I just read this from the New Scientist. The mind boggles it truly does. ??IN A more rational parallel universe, the debate about healthcare in the US could have focused on quality-adjusted life years and the extent to which it is helpful for insurers to cover heroic, almost invariably futile - and immensely profitable - attempts to extend life. Instead, we got what students of the rhetoric surrounding science might appreciate as a startling case study: the transformation of the UK's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) into "The Death Panel" - because it entertains just such a discussion. Feedback was most puzzled, though, by the now-notorious intervention of Investor's Business Daily, which concluded that "scientist Stephen Hawking wouldn't have a chance in the UK, where the National Health Service would say the life of this brilliant man... is essentially worthless". How did they work that one out? Could it be, we first wondered, that they had read Hawking's book A Brief History of Time to the end? The book's argument hinges on the notion of imaginary time - normal time (we paraphrase) multiplied by the square root of -1. David Jeffery came across a publication entitled Emigrating Abroad in the bookseller W. H. Smith. He wants to know whether there is a sister book for people who emigrate somewhere else And the NHS is beset by time: government targets for waiting time, treatment time, appointment time... You can see how its administration could go into angry meltdown when confronted by Hawkins's notion. But it seems not. In Washington DC to receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom, Hawking said - through his famous voice synthesiser - that "I wouldn't be here today if it were not for the NHS". How did the IBD website respond? Wading past its plugs for courses in special methods for trading stocks and shares, we find that the notorious quote is missing, replaced with: "This version corrects the original editorial which implied that physicist Stephen Hawking, a professor at the University of Cambridge, did not live in the UK." Clearly technology is to blame. They had assumed Hawking was a US citizen, safe from the horrors of socialised medicine. The whole hoo-ha arose, we confidently surmise, because of his voice synthesiser's accent.?