Jump to content

Shocking car crash on Overhill Road


Recommended Posts

Saw this crashed at the junction of overhill road and lordship lane this evening at about 6pm. Anyone else see this? Two other vehicles involved (out of shot). I see idiot drivers all the time using the bus lane in this area of the south circular, usually driving at breakneck speeds. Any know if this is anything to do with that?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Potentially, although there was debris some 20-30 metres behind it on the bus lane. This indicates to me that there was a collision with another car previous to this incident, which then caused the white car in the picture to lose control and crash. Only a car travelling at speed could crash some 20-30 metres down the road from an initial collision.


Miss Marple signing off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I too hope that nobody was seriously hurt. That white car was pretty shocking to see yesterday as I cycled past. Lordship Lane is 20 MPH from Goose Green to Belvoir Road where it suddenly becomes 30 MPH. Not that 20 MPH seems to mean much to most drivers. Yesterday I was tootling along at 20 and had a black cab behind me flashing his lights and hooting at me all the way from the Library to Mrs. Robinson. Yes, coming the other way towards Belvoir you get lunatics using the bus lane at high speed (not even 30) to undercut drivers actually obeying the speed limit. If one of those drivers is turning left into Belvoir... well...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a similar collision involving two cars on Melbourne Grove ( north side ) around 7am on a Sunday two weeks ago. Both cars sustained major damages but all occupants appeared ok. Was surprised given this incident did not take place at the bend of the road and is usually quite at this time with full view of oncoming traffic.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Modern cars are designed to 'crumple' apparently catastrophically, but this protects the area where people sit - the force of the impact being taken and absorbed by the outer shell. So nowadays crashes often look very bad, but people are more likely to walk away from them relatively unhurt. From the photograph you can see that the front windscreen appears undamaged - which suggests that the impact force was mainly taken by the front box before it reached the driver/ any passengers.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe if you lived 20 metres from the accident, cycled on this part of the south circular every day and had to deal with moronic speeding drivers using the bus lane every day illegally, recklessly and incredible dangerously knowing that it was only a matter of time before something like this happened. Then no. It is not strange. Thanks though Growlybear.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Growlybear Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why would anyone who wasn't involved personally

> take a photograph of a car accident? It seems

> very strange.


As a damned good warning to others that this is what could happen to them if they carry on treating the South Circular as a racetrack?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I passed this yesterday. In all the commotion I couldn't believe what I was seeing..... a group of school kids at the pedestrian crossing were filming and taking pictures with their phones whilst the ambulance crew were trying to pull one of the casualties out of the car on to a stretcher! I felt so angry I wanted to shout at them but thought i should concentrate on my driving. Unbelievable!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks anywhere else is there a map




icker Basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> alice Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I thoughts all southwark was 20mph

>

> Except where TfL are in charge of the road, which

> in Lordship Lane is between Melford Road and Wood

> Vale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure where there's a map, but I'm sure road signs do the trick if you need to know.


As a motorcyclist who is allowed in this bus lane (not all, but this one) who lives off Overhill I'm interested in this. There may well have been a driver going too fast up the bus lane, but if someone turned left across them and hit them that sounds all too familiar. I've had people cur across me who clearly haven't checked on a number of occasions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live on Belvoir road and many times a day drive this junction . Every day I'm cut up by someone who thinks its ok to use the bus lane early to turn into overhill road which then turns into belvoir . It's such a road rage junction ! I've been fighting the council who wanted to add a two way cycle lane down to this junction . This in my opinion will just add to more accidents and sooner than later a death .

I am grateful for this picture as I can add it to my other crash witnessed by me to add to my arguement as to why this is a very dangerous corner !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • 57% of those who actually lived in the consultation area I believe. Around 3,000. Presumably 2,000 of whom are the ‘supporters of One Dulwich (but not members of One Dulwich? So how does one ‘join’?) So tell us about it. it seems fairly clear that Southwark could have done more first time round as they did open the junction back up to emergency services. I’m not sure why this suggests someone shawdowy is ‘pulling their strings’ though as you suggest. You say read up on it - why not share the evidence that emergency services were knocking on the council’s door for months and months?  You’ve just posted a claim the the LFB haven’t been consulted this time round, yet their spokesman says  “Regarding the FOI, the local authority did consult the Brigade. However, they didn’t initially contact the specific Southwark team, who responded on the FOI saying they hadn’t been contacted.” I have answered all your questions that are actual question. You ducked and deflected my two simple questions for several pages, before awkwardly distancing yourself from the claims made in the missive you shared 😳 A question that says “do you agree with a design that does nothing to stop persistent number plate covering offenders” is what’s called a loaded question. Whether one say yes or no it accepts the premise. It’s the classic ‘when did you stop beating your wife” construction, and it’s not very subtle.    
    • Can someone please explain who "one Dulwich" are?
    • We are actually referred to as "Supporters"...2,100 of us across Dulwich...read and weep! 😉   https://www.onedulwich.uk/supporters   Got it, the one where 64% of respondents in the consultation area said they wanted the measures "returned to their original state". Is that the one you claim had a yes/no response question?   Well I suggest you read up on it as it is an important part of the story of utter mismangement by the councils and this is why so many of us can't work out who is pulling the council's strings on this one because surely you can agree that if the emergency services were knocking on your door for months and months telling you the blocks in the roads were delayihg response times and putting lives at risk you'd do something about it? Pretty negligent not to do so don't you think - if I was a councillor it would not sit well with me?   Careful it could be a Mrs, Miss or Mx One.....   Of course you don't that's because you have strong opinions but hate being asked for detail to.back-up those opinions (especially when it doesn't serve their narrative) and exposes the flaws in your arguments! 😉  As so many of the pro-LTN lobby find to their cost the devil is always in the detail.....
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...