Jump to content

Recommended Posts



Police have confirmed to the News that a teenager has been stabbed in Hanover Park and Rye Lane in Peckham.


Police were called at about 5.15pm to reports of a man suffering a stab wound.


A 17-year-old boy was taken by air ambulance to a south London hospital where he remains in a stable condition. His injuries are not believed to be life threatening.


Met Police officers have closed the road in Hanover Park.


Bus services: 12, 37, 63, 78, 197, 343, 363 and P12 are being diverted.


Enquiries continue. There have been no arrests.


DulwichFox

I cycled past this 10 mins after it happened but clearly victim and/or perpetrator were still there - lots of police,ambulance and air ambulance hovering above looking for place to land. Big crowd of people laughing, jostling, photographing and videoing events. Made me despair at what humans have become.

Hope victim makes full recovery.

Rye lane is fully covered with CCTV and is full of people day and night. Perfectly safe. Like most stabbings, this was probably between two people who know each other - not a lawless random rampage through bargain basements and pound shops! But you are probably right to not wine there Fox. It's usually fully of drunken students stumbling between Canavans and the Bussey - all a bit too young and exciting for you ;)

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> An isolated incident. Move along. Nothing to see

> here.


Not according to the numerous people photographing and videoing the scene, not just teenagers 'grown-ups' too, even a mum with a little one in a pushchair was straining to get a good angle for her photo. Lowlife.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rye lane is fully covered with CCTV and is full of

> people day and night. Perfectly safe.


How does CCTV keep anyone from being stabbed? It'll make sure the incident is filmed as will all those people who are around day and night.

That's really dreadful...



kristymac1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > An isolated incident. Move along. Nothing to

> see

> > here.

>

> Not according to the numerous people photographing

> and videoing the scene, not just teenagers

> 'grown-ups' too, even a mum with a little one in a

> pushchair was straining to get a good angle for

> her photo. Lowlife.

I remember reading somewhere that when Steven Speilberg was young and sirens were heard in his neighbourhood, his mother bundled the family into the car and went off in search of the emergency. She apparently threw her husband out of the house for being boring.....

Just before you judge the 'lowlife' mother straining to get closer to take a look...


I am a doctor, currently on maternity leave. I was taking my baby for a walk in the buggy and came upon the crowd etc. Just as any of my colleagues would do I quickly spoke to the police and offered to help the young victim, while a policeman kept an eye on my baby (kept v close by, and asleep in the buggy).


As it happens the first two people on the scene included an off-duty nurse and they had done pretty much all the necessary, and there was little for me to do before the paramedics arrived, other than be ready in case he deteriorated.


So that's why there was a mother and buggy keeping a v close eye on things. (I did not take any photos though. Not sure if you made that bit up or there was another mother and buggy close in that I didn't see.)

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This happened in Peckham in broad daylight.. at

> 17.00 ish ?

>

> ..It's one of the reason I would never think

> about wining or dining there in the evening or

> waiting for a bus late at night.

>

> DulwichFox


I used to feel far 'safer' and relaxed in Peckham (eg rye lane, waiting for buses) late at night than I ever did on that uneasy stretch of dog kennel hill in ED by sainsburys, ED station and all the way up to goose green.

> So that's why there was a mother and buggy keeping

> a v close eye on things. (I did not take any

> photos though. Not sure if you made that bit up or

> there was another mother and buggy close in that I

> didn't see.)


Why would I make that up? The woman I saw with a child in s pushchair was standing at the back of the crowd, hence her need to stretch to get a 'good' photo.

Thankfully you were on hand quickly to help and perhaps you were concentrating on the victim to notice just how many lowlife were there. It was horrible, phones out- photographing, videoing, people laughing and jostling. Horrible.

I've seen people doing similar things. I suppose it's always been this way, people in days of old turned up to watch public floggings and much worse. I personally don't get why you'd want to film it, then put it on YouTube or have the images to gawp at yourself, but it's the world we live in

People filming these incidents may inadvertainly be providing evidence useful to police after the event.

So called Police 'super-recognisers' who can put names to faces may well want to look at these clips.


Perpetrators of the crime may well be lurking around in the background.


DulwichFox

Is it legal to post videos of under age crime victims on line without their consent? I can't imagine it is.


Rahrahrah- if you pm me the youtube link I'll contact the company so its taken down.



rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I just checked, it's on You Tube. Pretty clear

> that the police were having to battle with

> 'spectators' to keep them back. :-(

Hi Kristymac1


yes, you're quite right. I had seen a photo on social media that had me (my back thankfully) and buggy in shot standing just nearby after the paramedics arrived and really didn't want people to think I was gawping. Phone was firmly in pocket! I didn't pay much attention to everyone else.


I think the young man will be ok. Poor guy.


J

  • 6 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...