Jump to content

Buying a house in East Dulwich? expect sealed bids!


Pendragon

Recommended Posts

We got our house just in 2006 and just had it valued last week. I had expected that it had probably stayed about the price given all the media hype about falling house prices etc. Totally not the case in ED. Someone earlier posted that they thought prices had gone back to 2007 peak prices - from our personal experience I would totally agree.


According to Winkworth's, a nicely done up 3 bed (with potential to do loft/side return etc) will go for just under 600k


I think that's a lot but apparently that is the going rate at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which one? The one at ?565 or the one at ?575?


Pix of the inside and outside of both houses are on the Winkworths website, btw.


I find it worrying from many points of view, but not from a purely selfish point of view :))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see the problem with sealed bids. If the asking price is too low and lots of people want to buy the property then its the quickest way to get the best offer for the buyer.


The agent acts for the seller so its his job to get the best price surely.


We moved to ED in 2001 and we bought our house under a multi agent sealed bid process. Yes we overpaid I guess but if you intend to live in the house for the long term then the element over the asking price is not likely to be a major amount of money when you look back 5 or 10 years later.


My view is if you really want the house - and you are going to live there long term - then bid what you need to to get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TheAllSeeingEye Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Its the popular, young

> professionals flats (typically 2bed garden) and

> the small family homes, that are gold dust at the

> moment.


Very true, I work for a local agent and we have a number of large houses in good structural and decorative order, in good locations and for realistic prices which have been hanging around on the market for a number of months, however we are getting rid of two bedroom garden flats like no-ones business! The majority of my buyers are looking for this kind of flat up to about the 250 range

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rather than talking about asking prices and estate agent valuations the only figure that really matters right now is what surveyors put in their reports. Are the valuation surveys matching the accepted offers?



I've heard of one instance in Telegraph Hill where ?30K was knocked off the final price (?440K down to ?410K for a 3 bed family house) due to the mortgage valuation. What's happening on this point in ED?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The valuation reports can also hinge on how much of a deposit the buyer has. For example if you are putting down forty or fifty percent then there is a better chance of not having it downvalued. And if you can show that other similar properties have sold for similar prices then it would usually go through.


edited due to addition

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My feeling - and I could, of course, be wrong - is that anyone who buys a place for top price before the election is taking a risk. There's no telling what a few weeks of confusion and chaos amid a hung parliament could do for the markets and the pound. All it would need is a hefty rise in interest rates and there'd be big trouble. There was an interesting statistic in the latest Northern Rock results: 4% of their mortgagees are having problems making payments. That's with rock-bottom rates.


This might just be wishful thinking. I'm very much of the opinion that ?500,000-plus for a basic three-bed Victorian terrace, the sort of home that only a couple of decades ago was very much within the reach of people on ordinary wages, is not only absurd but downright immoral. Bring on a huge house price crash. And I say that as a home owner. If it sends some estate agents over the edge then all the better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PeterW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

I'm very much

> of the opinion that ?500,000-plus for a basic

> three-bed Victorian terrace, the sort of home that

> only a couple of decades ago was very much within

> the reach of people on ordinary wages, is not only

> absurd but downright immoral. Bring on a huge

> house price crash. And I say that as a home owner.


xxxxxxxx


Agreed. Just wait till I've sold mine :))


:-$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"This might just be wishful thinking. I'm very much of the opinion that ?500,000-plus for a basic three-bed Victorian terrace, the sort of home that only a couple of decades ago was very much within the reach of people on ordinary wages, is not only absurd but downright immoral"


In the early 80s crash the Price to Earnings ratio for property fell to approx 2-3x followed by a peak at 4x in 1989

This ratio has been steadily moving upwards over time due to increase population growth/wealth etc

They say this long term trend will continue upwards but in the short term the multiple should probably be about 3-4x earnings? Factors like the weak pound help but unemployment hurts...

This is all very back of the envelope stuff - but absolute values don't really mean anything ('?500k is too much')

It's currenlty at 5x earnings again so this'll probably correct back down to 4x soon as it seems too pricey???

At least that's my basic understanding of things


I personally agree that prices are too expensive in the short term BUT that we'll hit 5x in another 10 years or so....


edited to add p/e chart

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you have to separate the two concepts of house prices nationally and the specific house price rise in ED though.


The issue nationally is a major fuck up for this country where most new builds are bought by buy-to-let landlords and the average age of a first time buyer is 38. Problem is to readjust the market lots of people are going to lose a lot of money but if you don?t do anything it will have major social and economic impact.


The issue with ED specifically as a market is that (for better or worse) it is a much more desirable area than it was 10 years ago and offers more than the surrounding areas do. It is only natural to expect the houses here to be higher priced when compared to neighbouring areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • FH is so much greener and IMO nicer than ED, sorry. Less commercialised.  The Great North Wood, Hornimans Gardens, Brenchley Gardens, One Tree Hill ) yep, some of that borders ED, so split between the two) 
    • Tesco sell pudding rice https://www.tesco.com/groceries/en-GB/products/254877391   And as for olive oil, my preference is the Spanish 2L cans in Sainsbury, it has a real nice peppery taste, not bland like the Italian one's I've tasted, but that's personal preference I suppose. 
    • It feels like a group who don't believe that private motoring should be discouraged and have no answers to the air quality problem, whereas the original Cleanairdulwich are campaigning to reduce pollution. Sadly we live in a world where if you are rich, you will generally live in nicer houses, have nicer environments and cleaner air.  That is capitalism for you, but I doubt whether there would be greater health equality in the former Soviet Union either.  Dulwich village was once full of industrialists and the like who didn't want to live in polluted central London where most would have made their money.  I will contact Cleanairdulwich and hopefully provide a better perspective.  Whether it is one individual or a whole community I support agree with what they are doing.  
    • ??? When they refer to "all Dulwich", I took that to mean including the residents of the streets where the traffic has been directed into due to the LTNs, which are presumably experiencing greater pollution/stress,  whereas the "privileged few" in the LTN areas are experiencing lower pollution due to less traffic. Hence the reference to inequality. Sorry if I've got the terminology wrong.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...