pk

Asset Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > OK, don't forget about posters and leaflets in all > the local nurseries and children's play areas, > parent fora etc etc. so the parents can prepare > and make sure their children aren't disturbed. > > How far radius should be covered? I suggest 2 > miles from the display, also I think prevailing > winds should be taken into account and perhaps the > range of leafleting should be extended by a mile > or two in that direction. > > Maybe some full page adverts in the local press > too. Or a few posters strategically placed and the dog owner network spreads the word? Like what?s been suggested

In practice any coverage would be limited, but I agree that a few posters in the immediate area isn?t much to ask, particularly if they cover local dog walking places Then maybe dog owners could flag forthcoming displays in their areas on a dog owners forum Then people with dogs that are badly affected by fireworks could check for displays local to them from time to time and makes plans accordingly

first mate Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Have a read around the impact of fireworks on pet > animals ( veterinary research etc..) and if you > still feel the same I would be surprised. So how do you (realistically) think notice should work? Blanket leaflet drops, as has been suggested?

first mate Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Seriously?! Obviously not It?s ridiculous, like most of this thread

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > pk Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > DulwichFox Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > ?Rye Lane is a No-Go zone? > > > > ?would not dream of walking around that area on > my > > own at night? > > > > ?Its a Shite Hole. the place is derelict? > > > > ?I do not see the point of going to Peckham if > you > > live in East Dulwich? > > > > all DF 2019 > > > > DF - if you want people to take you seriously > ever > > you should probably stop contradicting yourself > so > > much > > All partial extracts of replies to several threads > on different subjects taken out of context. > > Fox. All from the same thread (I know you?re not big on facts, but that?s a fact) Guess they?re therefore on the same subject And in any context the meaning is clear But for context, this is from the thread where you were said ?what do you expect[?]? in relation to an attempted mugging on rye lane (the quotes were in the 2nd and 7th posts) Guess that means I win

first mate Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Indeed, that's all that is being asked; no bans, > no removal of freedoms, just a bit of notice. > Sorry this seems to be such an impossible task for > some. Perhaps the same could apply to people taking dogs out in public so that people who are scared of dogs could know to avoid, guess it?d have to be restricted to specific hours otherwise people might find it difficult to avoid dogs

imasnookercue Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Isnt Voodoo Ray's ?4 for a SLICE of pizza? > Ludicrous! (dont care how big they are btw) How is size not relevant to price?

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You seem to have an obsession with Peckham where I > was born, went to school and lived in for 28 > years > > I'm still out and about walking/shopping in > Peckham several times a week. I use lots of shops > on Rye Lane. > > I often use Manzes Pie and Mash .. I believe they > do not take cards. > > Fox ?Rye Lane is a No-Go zone? ?would not dream of walking around that area on my own at night? ?Its a Shite Hole. the place is derelict? ?I do not see the point of going to Peckham if you live in East Dulwich? all DF 2019 DF - if you want people to take you seriously ever you should probably stop contradicting yourself so much

Metallic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > There is no reason why an organisation, club or school > can't make an effort to tell people in advance. > All it takes is a few quid to leaflet or post > leaflets up in a diameter of a mile. it wouldn't be good for the environment tho would it? all that unnecessary paper

Angelina Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Fireworks are actually really frightening for dogs > and can make them behave in unpredictable ways, > which can be unsafe and dangerous for them. > > Owners need to be able to prepare and plan and be > there when they start - which is usually at > expected times. > > It's thoughtless in a community to not care about > other people and the effects this has on them. > > No one is being boring - just practical and > concerned. so if we're running stupid arguments - lots of children are scared of dogs, so shouldn't dog owners care about those terrified and traumatised children and not have dogs that they take out in public? or are the rights of dogs more important than those of children? or is this all really a bit ridiculous?

Zaardvark Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Afraid so. Going cashless is the future (i.e. > visit Stockholm) and all smartphones have the > capability to be used like cards also. If they > were burgled/robbed then you have to understand. I > am surprised to read the negativity in the > comments and "I seldom carry credit cards at all > and NEVER at night." is true to form for > DulwichFox (i.e is not true and is to provoke). but isn't DF's main point that businesses should consider his tracksuit bottoms when deciding how to take payment??

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Dig deep people > https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/extinction- > rebellion-chaos-cost-police-7-million-says-scotlan > d-yard-chief-cressida-dick-a4133076.html > > and that was in May....these people are just > anarchists and various old farts having a last > hurrah... you don't believe in climate change then? like the Donald

Humdinger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Its a pity no one jumped on, dragged to the ground > and kicked the piece of scum doing the mugging. > you've got some weird attraction to violence you might want to seek some help for it

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > pk Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > We have QC and QA companies operating in the UK > and they are strictly controlled by the FDA as > well as European monitoring But we?ve voted against European ?monitoring? surely, so that won?t do Isn?t this all about not liking their rules and not wanting to comply with them and a desire to set own great British rules that are the best and that don?t allow free movement of goods

keano77 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > > I do have a problem with medicines being > delayed because of form filling. It would be > unnecessary as we have been importing these > medicines from the same reputable sources for the > last 40-odd years. > > I don?t believe the EU would allow such a > situation. But that wouldn?t respect the referendum, where people voted against free movement of goods It?d be an insult to democracy surely?

