pk

For suggesting you were leave Not for calling you a bullshiter

Hemingway Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Er, Yes. I voted remain in the referendum Apologies

Hemingway Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I?m voting green you @#$%& You remain now then?

Hemingway Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ?who you voting for this without flaws? > > Islamaphobia ok?? > > Don?t think the Green Party have form on this. > > you?re so tribal that anyone who criticise the > Labour Party is a Tory. I asked a question You draw a false conclusion And didn?t answer the question What a bullshiter

Hemingway Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The squirming and contortions on social media by > people who claim to be non-racists to justify > voting for an institutionally anti-Semitic party > which is frightening British jews is a sight to > behold today. Clearly anti-semitism doesn't really > count as racism for huge number of laughably > labelling themselves 'progressives' . Rank, > hypocrites..makes me want to puke. So who you voting for this without flaws? Islamaphobia ok?

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > and this one should try the hospitals in eastern > Europe where I know for a fact you have to bribe > staff to get anything Sounds like one of your ?facts? as in something you?ve made up to spread lies about other countries and their people

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Rockets Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Seabag - to be fair, a lot of people think this > > all started when Labour elected Ed rather than > > David to the leadership role which gifted the > > Tories the election in 2015....if David had > been > > elected it all could have all turned out oh so > > differently.... > > Yes and if Boris had been the PM instead of that > turncoat traitor May- we would be OUT by now You do know boris?s deal was voted on in parliament? And he failed

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > pk Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > uncleglen Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > All of the above designed to glean votes. Not > > > tricky- avoid at all costs > > > > > > What an idiot you are too > > You would say that- just as you probably said in > your ignorance of anything going on outside the > bubble of champagne socialism in June 2016 that > people who voted to Leave are stupid and > racist... > The fact that you do not understand the Raven poem > is proof that you have no clue. Zero facts again What an idiot again

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > pk Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > DulwichFox Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Captain Marvel > > > > > > Judging by replies to your lengthy post... > > > > > > Corbyn seems to have to have at least 3 > > > supporters in East Dulwich > > > I can see a Landslide Victory. > > > > > > Fox > > > > So you don?t think labour will win seats > locally? > > They probably will win seats locally? > > There are a lot of Champagne Socialists who own 2 > - 3 bedroom terraced houses 'worth' ??? ?900,000 > living in East Dulwich who have a Raven on their > roof. > > The Raven > > > The raven on the roof closed one eye > Preened himself against the sky > Picked his beak with a crooked claw > And settled down to wait once more > > In the house beneath the family sat > Tossing goldfish to the cat > TV dinners on their knee > And forty-nine lights on the Xmas tree > > Father?s made a lot of bread > "Someone?s got to make guns" father said > "We know it?s all right and there?s the proof" > "Our house has got a raven on the roof" > > "The next door neighbours, they are a joke" > "They cultivate a garden which they smoke" > "And send their kids to the local schools" > "They must be growing up a bunch of fools" > > "The next door neighbours haven?t a cent" > "We own our house but they pay rent" > "Property owners should remain aloof" > "Especially when they?ve got a raven on their > roof" > > When father was fifty he fell ill > Mother puts the crumbs on the window-sill > Like she usually did, but he died in pain > And they found he had a raven in his brain > > > Copyright: Andy Roberts I?m pretty sure not even you know what you?re on about!

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Captain Marvel > > Judging by replies to your lengthy post... > > Corbyn seems to have to have at least 3 > supporters in East Dulwich > I can see a Landslide Victory. > > Fox So you don?t think labour will win seats locally?

Captain Marvel Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > pk and the devil. It must be a full moon Why are you so happy to spread BS that you know is BS? Or are you too stupid to know it?s BS?

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > All of the above designed to glean votes. Not > tricky- avoid at all costs What an idiot you are too

Captain Marvel Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I knew that one would get you going What an idiot you are

dulwichbloke Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > pk Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > dulwichbloke Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Nothing to see here, move along now... > > > > > > 70 serving and former Labour staff members > have > > > now come forward as whistleblowers to the > EHRC. > > > > > > This has just appeared on Sky news: > > > > > > At a press conference held by JLM and its > > lawyers > > > on Friday, whistleblower Sam Matthews, who > was > > > head of disputes at Labour, said the > > "intolerable" > > > problem of antisemitism within the party had > > left > > > him considering taking his own life. > > > > > > Lord Falconer of Thoroton, a former Labour > > Justice > > > Secretary, said he has "the gravest concerns" > > > about Mr Corbyn's leadership after the > "utterly > > > damning" dossier. > > > > > > He told The Times: "It's a leadership issue > > which > > > the leadership should have dealt with. > > > > > > "I believe it to be utterly damning of the > > Labour > > > Party. It shows strong evidence of an > > > institutional attempt to sweep under the > carpet > > > evidence of antisemitism." > > > > > > Endorse this by voting Labour by all means, > if > > > your conscience is 'flexible' enough and you > > can > > > also persuade yourself that if a party is > > capable > > > of this, other groups in society that they > > dislike > > > would not be next if they got into power. > > > > > > I'm not Jewish, but I won't be voting Labour > > again > > > while Momentum/Corbyn and his apologists are > in > > > charge. > > > > Have you always put a lot of weight on the > views > > of Sam Matthews and Lord Falconer? > > Is there any reason you know of why I shouldn?t? > Falconer is a former Labour Justice minister and > one of the leading barristers in a generation (I > think he is well used to evaluating evidence) and > Matthews is the former Head of Investigations for > the Labour Party. I have no idea of their > religion (if any) - is that something you are > referring to, or do you have some insight that > I?ve missed. > > Oh, and 70 Labour staff (not just members) who are > whistleblowers. 70! Are they all making it up too? Given that they?re such serious individuals, I just wondered whether you respect their views on other things, or just on antisemitism in the Labour Party?

