pk

Chick Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > He's just a troll. I?m not sure that making light of young people being stabbed is ever ?just? trolling Anyone that makes those comments seriously or who makes them as a bit of fun is an idiot to me and should be called out as such

Penguin68 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hopefully the air ambulance wasnt diverted from an > actual accident where a decent hard working person > needed help, whilst these kids played lets pretend > to be a gangster and stab each other on our front > doorstep. > > Unless you know a great deal more about this > incident than you are revealing, the culpability > of the victims of these knife crimes towards their > own injuries is mere conjecture on your part. As > would be the level of personal responsibility for > anyone involved in an accident and needing the air > ambulance. As would be the 'merit' - in terms of > being hard working, of these victims. The > existence of county lines exploiting children > suggests that children are not 'playing' at being > gangsters but are (sometimes) deeply involved, not > necessarily voluntarily, in 'gang' criminality. I think that he?s intending to be stupidly provocative and prejudiced Which makes him an idiot in my book

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Now the puppet Swede is telling people to break > the law- should be arrested forthwith > https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10154011/extinction- > rebellion-greta-thunberg-break-law/ but when your brother in bullsh*t Brendon encourages rioting he's a voice of reason you are a massive hypocrite

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > Within 3 years of us joining the EEC 2 of my own > family lost their dairy farms in Wiltshire because > of cheap imports. > WE the REAL people have been royally shat upon by > the EU good working class REAL owners of huge amounts of land yeah? you reckon that those people at canning town were disenfranchised landowning farmers too?

Ridgley Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ridgley Wrote: > ------------------------------------------------- > ------ > > I already voted in 2016 > > BrandNewGuy > > and did you vote for the deal announced today? > > I have not heard the news as yet PK ok, so what did you think leave meant when you voted leave? what were you thoughts in 2016 on the backstop?

Ridgley Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I already voted in 2016 > BrandNewGuy and did you vote for the deal announced today?

to be fair to 'you' you 'wasn't' asked a question with a proper answer in 2016 - leave doesn't mean leave as we can now clearly see so unless you're saying in 2016 52% voted for the deal that Boris proposes today (they couldn't have) or that 52% really didn't care about any details (which seems clearly to be nonsense) then asking 'is this what you want?' is the only logical step to stick to a 'brexit means brexit' mantra just makes people look stupid

malumbu Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Can the 52% tell me what they voted for They didn?t vote for anything, they voted against something which is why it?s impossible to deliver So totally agree, need to ask the people whether they want this deal or not

Hemingway Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > er, we are moving towards renewables already and > pretty quickly. We have some of the most > challenging emission targets in the world. it's > just the old anti-capitalist rent-a- mob ravers > combined with naive school kids and their virtual > signalling parents. Outrage from the privileged, > searching for some sense of victim hood. yawn

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > stepdown Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Suggesting you segregate on the basis of > religion > > or send people away from their homes based on > it > > is beneath any acceptable standard of debate. > > > > You've shown your true colours, I won't be > > engaging with your posts again. > The stats speak for themselves > https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2018/02/21/in-north > ern-ireland-there-is-a-strong-division-in-how-diff > erent-ethno-national-groups-voted-in-the-referendu > m/ And your trusted source says that the trend since the referendum is pro-Remain such that less than 75% of leave voters would vote that way again And that more educated people in all groups voted remain But more generally your ideas about segregation based on religion are shameful

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > tallulah71 Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Agree with Frankito: DF-baiting is boring and > off-topic > > Where am I baiting. ?? I am merely stating how I > prefer do my shopping/buying. > I prefer cash . I find it easier to keep track of > my spending. > > The Topic of this thread is 'Cafe in Peckham Rye > goes cashless' > Talking about not liking that idea and not liking > being forced into carrying and using cards is Way > ON topic. > > Fox. I think they?re defending you against evil me

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > pk Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > uncleglen Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Now Merkel is trying to stir up trouble by > > saying that NI should > > > stay in the EU customs union....sneaky or > what? > > > > > > > > > its what the people of NI wanted voted for in > the > > referendum > > ONLY 790,000 people in NI voted in the referendum, > 38% of them couldn't be bothered to get off their > bums. So what you?re saying is that only about a quarter could be bothered to vote to leave, presumably because the rest didn?t want to or didn?t want to enough to do anything about it

Siduhe Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Put yourself in the position of a parent who doesn't have any spare > cash, and for whom a once a week treat for their > kids at the park cafe is the single luxury they > allow themselves to keep within budget - there are > plenty of people for whom this is a day to day > reality. You?ve got no idea whether people choose their single luxury to be a treat in the cafe at the park, seems unlikely to me I think that suggesting that a cafe going cashless is socially exclusive is much less valid than the suggestion that a cafe that charges so much is exclusive If the aim is to ensure accessibility, surely price should be the top issue?

It doesn?t matter at all But it?s a discussion forum and it?s a topic on which you seem to have a lot to say So I think it?s a fair question and I answered your question, it?d be rude not to

But what do you think should happen?

I?ve probably missed it elsewhere, but Keano - what do you think should happen now?

keano77 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Treat it as an allegory pk i'll treat it as pointless rubbish, thanks

keano77 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You are worried about rubbish? > > Tell me one thing that has been achieved since the > Remainers won the Supreme Court case and > Parliament was re-convened. > > One thing please pk parliament has had a (limited) opportunity to ask questions on brexit planning and yellowhammer and the country had an opportunity to hear the same tell me one thing that makes talk about pigeons anything other than rubbish

keano77 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ?Only, it isn't. Even if we accept "the purpose" > of the act is as you say, nothing you raised > impacts his ability to comply with the law.? > > What if Boris wrote the letter and attached it to > a carrier pigeon that regrettably didn?t make it > out of England due to confusion during a pheasant > shoot? What?s the point of writing this rubbish?

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Now Merkel is trying to stir up trouble by saying that NI should > stay in the EU customs union....sneaky or what? > its what the people of NI wanted voted for in the referendum

keano77 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > > You U.K. can?t leave the EU because we can stop > you. except that they cant stop us and she's not saying they can

Metallic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I did suggest the e newsletters and posters on the > many noticeboards around.... of course I don't > tolerate the waste of resources or time. but you did suggest leafleting a mile's diameter too

Metallic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > pk Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > first mate Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Indeed, that's all that is being asked; no > > bans, > > > no removal of freedoms, just a bit of notice. > > > Sorry this seems to be such an impossible > task > > for > > > some. > > > > > > Perhaps the same could apply to people taking > dogs > > out in public so that people who are scared of > > dogs could know to avoid, guess it?d have to be > > restricted to specific hours otherwise people > > might find it difficult to avoid dogs > > You are quite ridiculous mate. as I've made clear above, I was joking were you joking about blanket leafleting and the distribution of unwanted paper? imagine the cost to the environment of loads of people receiving loads of leaflets about things that they have no interest in

Frankito Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > > Now can we get back to discussing the topic in > question I?ve never understood why people say stuff like this and then don?t say anything about the topic? Having said nothing so far on it

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I have agreed with Admin not to further comment on > aspects of safety in the area here on EDF. > I.E. Not to over emphasise the situation. > So did you admit you got it wrong in the past?