Jump to content

Recommended Posts

thexwinglessxbird Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Pirate, how awful!! You poor thing.

>

> For years I have cut through this park, mainly at

> night & can't help but always point out about the

> COMPLETE lack of lighting. We really must complain

> about this. It wouldn't hurt the environment to

> have a couple of solar energy lights down this

> path. It's rediculous that it hasn't already been

> thought up or done. It screams danger.



Why would cut through this park if it screams danger to you?

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Last night all three gates of the park were

> firmly

> > chained up.

>

> Yes, and they forgot to unchain one set of them by

> 1.00pm today!


xxxxxxx


Oh dear. Maybe, like me originally, they thought there were only two gates :)


Which one was still chained up?

Clearly the miscreants involved are not troubled by the lack of light. I understand it is because they have polished their corneas like Riddick out of Near Dark!


An alternative to chaining the place up would be to send in a decoy, apparently vulnerable but armed to the teeth, who could lure the buggers out with the promise of easy pickings and then nab/clobber the lot.

Domitianus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> An alternative to chaining the place up would be

> to send in a decoy, apparently vulnerable but

> armed to the teeth, who could lure the buggers out

> with the promise of easy pickings and then

> nab/clobber the lot.


How about tomorrow night then Domitianus? ;-)

Pirate78 - what an awful experience, I hope that you recover from this very soon. I have always been a little apprehensive about taking that short cut on my own and this is a sad reminder not to be complacent, thank you for posting the warning on here.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Domitianus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > An alternative to chaining the place up would

> be

> > to send in a decoy, apparently vulnerable but

> > armed to the teeth, who could lure the buggers

> out

> > with the promise of easy pickings and then

> > nab/clobber the lot.

>

> How about tomorrow night then Domitianus? ;-)


I am dusting down my Batman outfit as I type (I believe you women call that 'multi-tasking' and make a big deal out of it!)

I avoid the park short-cut at any time.


Even the road route is dark, there just seems to be so little lighting there. I've had to run into the road and into the traffic coming out of Sainsbury's DKH on one occasion to try to shake off a couple of guys who seemed to be after me. If you are on foot, going to Sainbury's is fairly unfriendly, all things considered. One reason I hardly go there.

Below is the reply I just got from Sainsburys. Sounds like they'll do something but I don't understand why they need to discuss lighting with the councilor when it's their park so I assume they should be footing the bill.


Dear Sophie


Thanks for your email. I'm sorry that the park next to our store is posing a problem to customer?s safety. I understand that this is worrying as many of our customers use the park as access to the store.


I have called the store and spoke to the Deputy Manager David who confirmed that the Dulwich store and in negotiation with the councilor to get the park lights installed. For the moment the park gates will be locked at dusk to help prevent any customers being assaulted endangering themselves. This is done each evening by one of the store security guards.


We're grateful for your feedback as it helps us improve our products and services. I hope that you see a change soon and customers feel safer on their way home.


We look forward to seeing you in store soon.

Dear all


I've been asked to look into this on a separate thread http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,420686,429355,page=3#msg-429355 but thought it would also make sense to post it here. I?m sorry to hear about what happened Pirate78 ? it sounds awful.


I?ve been in touch with Veronica Ward, one of the Labour councillors for South Camberwell. They have been talking to Sainsbury?s about this for some time. Sainsbury?s are meant to ensure that the park is closed when it is dark, but they have been careless about opening and closing times.


Unfortunately the management at Sainsbury?s has changed over time and there is no corporate memory of earlier discussions with the councillors and the community about the park.


The person currently at Sainsbury?s that Veronica has been in touch with is Pete Brown. I will add my voice to Veronica?s and ask him to see that this is resolved, highlighting the recent incident. It always helps though if others are able to lobby him (or other members of the Sainsbury?s management) when in the store.


If Sainsbury?s can't look after the gates then we will ask them to provide lighting. (The response to sophiesofa's suggests they are considering this - whether this is in response to the recent incident or something longer term I don't know).


I will let you know if I hear anything else.


Very best

Oliver

Thanks Oliver and well done Sophie. Sophie, who was it at head office you contacted? I will contact them separately to add my concerns and keep the pressure on and I'm only sorry it took a nasty incident to get me to do this. (Sorry Pirate78, hope you're ok)
Great - I'll do that Sophie. I also checked who is responsible with Sainsbury's. I was told that Claire Hodder is responsible as the Regional Estates manager for London ([email protected]) by Emily Annable who is responsible for Property Communications ([email protected]) so I'm going to email them both too.

sophiesofa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks ladymuck lets just hope they sort out the

> lights asap.


Yes...I shall be taking a leaf out of your book and filling out a complaint's form when I do my big shop tomorrow...it can't hurt...though (granted) I should have done it earlier.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think it’s directly related because a major factor in so few houses actually being built despite the demand is  a) financial incentives for builders isn’t there. Longer they wait to build the more prices go up. Because too many people want prices to go up    b) nimbys. In expensive houses.  Don’t build here it will devalue my property   Because my property price has to go up 
    • Some of these things are going on for quite a while, and consistently. I'm just guessing but it seems better organised/choreographed than just a back garden shindig or kids chucking them around. Surely it's got to be wedding venues etc that are putting them on or maybe just allowing them...?
    • It is. It's just not gonna happen. London is supposed to get 440,000 new homes by 2030. Just 10,000 were completed in 2024-2025 so housing supply is barely growing. Meanwhile, housing demand continues to increase. Net migration to the UK was +204,000 in 2024-2025 (and that's a big drop from the previous year). Of those people, about 25% will come to London ie 51,000 people. The average occupancy of a home in London is 2.5 persons i.e. we should have built 21,250 new homes in London just to keep the current supply equalised with current demand. But we didn't - we built half as much. We're not even keeping things steady with new housing, let alone improving the structural long term shortage. That's not helped by NIMBYs and politicians like @James Barber opposing new housing on infill sites like the old Jewsons yard. But I don't see how people complaining about more tax on £2m homes affects any of that one way or the other. Perhaps I'm being dense. https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/press/net-migration-falls-78-in-two-years-returning-to-pre-brexit-levels-every-major-immigration-category-except-asylum-declines/ https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1ldgqvypqpo https://www.hbf.co.uk/news/urgent-government-action-needed-to-prevent-london-housing-delivery-collapse-warns-hbf/ https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/householdcharacteristics/homeinternetandsocialmediausage/bulletins/householdandresidentcharacteristicsenglandandwales/census2021  
    • That is true, but that short burst of intense noise can cause life-changing, long-term damage and consequences for pets and their owners. A quick internet search shows there is a developing craze for as-loud-as-possible fireworks- the emphasis is on how much of a bang they make, not on the visual aspect. What is it that people love so much about this and why do they think it is okay to impose it on everyone else? I am appalled that the government clearly have no intention of doing a thing about it. Our allegedly 'green' council should probably take a closer look. If we start having fireworks going off every night for 6 months of the year, that is going to have a variety of environmental impacts.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...