own research, ask around, establish your own appetite to risk etc. Read the money sections of the papers, "Google" how to bulid a balance protfolio. Pensions/Investments websites and funds supermarkets will give summaries of funds to invest in, reflecting past performance, risk of the investment etc. Fund supermarkets allow you to buy into these investments with no fees, as you gave not taken advice, so don't assume you need to pay to access certain investments. Personally I wouldn't use one because investment is a very personal thing and if I was going to make a mistake I'd rather get it wrong on my own to be honest. Advice would be invaluable if you risking your money on derivitive investments/ETFs etc. but thats generally for aggressive investors.

I heard this morning that the goal line technology is being tested at the Emirates of all places. True. But they are still passing it around, and it might be some time before they actually get a shot in. (All my own work - I'm here all week)

Arsenal could face PSV or Fenerbahce in Champions League play-off... but Celtic have got it easy UEFA president Michel Platini's desire to see more domestic title-holders in the Champions League leaves Arsenal facing a tough task to qualify for the group stages. League winners such as Celtic are kept apart from non-league winners like Arsenal, with five places each up for grabs in the 'champions' and 'non-champions' routes. Both Arsenal and Celtic are seeded for Friday's draw in Nyon, meaning that they have the perceived advantage of playing their second legs at home Who could Arsenal and Celtic play? Arsenal: PSV Eindhoven (Holland), Fenerbahce (Turkey), Real Sociedad (Spain), Metalist Kharkiv (Ukraine), Pacos de Ferreira (Portugal). Celtic: Austria Vienna (Austria), Legia Warsaw (Poland), Maribor (Slovenia), Ludogorets Razgrad (Bulgaria) and Shakhter Karagandy (Kazakhstan . Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2386591/Champions-League-play-draw-Arsenal-face-PSV-Fenerbahce.html#ixzz2bMfBLJQJ Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

giggirl Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Why not print up some advertisements of your own > for, I dunno, a bake sale or something, and run > down Lordship Lane fly posting them on all the > estate agents' windows. Turn the tables so to > speak. Nice one GG.

Mick Mac Wrote: -----------------------------------------------------. > > Apparently thats the whole problem (thats if you > can believe anything Suarez says!) in that he saysr > that within that contract last year, it allows him > to leave after a year to a champions league club > if liverpool failed to get into it, which they did > fail to do. > > A cheat will always look out for himself and > likely does not give a toss about anyone else. > Exciting footballer though, which makes it even > more of a shame. > > Steve Nicol on talksport last night said that the > manager had let Suaraz down by not (so far) > honouring the contract terms! I wonder why Nicol > might want to undermine the current manager? Rogers comes out fighting. Says there were absolutely no guarantees given to Suarez last year . Says Suarez has tried to tarnish the reputation of the club and he will take decisive action.

ratty Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > A local (then) photographer did this some time > ago. (2008?) My missus is in the book / video. > > http://www.jennywicksphotography.co.uk/#Root-Ginge > r-1 One of those babies is definately wearing a wig.

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- I also get that Suarez wants to play at the > very highest level of club football, it's just the > way he's conducted himself which stinks, plus he > signed a new deal a year ago. Apparently thats the whole problem (thats if you can believe anything Suarez says!) in that he says that within that contract last year, it allows him to leave after a year to a champions league club if liverpool failed to get into it, which they did fail to do. A cheat will always look out for himself and likely does not give a toss about anyone else. Exciting footballer though, which makes it even more of a shame. Steve Nicol on talksport last night said that the manager had let Suaraz down by not (so far) honouring the contract terms! I wonder why Nicol might want to undermine the current manager?

Good luck Charlie - hope things continue to improve.

Its funny how the G-word has dropped out of the common vocabulary. My daughter, a redhead, has hardly ever heard the word.

I stand corrected. Hope it goes well.

That's a great line. I must use that one. And I know just the person.

Bellenden is East Dulwich anyway. Don't give me any cr*p about postcodes.

david_carnell Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm with Quids and Jah on this. > > When places like the Oglander, Hoopers and other > pubs are being turned into shoe box flats it's > crazy that bars are trying to cram into small > former shops. There is a difference between a pub and a bar of course. Most openings these days are bars rather than pubs. Bars are small space ventures and are popular currently. Big open pubs are no longer what people want. I'm afraid thats just the way it is. You might do better opening yet another bar next door to the Draft House than you would trying to get hoopers to work as many people like to be able to move from bar to bar/pub on a night out hence LL does well as its "bar central", a focal point for people to have a whole evening out. Also on LL people like to people watch - you cant do a lot of that at Hoopers.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I've never been in favour of the review system: I > think despite the inevitable fallibility of the > umpires, a little bit of the spirit of the game > has been taken away. > > But then I'm just a soppy romantic. Technology has worked well in tennis. But there seem to be too many moving uncertainties in cricket. Having said that, the hawkeye lbw decision making process shows how many decisions there are within one lbw decision and its surely very difficult for an umpire to get that right regularly - so hawkeye for lbw i would keep. Hotspot on the other hand seems to be under scrutiny with players allegedly applying something to the bat so it doesn't show - its days look numbered.

Accepted :)

david_carnell Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I did. You said: > > "Organic meats, fish, veg and home comforts in a > safe environment by day in East Dulwich" > > Implying that a) Peckham isn't safe and b) this > disparate group of people you've conveniently > lumped together don't shop there. > You must be paranoid. I implied nothing of the sort. East dulwich people shop in ED as is to be expected from the place they chose to buy a home - but more and more of them seem to head to peckham for their nightlife.

My post was about people from East Dulwich socialising in Peckham. Quote the correct post please.

Jah Lush Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'll wager most of the people who have recently > moved to Peckham don't shop there. They shop in > East Dulwich. And it seems that a lot of the people who recently moved to East Dulwich now socialise in Peckham. Organic meats, fish, veg and home comforts in a safe environment by day in East Dulwich, edgy vibes by night in Peckham.

Well done England.

david_carnell Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Something to consider is when you need it for i.e > time of day. > > If it's lunchtime, they'll need to be onsite super > early to get it fired up and begin roasting the > beast. It takes about 6 hours. I reckon they bring it mostly roasted and just finish it off at the venue an hour or so before serving. Saw it done in South Africa.