pk

Loutwo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > pk Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Loutwo Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Nothing weird about that. > > > Louisa. > > > > and yet you make some sort of weird issue about > > it > > > > whilst ignoring the fact that tbe wetherspoons > > that you crave so strongly have decided that > your > > despised pizza is the future > > > > it really is rather pathetic (particularly the > > inconsistencies) > > I?ll tell you what?s even more pathetic. You > finding the time to question someone else?s > motives behind their dislike of pizza and opinions > on chips and condiments. And you call me pathetic? > I rest my case. > > Louisa. very clever (not)

Loutwo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Nothing weird about that. > Louisa. and yet you make some sort of weird issue about it whilst ignoring the fact that tbe wetherspoons that you crave so strongly have decided that your despised pizza is the future it really is rather pathetic (particularly the inconsistencies)

Loutwo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Seabag I?ve had enough of this. There?s nothing > wrong with people eating what they like. You know > me, I?m not one to judge when it comes to people > making decisions about food. However, there are > limits. How anyone could be poncy enough to mix a > pub classic like lasagne with oven chips I will > never know. Never heard of the like. > > Louisa. Perhaps you?re too distracted by the multitude of pizzas of different sizes to notice that chips is offered as an add on to lasagne at your beloved Wetherspoons Or perhaps you?ve just got this weird thing about saying ridiculous things to be provocative in a weirdly inconsistent manner

Loutwo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Who on earth East chips with lasagne? Surely a > nice salad and garlic bread is the only route? > Bizarre choice. > > Louisa. It?s very common in old school greasy spoon type cafs, I thought you liked those traditional, low cost, working class places and the people that eat in them?

http://www.miguelsboxinggym.co.uk/training-options/kids-boxing-london/ good classes on a Tues and Thurs, pay as you go

Hemingway Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > 'one reason only' - we had a WA on the table. MPs > across the board rejected it, hence we face no > deal. Obvs there?s not one reason only

Hemingway Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Just a wry smile at those moaning > about the calamitous effects of a 'no deal' when > their rejection of May's deal is why we are where > we are. no it's not

Hemingway Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Makes me laugh all this wailing now a all those > MPs, Labour, LDs, Green (1) who voted against > May's WA are complicit if we get No Deal. We > should have taken the deal then, is about good as > we'll get. it's weird what some people find funny

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > Yes.. and the E.U. tells us what we can spend it > on. > > Why not keep all the money we send to the E.U. and > spend all of it on things we need to spend it on. > > Like The NHS, Policing, Schools, restoring TV > licences for the over 75's > > DF why not actually invest a little time researching some facts and getting an understanding of the issues rather than spouting rubbish based on ignorance, that you can't even be consistent with?

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > We have seen the collapse of many Empires > including the British Empire when we once ruled > most of the World. > > The E.U. is just the latest Empire which itself > will soon break up and expire. > > It is amazing that the UK sends Money to the E.U. > in Brussells > Why are they not sending money to us. London. Why > are we NOT in charge. ?? > > Most scams start with a 30day free trial. > You know the ones where the small print does not > allow you to leave without paying to do so. > They just keep taking money out of your account. > You have very little control over it. > > So lets not worry too much about a No Deal > Brexit. Leave and get on with it. Scarily ignorant! Zero understanding of what makes an empire or an union And yet so ready to spout nonsense

To be clear, it?s those suggesting that kids always notice what they?ve lost within less than 30 mins that I think are clueless And those making up what the parent thought, when they haven?t any idea (But, as I said earlier, don?t see the need to go on here about someone being mean spirited, there?s too much of that on here already)

cella Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > In what way is he? He is not part of the > Government. But sadly he?s not providing a credible alternative So agree he?s part of the problem and was pre-referendum too I?m not sure even he knows what he thinks most of the time One thing that the country needs is a new leader of the opposition

