daizie

LegalEagle-ish Wrote: -------------------------------------------------------> > > For me I wasn't threatned by TSL I just found his > constant references and dodgy analysis of race > upsetting. I was married to my black ex-husband > for 12 yrs and have two mixed race kids. I was > called ni**er lover and other pleasantries by some > on the estate I lived on (until I kicked the shit > out of someone) and I suppose I may be more > sensitive to comments on race as a result. I had > the usual, having to hide my husband in order to > hail a cab, women hiding their purse etc as he > approached and funny looks when we were out so my > antennae might be slightly more attuned than > someone who hasn't had those experiences. Legal, this could be interpreted as a touch of the old paranoia and/or looking for a scapegoat or a fight. This is only a suggestion, but given your aggression and violence surely one can be excused for wondering .

Any one watching ? bless their hearts ..

Cereal grain?

Absolutely ????'s . Id like to see some evidence. NOT someones ' paranoia, fear, hurt feelings, past experiences/ history, or wanting a scapegoat' . *Taps fingers on desk* hold on , no, I actually have a hedge to trim .

Absolutely ????'s . Id like to see some evidence. NOT someones ' paranoia, fear, hurt feelings, past experiences/ history, or wanting a scapegoat' . *Taps fingers on desk* hold on , no, I actually have a hedge to trim .

How ironic .. LegalEagles-ish wrote.. Are you sure you are not just trying to get a > personal shot in to try to bolster your argument? > If so, that is an indication that you have moved > from any logical argument to the kind of tactics > TLS was being accused of. A personal shot ? No, I would never get personal . Iv'e never needed to and dont intend to start . I have a sense of fairness and dont like decent people being accused of things they've never done . That's it . I actually quite like you, we have a number of things in common . However, on the TLS subject, I think you are wrong. You said on another thread that he 'reminded you of people you used to know' . Being 'reminded' of things is no basis for calling people racist and typing obscenities , which you did . As soon as you rant and swear you lose any respect . Aside from you producing no evidence . Show us something new .

How ironic .. LegalEagles-ish wrote.. Are you sure you are not just trying to get a > personal shot in to try to bolster your argument? > If so, that is an indication that you have moved > from any logical argument to the kind of tactics > TLS was being accused of. A personal shot ? No, I would never get personal . Iv'e never needed to and dont intend to start . I have a sense of fairness and dont like decent people being accused of things they've never done . That's it . I actually quite like you, we have a number of things in common . However, on the TLS subject, I think you are wrong. You said on another thread that he 'reminded you of people you used to know' . Being 'reminded' of things is no basis for calling people racist and typing obscenities , which you did . As soon as you rant and swear you lose any respect . Aside from you producing no evidence . Show us something new .

LegalEagle-ish Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I have very few insecurities, less than most > people in fact, and am baffled at what any > insecurities I may or may not have, has to do with > this thread. But more than me . > > Are you sure you are not just trying to get a > personal shot in to try to bolster your argument? > If so, that is an indication that you have moved > from any logical argument to the kind of tactics > TLS was being accused of. > No im sure . > Like I said above, I think the evidence is there, > it's just not blatantly packaged in a nice bundle > with a bow on for you. It's spread out over his > many long winded and often amusing, but usually > offensive posts. > As a Legal 'person', you would know that there is no case without evidence . Prove it . > >

LegalEagle-ish Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I have very few insecurities, less than most > people in fact, and am baffled at what any > insecurities I may or may not have, has to do with > this thread. But more than me . > > Are you sure you are not just trying to get a > personal shot in to try to bolster your argument? > If so, that is an indication that you have moved > from any logical argument to the kind of tactics > TLS was being accused of. > No im sure . > Like I said above, I think the evidence is there, > it's just not blatantly packaged in a nice bundle > with a bow on for you. It's spread out over his > many long winded and often amusing, but usually > offensive posts. > As a Legal 'person', you would know that there is no case without evidence . Prove it . > >

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Well sorry for being so vitriolic, I was in a bad > mood. I found him very menacing, but in hindsight > I appreciate my visceral reaction to him may have > highlighted the worst interpretation of his > intent. So you were in a bad mood ? Jog on

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Well sorry for being so vitriolic, I was in a bad > mood. I found him very menacing, but in hindsight > I appreciate my visceral reaction to him may have > highlighted the worst interpretation of his > intent. So you were in a bad mood ? Jog on

LegalEagle-ish Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Daizie - what insecurities? Only you can tell us that . I repeat, where is the evidence of his racism ?

LegalEagle-ish Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Daizie - what insecurities? Only you can tell us that . I repeat, where is the evidence of his racism ?

Im not . Id say that was down to your own insecurities . Where is the evidence ?

Im not . Id say that was down to your own insecurities . Where is the evidence ?

Its because she's got a right growler

Its because she's got a right growler

Yeah, a lovely bit of sausage

Yeah, a lovely bit of sausage

I have a PM from TLS too . Id say Huguenob is a Liar .

I have a PM from TLS too . Id say Huguenob is a Liar .

What about thamesribexperience.com ? Someone on the forum recommended it to me , and it was great fun . p.s Just thought, maybe not in this weather .

Agree with you ????'s. Uncomfortable with the TLS ban too. I did'nt find BBW offensive, he made me laugh . In my opinion there are far too many sensitive souls on the forum . If he had offended I would just choose not to read his posts, not report him. No one is forced to read posts . To me its like telling tales. Snitchy and childish. I just know id have nothing in common with people who do this, in real life . However, I can understand admins decision. I know that trying to run anything takes dedication and hard work that others dont see, and you dont need the aggro that goes with it .

The Soham murderer?

Leagle, is that an un -extended pole dancing pole in the background ?