Mick Mac

Left eye? Surely?

A single man would not let his chin degenerate into that sort of state. And only one ear, that's bad too.

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ...silent in the car Yes, that "interference" seems to arise just as Radio5 decides to allocate 2mins of its daily broadcast to talk about your club. I think its a 6th sense woman have.

It read a bit like a "Who's who" of the EDF....although not particularly complimentary.

well thats not how it came across declan. But dont stop posting just because people challenge you. You need a thick skin, like the rest of us. Half the fun is in defending yourself.

Declan. Sarcastically asking admin if he is going to ban himself for making a remark that you imply could be construed as racist and using capital letters, is in my view having a strong pop at admin. Thats how i understood your post and thats why i commented on it. But correct me if you meant something else.

declan. Taking the mickey is not and has never been racist to my knowledge. Anyway noone should have a pop at admin. Its his forum.

Good luck BBW.

RosieH Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > I know, I know, but I'm poorly and I'm not > dressed. Oh - I think we can spare some washing powder Rosie. Now where do you live again?

Jeez - they must have been so disappointed to wait all that time - and when the plane doors opended it was just a bunch of raggy scousers.

I recommend dishwasher tablets. That should make your clotes squeaky clean.

Keef Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > All the arguements for it in the programme, like > "it's justice", "it's about protecting our > children"... What a load of bollocks. How is > killing the person, protecting the children, once > the crime has already been committed? > Well it obviously prevents them from committing further crimes on innocent children. Peadophiles tend to be reintroduced into society and we are not aware of where they live. I'm not in favour of the death penalty, but for peadophiles, it should be life and life should mean life.

Not much.

Get officer McNulty on the case. Same thing happended on The Wire.

GregI Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > p.s. is there a cobbler on Lordship Lane (no smart > comments suggesting the east dulwich deli allowed) Merryfields is a shoe maker/mender near ED train station - very good in my experience. (They even do handmade shoes if you have far too much money or if machine made shoes are not good enough for you.)

Rip and Fame and Glory to race again next year after poor finishes to season.

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > - can hold down a job - check > - isn't addicted to any chemical substances - > check > - knows how to AND CAN cook - check > - isn't a woman beater - check, > - own hair and teeth - check > - Hasn't got a gambling problem - BOLLOX Eh - and married with 2 qkids - don't forget that bit Quids. Sometimes woman think thats quite important. Although if the gambling gets much worse, one problem might solve the other.

Fire in pudding lane - wake up.

Is it true the Mother had a call from GB to discuss this and that she recorded the call on her Blackberry? (and he said sorry about 10 times during the call but she said this was not an apology) She was obviously intending to / hoping to get him into further bother. But then again she has lost her son and who are we to judge what she thinks fit and proper to do.

If there is intent to commit a foul, it's a foul. That is why intent is important. But I did not see it, so no idea on the specific incident.

Ted Max Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Do you actually have to touch someone for it to be > a foul? > > Does anyone know the answer to this? Contact is not necessary Ted - "kicks or attempts to kick"/"trips or attempts to trip" is an offence - if there is no contact its seems to rest on intent. Laws - see page 32

LegalEagle-ish Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ok, Tog, you look like a bit of an action man, and > not bad looking either, so please complete the > following checklist: > > - can hold down a job > - isn't addicted to any chemical substances > - knows how to cook > - isn't a woman beater > - Hasn't got a gambling problem > - own hair and teeth I own hair and teeth - but I leave them beside the bed each night - is that ok?

I have one: Don't bet large amounts of money on Rip van Winkle - he's a donkey.

Yes its funny how some people assume everyone else gets their opinions from Sky Sports or the tabloids. People are capable of independent thought.

Annasfield Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Maybe O'Neill would come, but he's a yes man and I > would never want him here. Thats news to me Anna - Martin O'Neill a yes man - you are having a laugh. > Mick, i'm still waiting for your tactical football > manager genius on what you'd have done differently > last night? Look at the EDF Super Liga FF table and see evidence my management genius - I have brought a poor team from bottom to 6th - so I think you have to accept I know what I am talking about when it comes to management. I'm on your tail.