Muley Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It's a small distinction, and of no comfort to the > Afrikaans, but didn't the British action against > the Boers ultimately have a military purpous > rather than being motivated by concepts of racial > purity/inferiority? Sorry, I?ve just read this. Not entirely correct, no it wasn?t about racial purity but it was an attack on and attempt to eradicate a cultural identity rather than a purely military exercise. Yes the genocide* was intended to break the guerilla war. That was the excuse Kitchener used in order to have his plans implemented. The other reason was to depopulate the Transvaal and parts of the Free State and eradicate the Transvaal Boers as simply beating them in war and governing them had proved impossible. They sat on top of and had political sway over the world?s largest supply of gold. They were in the way of the mining magnates. Thankfully, due to opposition very much from some of the British themselves, Kitchener didn?t succeed in killing off the entire nation. The English did however move in and take over the economy and the Boers were left impoverished, landless, disenfranchised and economically discriminated against. (Which in turn led to the rise of Afrikaner Nationalism and all the bullshit that brought with it. But that?s another, often ignoble, story) That?s just a very brief overview. Sorry I could have left it alone but for some reason I feel compelled to set the record straight. For what little it?s worth. Back to how smoking is good for all of us. * and it was genocide even though it didn?t succeed and the army still deny it. We can get into that separately but (mockney) assume that I know what the term means and that I wouldn?t use it incorrectly.