Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 9 vs 1? Hmmm. ANother example of emergency service

> overkill.



You wouldn't say that if it was YOUR home being burgled. Reckon you could contain a burglar single handedly?


Cretin.

It's your money that's going to waste and I really would prefer the ever-slimmer resources to be used more realistically.

Three police officers walking together chatting to each other (and not therefore necessarily taking note of what's going on around them) is reasonably common to see.

Why would anyone - including a cretin - think that it is good to have such a waste of resources? Why would stop at nine? Go the whole hog and send twenty!

Again - it's your money that's being used poorly so when your car is broken into or your wallet is pickpocketed and the police tell you they can't justify coming out to you, you (plural, not anyone in particular) may think differently.

But was it actually to catch a burglar? Do we know?


And if it was, and if they caught him, why was that overkill? We have no idea if it was overkill unless we know the exact situation.


The police are damned if they do and damned if they don't. Usually threads on here are complaining that burglars aren't being caught!

I can confirm that at approximately noon today there were several marked police cars and vans, unmarked cars, two officers in uniform (possibly community support officers) and, I believe, a plain clothes officer who appeared to be the lead and using a radio in pursuit of an individual (or individuals?). They were frantically searching the area and roads between Court Lane and Woodwarde Road around Dovercourt/Druce and adjacent roads. Given they were up and down the roads more than once, the impression was that they didn't know the precise location of their target but that they believed him (or her or them) to be in this area and likely using the gardens to hide and evade the search. It appears as though at least one person was apprehended hiding in the garden of a house on Court Lane near to Court Lane Gardens and Druce Road.


I don't know if this was their only target and/or person to be apprehended. Similarly, I have no idea if this was burglary related. There was however a very material Police presence which was more than the "local Bobby on the beat" as indicated by the plain clothes officer and unmarked cars. I am not familiar with the Police rules for responding to reported "routine" residential burglaries - perhaps this is standard, a current area of focus or the matter was considered by the police to be of greater significance thereby warranting the level of resource?


Perhaps someone else either saw the chase commence and/or is familiar with Police guidelines to respond in such a manner

There's another thread in just the last couple of days about would-be burglars nearby, and not long ago the police did house visits to warn people that it's a hotspot (apparently the area in the UK with the highest number of insurance claims for burglary per capita) and to up their security, so maybe they've increased their presence. Or maybe it just happened to be a quiet morning and they all responded to a general alert. Who knows? The ones who weren't needed pushed off pretty quickly.


Deeply unfashionable as it may be to say so around here, I think the police did a great job. A bit more of that might turn things around. Still got a warm fuzzy feeling about it and a general sense of being a bit safer.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Deeply unfashionable as it may be to say so around

> here, I think the police did a great job. A bit

> more of that might turn things around. Still got a

> warm fuzzy feeling about it and a general sense of

> being a bit safer.



Good to hear.

A few years ago we were broken into whilst my hubby was in the house and he came face to face with burglar who appeared very drunk. Hubby was about to ring Police when he remembered that there was a police car outside our house.

He informed officers that he had a very drunk burglar in his house - several police officers and a dog charged in the house and arrested the guy.

It would appear that this guy had broken into houses down the road and was spotted by builders, he made his way via various gardens until he got to us when he proceed to break a heavy wooden door, then some French windows to gain entry to us. Various householders reported that a man was climbing their garden fences and called police.


It sounds that this may have happened in this incident

Leviathan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apparently it was a mugger



Hope they got the bastard, then.


Somebody I know who walks with a stick and has other disabilities, some quite visible, was mugged on Friday night - by a woman.


The police were brilliant and sent somebody round very quickly, but I doubt could have caught her.


I couldn't believe anybody would stoop so low. Good on the police for taking action where they can.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's your money that's going to waste and I really

> would prefer the ever-slimmer resources to be used

> more realistically.

> Three police officers walking together chatting to

> each other (and not therefore necessarily taking

> note of what's going on around them) is reasonably

> common to see.

> Why would anyone - including a cretin - think that

> it is good to have such a waste of resources? Why

> would stop at nine? Go the whole hog and send

> twenty!

> Again - it's your money that's being used poorly

> so when your car is broken into or your wallet is

> pickpocketed and the police tell you they can't

> justify coming out to you, you (plural, not anyone

> in particular) may think differently.


So, how many officers would you expect it to take to contain a suspect in a potential 'live' crime scene? With numerous escape routes including the park.


I'm sure that like most keyboard warriors you could have wrestled them to the ground single handedly. I suspect that the reality would be that you'd run off and then complain about the lack of Police assistance.


And for the record, the average burglar is a career criminal with no qualms about doing whatever it takes to evade capture. So going mob handed is the sensible thing to do if there is a chance of capturing them in the act. The last time a burglar was caught locally and banged up, the rate of burglaries dropped through the floor overnight as they tend to be so prolific.


Police bashing seems to be a theme of yours, if memory serves. Buy the Guardian much..?

ED - NAGAIUTB Wrote in response to Nigello:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> So, how many officers would you expect it to take

> to contain a suspect in a potential 'live' crime

> scene? With numerous escape routes including the

> park.

>

> I'm sure that like most keyboard warriors you

> could have wrestled them to the ground single

> handedly. I suspect that the reality would be that

> you'd run off and then complain about the lack of

> Police assistance.

>

> And for the record, the average burglar is a

> career criminal with no qualms about doing

> whatever it takes to evade capture. So going mob

> handed is the sensible thing to do if there is a

> chance of capturing them in the act. The last time

> a burglar was caught locally and banged up, the

> rate of burglaries dropped through the floor

> overnight as they tend to be so prolific.

>

> Police bashing seems to be a theme of yours, if

> memory serves. Buy the Guardian much..?


Well said!

Yeah it might sound like overkill on the face of it, but bear in mind

a) There might be several possible escape routes, through gardens, park, etc

b) If you had to apprehend a violent criminal, I'm sure you'd appreciate a bit of backup too

c) They clearly needed to catch the scumbag

Quite. The chances of catching a scumbag who is hiding in gardens and moving from one to another with several different escape routes is not very great with only a couple of plod available. Better swarm the place for a few minutes and have a decent chance of catching the offender, surely?

With the exception of his/her rather uncalled for comment about Grauniad readers (of which I am proudly one), I agree with what ED - NAGAIUTB has said. The police are by no means perfect but in this kind of case they are damned if they do and damned if they don't. I fully support their actions in Court Lane.


No doubt if masses of police had turned up at an incident at, say, the Elephant, some of the contributors to this thread would complain that the north of the borough was getting preferential treatment at the expense of the poor folk of Dulwich.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...