Responsibility for not brining the office you hold and/or your profession into disrepute is completely different to the civil punishment you receive for breaking the law. EDIT: To remove unnecessarily abrasive comment.
Still the point holds true that if America hadn?t intervened Europe would very likely have ended up property of Soviet Russia rather than Nazi Germany.
We only want threads on well-heeled, respectable tits, arses and front bottoms that will add to the already high-brow nature of this esteemed organ. p.p. Moos.
I?ve always thought/suspected that the American?s were going to get involved in the war at some stage anyway in order to secure an allied (to them) power base in Europe but Pearl Harbour just forced their hand a little earlier. I also don?t think they were in a position to get involved in the earlier stages of the war.
What is telling about this is that the BBC article was first entitled ?No. 10 Frantic about Brown Snub? or something like that. Then it mysteriously changed to ?No 10 denies Obama snub to Brown?
SeanMacGabhann Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Did she deliberately break the law or was it a > technical oversight? > > Putting a process in place to vet every single > employee for immigration status is one thing - but > the country would grind to a halt if those checks > were run every single time. Well if we go down that line of argument perhaps she should be fired for wasting public time and funds by putting unworkable legislation in place.
Meet me! Meet me! I?m important. http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/markmardell/2009/09/not_so_special.html But we speak the same language. We?re very, very important don?t you know. France? Germany? Where are theses places, in Spain somewhere?
I seem to have lost my muse and can only communicate effectively thought the medium of imbedded images at the moment. http://cakedelivery.com.au/images/lemon%20meringue.jpg