Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm feeling a bit torn. I've just sold something on ebay for more than ?10 more than it costs in the shops.


I was transparent about what it was and the cost of it at retail, yet the bidding went a bit mad towards the end and someone chose to spend ?37 on something they could buy elsewhere for ?25. I can't help but think she must think it's something else and feel bad taking the money.


Is it a case of caveat emptor (been reading that a lot on here this week) and should I shut up and spend my ill-gotten gains on some fabulous Diptyque candles from CharlieCharlie, or should I give her some money back to soothe my pricked conscience?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10155-moral-maze/
Share on other sites

I've noticed that bidders can go completely mad at times. Complete the sale: take the payment and deliver the item. If the buyer is dissatisfied you'll soon know about it by way of a SNAD dispute - in which case you may have to make a full refund. No point in pre-empting the issue. Just my opinion.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10155-moral-maze/#findComment-300702
Share on other sites

Aaah Rosie, you gave her fair warning.

You told her about caveat emptor, so she knew you had an empty cave ready to stash all the dough you was gonna fleece offa all the rubes, suckers and hicks.


I'm prouda ya RosieH, 'bout time we had a Sergeant Bilko figure on the EDF.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10155-moral-maze/#findComment-300712
Share on other sites

You must have seen these places in the far flung colonies where a person gathers together a bunch of people by claiming huge discounts on goods and proceeds to push the price up by getting mates to keep bidding, its one of the oldest scams in the world. What happens is the crowd become overcome with the desire to purchase this product simply because its being auctioned so therefore must have a value.


E bay is simply the 21st century version of this but without the shill.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10155-moral-maze/#findComment-300743
Share on other sites

Rosie from a purely pragmatic point of view there is no moral obligation upon you even if the person paid ?100. They were in an open bidding competition and they chose how much they were prepared to pay.


But the person whose life is run on pure pragmatism is hardly human.


The issue is not whether it is wrong or right but that it is bothering you. That fact that it is means you are one of those people with an annoyingly overdeveloped sense of fairness. It can be a right bastard sometimes but experience has shown me that if it bothers you now it will carry on bothering you and so you may well feel a lot better if you just bung the person ?10 back.


It doesn?t really make any sense but at least you can take some solace in the fact that even though you?re a bit of a bleeding heart at least you aren?t a cunt like every other cunt in this fucking world.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10155-moral-maze/#findComment-300759
Share on other sites

It's called capitalism - any good has a cost, which you Rosie have paid. It also has a value, best decided by the market. Your buyer is presumably satisfied else they would have bought at that price. They may value the joy (??) of buying on ebay, the fact that they didn't have to go out to the shops, that they live 200 miles from a Boots.


Hang on to your profit and use it wisely - beer, wine, chocolates, washing up liquid, charity donation, garden seeds, the choice is yours.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10155-moral-maze/#findComment-301006
Share on other sites

I think I've figured out what might have happened in this case. A bidder mistakenly bid ?35 thinking the item was priced in US dollars. That bid was cancelled either at the last minute or just after the auction had ended leaving the person who had just outbid him or her as the winner.


A misunderstanding by one particular bidder fuelled a bidding frenzy leading the winner to pay over the odds.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10155-moral-maze/#findComment-301008
Share on other sites

I've only recently got hooked on the buy and sell section and I think it's great.


RosieH, I've bought and sold on E Bay. My conscience would be pretty clear if I was you. E-Bay self regulates.


It was a lesson to me when I bought the Nintendo Wii for my son two or three years back ( when they were launched). I hadn't anticipated the arrival of the wii but plenty did. People bought with the absolute knowledge that they could flog them on e-bay for an approximate ?100 instant profit. I paid over the odds but I was grateful to obtain an item that I couldn't get in the shops.


Your buyer has to accept responsibility fot their own bidding. That's the way e-bay works . It and you are not registered charities.


I am actually curious as to what body ltion is worth ?35.::o

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10155-moral-maze/#findComment-301040
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...