NewWave Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm on the side of the shopkeeper, he gave you > 30mins which assuming you are local seems ample > time for A;your son to realise he didn't have it > and B; you to get back. > My suspicion is that your son realised it had gone > missing sooner (it seems unusual for a small child > not to miss a much loved toy quite soon after > losing it-that is one who is old enough to ride a > scooter and verbalise things) > And you having other things to do said "don't > worry darling-the man will keep it We'll go back > later" and then you 'finally' got round to > returning on Friday or saturday a day or two later > on the assumption it would be held safe. > When he didn't do that your guilt at your > complacent attitude lead to you penning this > unjustified rant naming and shaming said store. > Just a thought... Clueless

Penguin68 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You have to consider the circulation space around > an obstruction to calculate the effective area > taken up by a scooter. Particularly if lying prone > on the ground in an aisle. Or you move the obstruction? Fitting a scooter around things like boxes of crisps or crates of drinks is as actually remarkably easy There are alternatives to leaving it prone on the ground in the aisle, but maybe that too is unreasonable

Penguin68 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > A scooter takes up at least a couple of square feet, effectively, more > if it is lying on the ground. Guess you missed the lessons at school when they taught others how to calculate area

Penguin68 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The decent thing to do would be to put it behind > the counter. Why could the shop owner not do that? > > > IT WAS A SCOOTER! Yeah a child?s scooter, which in my experience is often very precious to a child Yes it was a mistake that it was left behind, but things get forgotten sometimes I think that giving it a day or two would?ve been reasonable and kind Giving it 30 min is very likely to get end up with an upset child, so seems a bit mean That said, I don?t really see the need to post about it on here, people are a bit mean a lot of the time

Hemingway Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Most of those could be applied to many > politicians. What other prime ministers or presidents are you thinking of? > > Who said I was OK with any of them? I didn't. I > don't support Johnson. > > It's just to say Johnson is the British Trump is > left wing knicker wetting of the highest > degree.....huge swathes of left wing twitter now > think we now have a fascist government... it's > adolescent, fantasy stuff. That?s a lot of exaggeration for someone accusing others of getting over excited!

Hemingway Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Left wing social media taking up everything Trump > says as truth now then? Just cos trump says it, doesn?t mean it?s not true There are definite similarities Fabrication of ?facts? to prove points Denial of their past statements even in the face of evidence Scaremongering over immigration Promises to make their countries the best in the world ever (or words to that effect) Making promises they can?t deliver Putting their individual profiles ahead of everything else You ok with all that?

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > you have NO first hand experience of And what is it that you?ve got this unique first hand experience of that means that you see the truth that others don?t?

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > watch this if you dare.......and it is > all true. > > I dared to watch a few minutes It?s not all true, it?s not even consistent!

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > After the authorities closed ranks and protected > the vile Jimmy Saville then ALL the public > 'protectors' should be following up abuse > especially after this little gem > https://www.politicalite.com/corbyn/labour/labours > -cover-up-gordon-browns-government-urged-police-no > t-to-investigate-muslim-grooming-gangs/ you really don't know what you're talking about

Humdinger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If i were the old bill, id likely stop any > teenagers hanging around and in possession of any > bike hire scheme bicycles. They are clearly not > going for a leisurely cycle with them, or going > to/from work, so they have already stolen the > bicycle. Then see whats in their grubby little > pockets. what a prat

DuncanW Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Why is it that the news media always call him > Tommy Robinson, but then without fail state that > his real name is SYL within a couple of lines? > > There are plenty of other people in public life > who operate under an assumed name that they don?t > do this for: Perhaps because those others aren?t in court, where people are identified by their real names?

mikeb Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The choice is between it remaining derelict and / > or not fit for purpose, or being demolished and > replaced with new public buildings - the school > and health centre. sounds about right

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > I think pubs and restaurants have different > Licencing rules. > > Remember when people used to go for a Curry after > the Pub shut to get another drink. ? > Might not be so significant in our Big Towns and > cities but could be significant in more rural > areas. > > There needs to be clarification as to whether any > establishment is a Pub or a Restaurant. > There needs to be consistency. > > DulwichFox Why is consistency important? Surely having pub and restaurant licensing being somewhat flexible to take into account eg local opinion and environment is good - not all pubs should necessarily operate the same opening hours for example, I?d suggest In the current circumstances, I?d also suggest that no time should be sent trying to fix something that isn?t a problem