Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> An interjection eh? Hmmmm...definitely one for

> the Drawing Room...had to look that one up...

>

>

> Definition of interjection on the Web:

>

> ejaculation

>

>

>

> My mistake old bean.


To be fair I think LM may have been confused by the syntax/grammar employed by Brendan. Had he said "what up with that, man" [note my insertion of the comma] his meaning may have been clearer, no?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10185-friday/#findComment-301321
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Balls, cock and nonsense!

>

> I was being perfectly clear.



Well there's no need to get all baity about it old thing. Whilst I don't wish to pick a fight with the [allegedly] scrummiest male forumite, I am obliged to point out that had you been "perfectly clear" LM would have not got confused in the first place, but she did, so you weren't.


Quad Erat Demonstrandum.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10185-friday/#findComment-301325
Share on other sites

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> To be fair I think LM may have been confused by

> the syntax/grammar employed by Brendan. Had he

> said "what up with that, man" his meaning may

> have been clearer, no?


*raises flute of organic prosecco to legalbeagle*


thanks for that legalbeagle...that was exactly how I read it...



*shrugs shoulders and has another slurp of the rather moreish beverage*

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10185-friday/#findComment-301330
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It was typed as clear as day. I in no way stated

> that commas would or would not be used.

> Misinterpretation is therefore the liability of the reader.



Ambiguity is most strongly construed against the party using it: Ambiguitas contra stipulatorem est.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10185-friday/#findComment-301335
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It was typed as clear as day. I in no way stated

> that commas would or would not be used.

> Misinterpretation is therefore the liability of

> the reader.

>

> Caveat emptor.


Rightie ho. If you say so dear.


[rolls eyes and toddles off to join LM for a glass of bubbly]

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10185-friday/#findComment-301336
Share on other sites

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> karter Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Yes it's Friday. This means that on Saturday

> > morning the streets of ED will be full of

> sh!te,

> > blood and vomit, once again.

>

> Yes, sorry about that karter...I'll try and

> restrict my alcohol intake tonight...


Thanxs LM, and please no not be going on my doorstep, you know it aint right.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10185-friday/#findComment-301340
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does that mean I win?

>

> Rock on!

>

> Rock on indeed.



Yes dear. Of course it does. It has been shown to all that despite someone saying you confused them, you did not cause any confusion. Well done you!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10185-friday/#findComment-301342
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No they aren't. You're coming across as a smug, superior liberal, and that's what old fashioned voters (labour, Cons and now Reform) hate. That 'the deplorables' 'they're all ignorant racists' line is what's driving people away from the traditional parties and towards Reform.  You're as guilty of looking back as Labour. This is a new, post-europe world and we all need to come to terms with that, make do with what we have, and move forward.       
    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government  Specifically Chris mason - a not very bright right leaning stooge - large part of why bbc news has become grok-level slop  
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...