Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So now we know that 24 Tory won marginal constituencies ommitted expenses from hotel expenditure to travel in their campaign accounts, that if included would have meant an overspend, which is a criminal offence, that can mean both a fine and up to a year in prison for the MP concerned and/or the electoral agent they used.


Tory central office is trying to explain it away as an administrative error and that those expenses were part of central campaign funds relating to the battle bus. But they didn't declare them there either.


If the electoral commission rules that the spending was local, not central, are we going to see bi-elections, of which the Tories only have to lose six, to lose their majority.


Interesting times.

If the electoral commission decide they overspent there will have to be bi-elections and prosecutions. Given that most of those Tory seats were won with margins of between 300 and 3000 votes, there is a good possibility they could lose enough seats to lose their majority. We saw what happens when electoral fraud takes place in Tower Hamlets. Overspending on campaign limits is also electoral fraud. It's very serious.
They don't have to lose them to Labour. Pretty much any other party would join a coalition to overturn the Tory majority. And they only have to lose 6 to lose that majority, and only 10 to wipe out the DUP factor. Given that most of the seats were won with majorities of less than 3000 votes, you would expect the other parties to work hard to get their voters out. I think it could be an interesting exercise and only a fool would never say never at the moment.
And just to add that I find the silence on this deafening. Electoral fraud is serious, except it seems when the Tories are at it. The exposure of this is solely down to the excellent journalists at Channel 4, the only media organisation it seems that has no qualms of exposing corruption irregardless of the political party guilty of it.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And just to add that I find the silence on this

> deafening.


True - the other main parties don't seem to have done a very visible job of complaining. Which can only mean they're all at it :-/

Blah,

For clarity, if this scenario you spell out plays out, would you view it in the spirit of democracy that we have a change of government due a few spads not having stayed outside the ring road? And / or do you believe the public were defrauded, and would have voted differently had they known that these MPs had overspent their campaign budgets with respect to hotels?

I think it would be in the spirit of democracy to re-run those elections yes. Criminal fraud is serious, esp when it comes to elections. It is also the case that in marginal seats, foot soldiers are extrememly important and effective in reaching voters. The reason why there are spending limits set in law is so that no party can outspend another to victory. These overspends paid for party activists to stay in the constitutency for the puspose of campaigning on behalf of the MP standing. So yes, it matters deeply.

No they weren't charged to the national expenses at all. They were left off any accounting completely.


And the rules are clear on what constitutes national and local spending. The cost of a hotel in a constituency to put up activists is a local expense. Head office are trying to claim that can be included as a national expense. It will be for the electoral commission to decide, but if they decide it is indeed a local expense, then the electoral agent in those 24 constituencies of guilty of both overpsending on limits and not reporting those expenses. It IS a criminal offence to do that with a fine and up to a year in prison as a consequence for both the MP concerned and the electoral agent. It's pretty serious stuff.

I agree with rahrahrah that is the most severe outcome that's probable or that would be proportionate.


Its worth noting what the Commission has said on this to the press: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/tory-mps-broke-election-laws-7467576


...the Commission added: ?We?d usually consider a national bus tour paid for and authorised by a political party to constitute party campaign spending where it is intended to promote electoral success for the party by the election of candidates standing in the name of that party.?


Given the above, I'd put the probability that this turns into anything at zero. That's probably explains the general silence you find so terrifying.

  • 3 weeks later...

As suspected, more evidence that everybody is at it: http://order-order.com/2016/05/17/top-libdem-avoided-overspend-by-not-declaring-battle-bus/


(Summary: Lib Dem didn't declare cost of bus for bringing campaigners to his constituency. Another over spender.)

Yep, Labour too:


http://order-order.com/2016/05/16/two-more-labour-candidates-didnt-declare-election-buses/


They would have to prove that these were *deliberate* attempts to overspend, rather than just accounting errors, for there to be a rerun of the poll. That's unlikely.

I don't think the Libdems ever have the budget to overspend on anything though. And what has gotten the Tories into trouble is that items haven't been accounted for on either their local OR national accounts (namely the hotel spending). There's creative accounting and there's not even accounting for things at all. Overpending at national level is just a fine compared to overspending at local level being a criminal offence, which makes no sense at all either.


Of course, whether prosecutions happen or not, the PR damage is done.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't think it is time restricted...the Southwark noise team's website says....(oh and look at the very first item on the list....;-))   Noise issues and nuisances that we can deal with We can help if you're being disturbed by noise coming from: amplified music TV parties nightclubs and pubs including people outside making noise DIY home renovation some construction sites barking dogs alarms / car alarms odours and fumes from commercial properties smoke commercial venues and events dust or noise from some works or equipment in the street fireworks at night from 11pm to 7am - extensions exist for the following festivals: first day of Chinese New Year until 1am the following day on the day of Diwali until 1am the following day New Year's Eve until 1am on New Year's Day 05 November until midnight
    • Surely nobody is going to want books in poor condition, unless they are rare and possibly valuable?
    • Is that not only true within certain hours? I just did a quick Google and this came up (not specifically Southwark): The Noise Act 1996 defines "night hours" as 11 pm to 7 am, and local councils can take action if noise levels are excessive during this time. This means they can issue warning notices or even investigate for a statutory nuisance if the noise is particularly disruptive, according to Gov.uk.  I'm sure it's more complicated than that, and I'm sure it's been discussed on here before, though I can't remember which thread.
    • Get on those waiting lists asap if you haven't already. I waited till after the birth and it was very challenging getting a place once our daughter turned 1.  She ended up at LEYF Camberwell (we had to accept 2 days to start and gradually got to ramp up 5 days). She absolutely loved it there after an initial shaky start but her key worker and team worked really hard to settle her in. They spent a lot of time giving her cuddles and making her feel safe. Great outdoor space and really caring, enthusiastic staff with low turnover. Would highly recommend. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...