Jump to content

Recommended Posts

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah, that was my guess. That's really the only

> unit large enough. It may just be a pop up

> similar to with Brissi did. It seems to be that

> Landlords business model.




With 18 Stores in London... 14 more in the UK... and 8 in the US... Can't see it being a Pop-up... ??


DulwichFox

Yes, I thought that too Jeremy. Perhaps these are the deep pockets they've been after!


I didn't realise they had that many outlets DF. I agree its less likely they'll be a pop up, though businesses like Brissi with a few outlets have done pop ups in the old ED Deli site.


Let's see how they get on. I think they'll probably make a killing.

Pop-ups tend either to be seasonal (so Christmas special products, or products in an area which might buy during a specific season but where 365 day trading couldn't be sustained) or be used as try-outs for specific business models (or shop lay-outs). Neither of these feel like a credible strategic option in this case. However a pop-up can also be used to determine general demand in an area, without too much outlay for leases etc. This is possibly the case here. [Pop-ups are also used to shift product bought-in i.e. in a fire sale etc., but obviously not the case here].

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> However a pop-up

> can also be used to determine general demand in an

> area, without too much outlay for leases etc. This

> is possibly the case here.


The vacancy is advertised as permanent though...

I can't believe people pay almost ?100 for leggings which they get red and sweaty in ....😩http://www.sweatybetty.com/mobile/clothing/all-bottoms/

I'll stick to an old baggy t shirt and 3 for ?10 leggings from Sainsbury's .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone have one they no longer need? Thanks 
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, North of East dulwich station is not covered by the Dulwich Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) Suburban requirements.  And 1978 was before this guidance was agreed.  Hi Jenijenjen, We have vacant sites and sites that for certain heights would likely become available. Giibs & Dandy vacant builders yard - neighbours I've spoken to of this site are extremely concerned about what the council may now approve. Kwik Fit, Goose Green Trading Estate instantly come to mind as sites where tall buildings would bring a significant offer to the freeholders to see the sites up. The Southwark Plan treats Giibs & Dandy + Kwik Fit as one site suitable for residential redevelopment. It also lists the Trading Estate for this as well. See page.84 https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Southwark Plan 2022 reduced 1.pdf Do you think developers having seen the council approve a 9 storey redevelopment are more or less likely now to seek the same at other East Duwlcih locations?
    • It's not very important in the great scheme of things, just a tiny piece of ED history! My OH will remember, having a less ancient brain than mine!
    • I've got one you can borrow. I'll message you the details.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...