Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Woke-up at 0115 this morning to the sound of clanking - some bright spark in a yellow hi-vis suit up a squeaky ladder fitting these babies, to lamposts only. He went right up the street.

From what I can see an adjacent street has them too.

Obviously some sort of camera monitoring operation (aimed at street) but for what and by whom ?

Just to capture traffic data or live feed ?

What about the item that has appeared attached to the traffic lights at junction of Crystal Palace Rd and East Dulwich Rd ,northbound .Just past swimming pool .


I can't post a pic .Though I feel that were I to try and take one I'd be entered on some surveillence log and arrested .

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What I am interested in is why these were put-up

> at night when this could easily have been do e

> during daytime.

> Was that tactical ?


Perhaps.. Just perhaps they are designed to operate at night and needed to be tested and set up accordingly.


Does seem very strange.. Perhap James Barber can throw some light on the subject.


DulwichFox

After reading this I noticed a camera on the lampost at the corner of Crawthew Grove and Lrodship Lane, pointing straight at the yellow box by East Dulwich Grove. It doesn't appear no streetview (dated April 2015) so must be relatively new.


Maybe this is Southwark's way of financing their water bill repayments?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...