Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I didn't see it but what Brendan said, especially about Margaret Becket.


The 2010 ballot forms should be specifically for rejecting politicians. When they've all gone, turn the palace into the British Louvre, ship the remaining six honest politicians out to the new parliament on a Grimsby industrial estate, and then hold an election.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> Anyway, what kind of porn is women-friendly porn?

> Is there a lot of holding hands first, with the

> man cleaning-up after himself and possibly

> bleeding the radiators before he leaves?


xxxxxxxxx


:))

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You watched Question Time last night and this was

> the thing that pissed you off the most about it.

> Seriously?


Sorry Brendan, I got in from t'pub and literally saw only the last 2 minutes, so missed all that enraged you.


However it drove me up the wall, because I'd already seen that question answered at a non-televised women's question time this week. You'll be shocked to learn that there was an as-one crowd response then too, only being a group of politically charged women, it was rather less tittery and more jeering. I'd really like to see some sensible / thoughtful debate.


Ms Vrouw, I would offer a lend, but unfortunately it was on my external hard drive which died a horrible death recently (note to self, don't balance your hard drive on a wine box - is just asking for trouble). However, Anna's husband is an old school friend of mine, so I'll see if I can wangle some freebies.

Thats because sex is a participation sport, if you want to get the most out of it.


Although I have indulged in porn watching and will no doubt do so again, I have found it in double quick time, dull and repetitive.


There is nothing like the knowledge and anticipation of fornication and the feeling of a woman beneath ones bones to make a great turn on.


Porn is a very poor second, a wank is never as good as a satisfying shag, especially with a partner who is hot for it.


Finding a compatible partner who is hot for the long haul is the toughest challenge.

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Buy yer own and support the woman!


Yeah! Borrowing porn?! That's schoolyard stuff.


Do things properly. Get down a proper sex shop with your other half and make a day of it. Tell the shopkeeper your likes ("We're quite partial to a bit of teabagging") or dislikes ("We'd rather not see someone curling a chod down onto a coffee table filmed in slo-mo by a camera underneath, pointing upwards") and ask them to pick something out for you.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> PeckhamRose Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Buy yer own and support the woman!

>

> Yeah! Borrowing porn?! That's schoolyard stuff.

>

> Do things properly. Get down a proper sex shop

> with your other half and make a day of it. Tell

> the shopkeeper your likes ("We're quite partial to

> a bit of teabagging") or dislikes ("We'd rather

> not see someone curling a chod down onto a coffee

> table filmed in slo-mo by a camera underneath,

> pointing upwards") and ask them to pick something

> out for you.



Teabagging mmm slightly confused about the whole tea bag involvement in the sex shop? Do they sell teas? Do we have a choice of what teas we can drink post coital. Or does teabagging imply something sexual??? Can you please clarify thanks:)-D

monica this is what i gobbled oops googled :) teabagging is when a man places his scrotum in the mouth or on or around the face (including the top of the head) of another person, often in a repeated in-and-out motion . The practice resembles dipping a tea bag into a cup of tea, though the term could also be interpretted as a combination of "T" (as in testicle) and "bag" (as in the scrotum) in reference to a sexual act. Apparently

Happy to clarify, Monica.


First up, boil the kettle. The water has to be really hot. You'll also need a mug or cup (some say china is best), milk and - naturally - a teabag of your choice. If you prefer your teabagging to be on the sweet side, sugar too.


Place the teabag at the bottom of the cup, then - when the water is boiled, add it immediately to the teabag. Using a teaspoon, squash the teabag into the side and bottom of the cup firmly. Do this between ten and twenty times depending on how strong you like your teabagging to be.


Lift the teabag out, then add sugar to taste, and milk until you reach a 'golden brown' colour.


Finally - lower your scrotum into the waiting mouth of your partner.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government 
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...