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > I didn't listen to ANY of the claims by either > side during the run up to the referendum Sounds about right

dulwichbloke Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Nothing to see here, move along now... > > 70 serving and former Labour staff members have > now come forward as whistleblowers to the EHRC. > > This has just appeared on Sky news: > > At a press conference held by JLM and its lawyers > on Friday, whistleblower Sam Matthews, who was > head of disputes at Labour, said the "intolerable" > problem of antisemitism within the party had left > him considering taking his own life. > > Lord Falconer of Thoroton, a former Labour Justice > Secretary, said he has "the gravest concerns" > about Mr Corbyn's leadership after the "utterly > damning" dossier. > > He told The Times: "It's a leadership issue which > the leadership should have dealt with. > > "I believe it to be utterly damning of the Labour > Party. It shows strong evidence of an > institutional attempt to sweep under the carpet > evidence of antisemitism." > > Endorse this by voting Labour by all means, if > your conscience is 'flexible' enough and you can > also persuade yourself that if a party is capable > of this, other groups in society that they dislike > would not be next if they got into power. > > I'm not Jewish, but I won't be voting Labour again > while Momentum/Corbyn and his apologists are in > charge. Have you always put a lot of weight on the views of Sam Matthews and Lord Falconer?

SpringTime Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > diable rouge Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > Diane Abacus is also > largely off the radar at the minute. The woman is > dangerously mad as well. I genuinely believe she's > a hateful racist How have you come to that belief?

fishbiscuits Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Meanwhile.. Labour voters and Corbyn fanclub > members up and down the country, desperately > trying to convince themselves and others that a > vote for Labour is a vote against Brexit. Utterly > delusional!! surely it's a vote for a vote on Brexit which to me is the right answer - a referendum on the issue in isolation rather than with the surrounding chaos of the GE, as was the case first time around but with the benefit of more information and (hopefully) a binary outcome that can be delivered rather than delusional 'brexit means brexit' BS

Spartacus Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The issue I see with Nicole is not them voting for > independence, personally I don't give a Jot if > they do you're not a fan of this United Kingdom? and you think breaking up will be easy?

keano77 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Possibly pk but don?t forget the krankies brought > their independence referendum two years before the > Brexit ref, not as a result of it And before Brexit they voted to stay in the Union Post Brexit probably not

keano77 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sounds simple Alan. However we?ve seen the > difficulties in disentangling ourselves from 40 > years of EU membership. How much more difficult to > unravel 400 years of Union? > > What belongs to the Crown? Defence and coastal > waters? An economic border between England and > Scotland if we?re not in the EU? Tariffs for > cross-border trade? > > I don?t think this has been thought through I agree the leavers didn?t think this thru, the end of the Union is a very likely consequence of Brexit And that?ll create another hell of a mess

Blah Blah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The best that is expected is a coalition, that can > get us to a 2nd referendum on Brexit, before > another GE. So what Corbyn can actually do in > government is going to be very limited. > > I agree that this is the best that can be expected and would be a good outcome - deal with Brexit in isolation via a ref and then come back to elect a new government once that decision's been made (on a binary remain or specific deal basis, not a 'leave means leave' mantra)

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > > One of those things that may grow on people before > they get sick of the site of it. > > I don't know, I think that the site's ok

Captain Marvel Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I can't (paywall) see that but I guess it's the > Indy usual > > PK, since you obviously have a clue, please > enlighten me If you think ?enlightenment? comes off a few words of a local forum, I guess it just shows how clueless you are I suspect you know what you?ve written is not based on reality, but you think it?s funny or clever To start, you could ask yourself whether you know anything about how the US will save the day (but not the environment) or whether no one does (because in fact no one does) and in fact they won?t

Captain Marvel Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Does anyone seriously think that the Cons want to > 'sell' the NHS or make health care unaffordable? > > Everyone is aware - even the flint hearted Tories > - that the NHS is as close to a religion as we get > in this septic isle and to attempt to do anything > with it but tinker at the edges would bring a > 2,000 tonne shithammer down on their heads > > The fact that the NHS needs a major overhaul is > something none of them can address because to do > so would be to invite street riots. > > Have no fear ye wee trembling, superstitious folk, > you won't be getting your wounds bandaged whilst > being force fed chlorinated chicken at a $1,000 > dollars a second any time soon you haven't got a clue what you're talking about