Whilst on the subject of medicine, we should remember that the European regulatory HQ recently left London taking hundreds of jobs with it, as a direct result of brexit And leaving the uk without effective law regulating medicine here (unless we just stick with the eu regime, which presumably isn?t what leavers want) This is our problem not theirs

keano77 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ?...This is a consequence of brexit not a cause? > > True pk. There will be many consequences. > > But I cannot see administrative intransigence > leading to the 21st century equivalent of people > leading horse- and donkey-drawn carts through the > streets of Britain shouting > > ?Bring out your dead - the EU is holding up our > medicines because we haven?t filled out the forms > properly? > > But then again I could be wrong. We?ve all met > jobsworths who stick to the rules I don?t think you?ve any concept of the unavoidable complexity of exiting the EU Whilst the intention may be good, you seem to massively oversimplify things Not least when suggesting that rules (as in laws) are optional and for jobsworths

keano77 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Correct me if I?m wrong, but as I understand it > the worry over the supply of medicines is they?ll > be caught up in bureaucratic customs processes - > UK companies dealing with customs declarations > and/or the need to change IT systems to comply > with customs processes and border requirements for > both import and export. > > If this is correct all the EU has to do is > guarantee priority clearance and dispense with > form filling and box ticking in the case of > essential medicines. > > The EU is not our enemy and is not employing some > medieval siege tactic to unleash pestilence and > starve the UK into submission. However it?s time > the EU got a grip and realised there?s a limit to > pen pushers colouring paragraphs red, amber and > green. > > I realise such a guarantee would weaken its > negotiating clout but such a guarantee could be > released in the next 10 minutes if there was good > will. In case you missed it, it was the UK that wants out of free movement of goods, not the EU This is a consequence of brexit not a cause

keano77 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > As I say, there are some points you make that I > agree with and many of our problems, or > shortcomings, have nothing to do with the EU and > stretch back to the Thatcher government but led to > the Leave result nevertheless. > > However, this whole Brexit issue has been good for > this country. It has exposed how over 40-odd years > we have sleep-walked into a bureaucratic and > logistical spider?s web. > > We have lost our own manufacturing base as > businesses profited from out-sourcing and just in > time supply chains. We are dependent on other > countries for medicines which the EU is now using > as project fear blackmail. Expand our > pharmaceutical industries. > > To use one of your examples Burbage, there is no > reason why Cornwall couldn?t can its own pilchards > so much needed jobs could be created. It would > cost far less than one month of our contributions > to the EU to set up and we get the income tax and > our shopkeepers benefit from workers? spending > power. > > Whether Britain seizes the opportunity of Brexit > or not is of course another question Clueless

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Again Burbage- you have NO idea what has gone on > in the rest of the country since Blair invited the > poorest of the EU to come and live in the poorest > areas of the UK....typical ED ivory tower > verbosity- you're lucky you've got the time! at least you're honest enough to admit that most leavers voted based on immigration

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > stepdown Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > uncleglen Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Paula Sheriff opened the door- deliberately I > > > expect- engineered to get a response that > > > remainiacs can latch on to....and they > did.... > > > > I was going to accuse you of arguing against a > > straw man, attacking a position or motive you > have > > imagined rather than one anybody has actually > > taken. On reflection though it's unfair to even > > hold your post to that low standard, you're > just > > regurgitating talking points. > > > > The debate was around civility in political > > discourse, but I suppose that would be of > little > > interest to somebody whose 3 most recent posts > in > > this thread refer to "remainiacs", > "undemocratic > > bloody farce" and "treachery". > > Since day 1 of the referendum (which was won by > the Leave camp btw) the Leave voters have been > subjected to vile insults from the 'others'- > racist, xenophobic, thickies etc etc BUT as soon > as some strong - and NOT abusive language is used > by a Brexiteer you hypocrites are once again > jumping up and down....'there's none so blind as > those that will not see' what a load of BS

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Paula Sheriff opened the door- deliberately I > expect- engineered to get a response that > remainiacs can latch on to....and they did.... Surely Johnson opened the door by being hugely disrespectful And she just called him out In response to which he was hugely disrespectful

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > But but, it had nothing to do with Brexit.... > > /forum/file.php? > 20,file=337812 shameless ignorance and/or misinformation!

Should say ?your? not ?or? above, apologies

Humdinger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > That Everton fan was hardly a bystander wrapped in > club colours going along to the game to cheer on > his team and maybe have a cup of tea at half > time. > > He was part of a large gang of hardcore football > hooligans from Merseyside who had arranged to meet > their Millwall counterparts and kick the living > crap out of each other around the residential > streets of Surrey Quays. He got his face slashed > while doing so. > > So perhaps some perspective, idiot? my perspective is that isn't funny or perspective is that it is how does that make me an idiot?