Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm trying to establish what would happen with regards to paying back maternity pay if I decide not to go back to work after a year off. I work for a big charity and in our maternity policy, it mentions nothing about having to repay anything from them; all it says is 'The date of your termination of employment may affect the level of payment due to you from the Department of Work and Pensions'. But then in the pregnancy book given to me by my midwife, it says that 'you do not have to repay any of the SMP you received'.


My friend works for a local authority and had to return to work for 3 months after her 12 month maternity leave or she would have had to have repaid some of the money she'd received. So, I'm just wondering what other people's experiences have been? Is it always the case that you have to return to work or repay some payments? (NB. I haven't discussed this with work yet as I don't know what I'll decide to do).


Thanks in advance, Kate.

Hi Kate


You'll need to check your contract, but I believe your employer would have to state specifically in that (or any letter they sent you relating to your maternity pay) that you would be given maternity pay on terms.


SMP is definitely a contractual right, and does not have to be repaid. However, some companies provide additional maternity pay over and above their legal obligations on the condition that the person returns to work after their leave, or else a 'return to work' bonus.


ACAS are a very good source of information on this and other employment law / rights issues.


Good luck!

Mrs Keef works for Guys&Tommys NHS Trust, and I think she said she'd have to go back for 6 months, or have to repay money.


F**kers didn't pay her a penny in the last year though, as they delayed her contract, so she didn't quite qualify. As a result, I don't think she feels any loyalty towards them anymore!

Yep - agree with Moos and Fuschia. Check your contract and any other documentation (e.g. maternity policy/ employee handbook) that is relevant to your leave. Unless there is something specific relating to repayment of discretionary maternity pay, you should be good to keep it all!! Def won't need to pay back SMP.

Hi Kate

I will be taking maternity leave later this year and my company maternity policy specifically states that if I don't return to work I will have to return the 18 weeks full pay I am entitled to. I think they will also get me to sign a letter acknowledging this before I go on leave.

my understanding is that it is the OMP you have to repay and not the SMP...


For example I work for the NHS and their mat leave is 8 weeks full pay, 18 weeks half pay with SMP then 13 weeks SMP & 13 weeks unpaid. I thought that if I did not return for 3 months (can be part time or full time) then I had to repay the OMP (occupational mat pay) which is the 18 weeks half pay......

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...