Jump to content

Ken Livingstone - antisemitic?


Earl Aelfheah

Recommended Posts

Ken's comments couldn't have come at a better/worse time dependant on your politics, Sadiq Khan is busily distancing himself and no doubt many Labour supporters and those fighting local elections will be seriously wishing Ken had not become involved. John Mann also will have serious questions to answer regarding his conduct today. Surely the last thing to do as an MP is to have a spat in front of live TV cameras.


Oh well what's next to come along in the news, Cameron must be pleased he is not in the mire today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "anti-semitism means an antipathy towards Jews"

>

> No - it doesn't.



How would you define it then? Not trying to start an argument, genuine question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I agree with Otta. I'm no fan of many policies of the Israeii state, but Israel exists, and that's just a geo-political reality. It's not going away, so why people act like it should/needs to is beyond me.


Israel is surrounded by people who literally want to destroy it. Those who oppose its policies on certain areas - and that includes me - need to remember that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Very broadly speaking, someone who is anti western

> Middle East.

>

> If you want to get technical, then descendants of

> Shem, Ham, Japeth, ... Ishmael et al.

>

> Not someone who is anti-Jewish. If you mean

> anti-Jewish, then say that.



Fair enough. However, isn't there an argument to be made that over time it has become synonymous with solely anti-Jewish sentiment? I think a lot of people would struggle to see a difference. Although you're factually correct, have we perhaps reached the point where it is seen as a default term for hatred of Judaism?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok can someone explain things to me please.


For 100 of years there was anti-semitism across much of Europe. Shakespeare made fun of the Jewish money lender. This play was one of our course books at school. From my understanding in Britain in good times the monarchy were happy to use Jewish money when it was needed, then blamed the samme people when times were bad.


Then things got pretty horrid in parts of Eastern Europe, Russia and Germany. Clearly very horrid.


Then Britain made a hash up of the State of Palestine.


Then the US got seriously involved. And oil prices went through the roof. And then they choose sides between the arab countries they wanted to be friends with to guarantee the flow of oil and pissed off the rest. And then we all got involved in the various messes of Libya, Egypt, Iraq and Syria.


And Iran and Turkey retain massive geopolitical influence. And the US and their allies remain close to Israel.


It all sound like a friggin mess. As is Russia, Africa, SE Asia, and many of the other places the west/East intervenes in.


So I don't hate anyone. Well apart from Bono, but that is trivialising things.


What is wrong with talking about Israel's involvement in all of this? From what I understand there are a spectrum of opinions there too.


Did spend a week or so there in twenty years ago but views from that wont help this thread. I also expect Ken is bloody minded and wont do the decent thing and acknowledge when he has overstepped the mark.


Can someone explain things simply please?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This may help clear things up for some people.

>

> http://www.jewishsocialist.org.uk/news/item/statem

> ent-on-labours-problem-with-antisemitism-from-the-

> jewish-socialists-g?fb_action_ids=1015419463436857

> 3&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_ref=.VyJ65IREqRE.lik

> e


That really is mealy mouthed bullshit. Try this for a historical perspective from the left on left-wing anti-Semitism. http://www.thetower.org/article/the-holocaust-the-left-and-the-return-of-hate/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This may help clear things up for some people.

>

> http://www.jewishsocialist.org.uk/news/item/statem

> ent-on-labours-problem-with-antisemitism-from-the-

> jewish-socialists-g?fb_action_ids=1015419463436857

> 3&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_ref=.VyJ65IREqRE.lik

> e



Oh, so it's Ok because the Internet's found some Jewish people who are OK with this?


Bollox - the leadership of the Labour party is currently a disgrace - nasty extremism is just that at both ends of the political spectrum, and a major political party is now infested with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is another good summary imo: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-antisemitism-row-ken-livingstone-naz-shah-jeremy-corbyn-a7006176.html


I think Ken should be kicked out of the party personally. He's too divisive a figure and his bringing Hitler into a rebuttal against allegations of antisemitism, is pretty bizarre and unhelpful.


That said, there is a lot of mischief making on the part of Guido et al. and I don't buy the accusation that there is some bigger problem with the Labour Party being antisemitic generally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also thought the statement Jah posted was very good (I wouldn't expect a statement from "Jewish Socialist" to be unbiased, but I agreed with a lot of it)


I think some people feel that criticism of Israel - when not accompanied by criticism of, say, Russia, Venezuela, Iran, etc. - is unbalanced and unjustified. Maybe it is. But that still doesn't make it racist...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the statement Jah posted was utter horseshit


"Not all Zionists are Jews" - really? Show me some criticism of Zionists/Zionism that doesn't necessarily imply that they are Jews


"Others represent genuine criticism of Israeli policy and support for Palestinian rights, but expressed in clumsy and ambiguous language, which may unknowingly cross a line into antisemitism" I don't see much ambiguity or unknowingness in defending a suggested forced Jewish de-population of Israel by reference to Hitler


"Those making the charges now, did not see fit to bring them up at the time, under previous Labour leaders..." Because those making them were so remote from power within the Labour party that they could be ignored; now no longer the case


"The attack is coming from four main sources, who share agendas: to undermine Jeremy Corbyn as leader of Labour; to defend Israeli government policy from attack, however unjust, racist and harmful towards the Palestinian people; and to discredit those who make legitimate criticisms of Israeli policy or Zionism as a political ideology

? The Conservative Party


? Conservative-supporting media in Britain and pro-Zionist Israeli media sources


? Right-wing and pro-Zionist elements claiming to speak on behalf of the Jewish community


? Opponents of Jeremy Corbyn within the Labour party"


Far and away the most vocal attacks are coming from the Parliamentary Labour Party who recognise that (a) this is electoral poison and (b) to their credit, that sometimes things really are black and white and you have to pick a side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pro-Palestine-Anti-State-Of-Israel has been a leftie 'given' for as many years as I can remember, but let's be honest, Ken's lost the plot on this one.


There might have been some kind of point in there (more of a historical footnote than a point I suppose) - but the attempt at making it and, worse still, trying to turn it into anything of value or worth that somehow means something in the current debate defies belief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think some people feel that criticism of Israel

> - when not accompanied by criticism of, say,

> Russia, Venezuela, Iran, etc. - is unbalanced and

> unjustified. Maybe it is. But that still doesn't

> make it racist...


There was a very shouty man on LBC the other day (I'm on a week off - I give my brain a holiday... I don't listen to it on a regular basis... honest) who made that point, something along the lines of: "if you criticise Israel any more than any other nation than you're an anti-Semite". Apart from that being just totally idiotic logic, what irked me is the usually vocal compere just let it slide. Especially in comments sections of papers, Twitter, and the like, there's a really vocal group of people who are ready to strike as soon as any comment is made against Israel. It's like the Putin bots who jump to defend Russia's policies whenever some criticism of them appears. The worst outcome of all of this would be for people to get self conscious about criticising Israel's rubbish record on human rights and multi-culturalism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
    • Now this is cycling  BBC News - Tweed Run London bike ride evokes spirit of yesteryear https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68900476  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...