Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mockney, my nephew is in Iraq at the moment

> working for a security firm. He was formerly a

> soldier in the Royal Engineers and was involved in

> the the war from the start. Doing two tours. He

> also has experience of training and working

> alongside American soldiers and he has often said

> that they are probably amongst the worse and

> indiciplined bunch of arseholes he has ever come

> across. According to my nephew compared to the

> British Army the American military are "f**king

> useless and trigger happy dickheads." Hence my

> lack of shock or surprise.



You should meet their Navy - frightening!

  • 1 month later...

Mockney, you know full well I drink my weight in pints, it's the rest of you who are letting the side down.

I think you'll find that Scotland are collectively known as 6, 7 & 9. Surely they'd be right off the scale compared to bloody Luxembourg!!!!

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, foreign policy speech would always be tricky, but this is jaw dropping

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7012342.stm


This:

'In the Middle East, al-Qaeda was using the "suffering of the Palestinians as an excuse for violence", he added.'

Coming from the party who gave us:

'clear and present threat / WMDs honest / errr he was a bad bloke who killed lots of people / what's that, we've killed a million huh? whoops, still I was right'

that was somewhat rich.


This one's good too

'"That's why Europe can't be a closed Christian club, why a lasting settlement for the people of Kosovo is a defining test for the whole of Europe, and why Turkey should become a full and equal member of the EU."'

Well, firstly it's not, we separated church and state some time ago I believe, and Turkey not getting in has lots to do with a corruption riddled, underperforming economy, an interfering military with a penchant for torture and extra-judicial execution, and armenian-holocaust denial, than with being non-christian.


I always suspected Miliband was a Blair clone idiot, but this is depressing.


and what on earth has:

'He said: "Europe needs to look out, not in, to the problems beyond its borders that define insecurity within our borders.'

got to do with:

'"It doesn't need institutional navel-gazing and that is why the reform treaty abandons fundamental constitutional reform and offers clear protections for national sovereignty.'


The man's a loon!!

I agree with you on most points but on Turkey I think your analysis is out. Notwithstanding a move to more religious parties (similar to Christian Democrats in Germany and other parts of Europe) Turkey is advancing and developing and has a modern economy. You might want to see Palin's New Europe programme as much of this was highlighted/pretty evident. http://www.bbc.co.uk/palin/about.shtml#2

I did and take your points, though they don't necessarily deny mine.

Some economic factors do still fall short including unemployment and debt.

This was frankly true of some of the new members of the rapid expansion into Central Europe over which blind eyes were turned.


Again I don't think this was religious discrimination, but more to do with legacy paranoia about Russian intentions and securing a buffer lest the great bear choose to dominate the region again.

Now the EU creaks as we absorb all their problems, I don't realistically see Turkish entry within the next decade.


And for every Sarkozy and Blair with their religious rhetoric, we have a Zapatero or err... maybe that's about it.

I think my main concern was that I'm not sure Miliband even has much understanding of foreign affairs. This was a scattershot speech which had no sense or cohesion.

Depressing. Bring back Robin Cook at least he was clever....hmm...maybe in animatronic form?

I agree with your assessment of Miliband the much touted rival to Brown and now future favourite for the top job. He does seem to oscillate between views and ideas that often are contradictory of themselves or more suited to a laboratory and not the real world.


In terms of Turkey it has as much right/pedigree to join the EU as the other candidate countries - a point I think you acknowledge in some of those new members who were unsuitably prepared for membership. As you say there was a reason for those countries but again there is for Turkey. The economic advantages and the emphasis on free trade i.e. Europe Lite are compelling propositions. Turkey will , if it does join, provide the engine for growth in the EU for decades to come. it will also bring Turkey and Greece closer together which is as good an outcome as Germany and France being brought together - the rasion d'etre of The Treaty of Rome.

I don't think I ever said Turkey shouldn't join, I took umbrage that Miliband was unecessarily implying that there are religious reasons why it shouldn't.

When we are in a world where Bush harps on about crusades and an innocuous cartoon to stirs up such hysteria, this seemed a pretty daft thing to say.


That said the military continue to fight a pretty brutal kurdish suppression, regularly bomb iraq and are even threatening iran; of course if it's good enough for us ;-)

Without going into a tete a tete, the points where I perceived you to question Turkey's candidacy were "corruption riddled, underperforming economy, an interfering military with a penchant for torture and extra-judicial execution, and armenian-holocaust denial" not its religion and again I think that some of those criticisms bar the last one can be used against a number of the newer entrants - Romania and Bulgaria being perhaps the worst offenders.


I don't quite follow your argument on the Bush and the cartoons. Perhaps I am having a slow day.


Turkey's activities ont he border actually have a purpose as there is a longstanding desire by the Kurds not living in Kurdistan ie. northern Iraq and south east Turkey to break away from those countries to form a larger gretaer Kurdistan. it is obviosuly not a simple black and white issue but I feel that we win the West (self defininig liberals at any rate) are quick to denounce the actions of foreign governments when dealing with terrorists or other 'dissidents'. As you say our hands are not exactly unbloody.

I'm generally pretty quick to denounce my own government's too.


I'm a firm believer that short of threat of invasion, that violence should never be used as policy, at least not without very good reason. Dialogue should always be the number one route.

This is doubly so when you are the one with the power and the strength.


However you look at it, responding to a fifth of your population who'd rather not be ruled by you by sending in the tanks, killing tens of thousands of people, burning thousands of towns and villages, and displacing hundreds of thousand of people isn't really a sensible starting point.


Likewise 'reshaping' the middle east by sending in the tanks, killing hundreds of thousands of people, displacing millions and reducing several towns to rubble is something of a stain on this nation. I no more approve of the one than t'other.

Yes premptive strikes are not the way to go. Diplomacy first is important. To be honest I don't think I am that far away from your view point but your take on turkey seems to me to be overly simplistic. Whereas our involvement in the region is quite frankly brazen, Turkey's is much more nuanced than you appear to give credit. And before you say it I am not an apologist but I do find it trying when armchair generals/politicians (of which we are all guilty at times) think they know best especially from 1,000 miles away. There are so many stories we don't hear every day yet if it is negative we most certainly will.


I'd rather Turkey were on our side and inflenced by us through example and agreement.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Errr could it be because of the noise pollution coming from it perhaps? You may not be able to hear it where you live but anyone on the Dulwich Village side of Lordship Lane all the way to beyond Brockwell Park is being disturbed by it - the sound wash from it is huge and that's a lot of people. As I said before we know people who live nearer to Brockwell Park to us and they say it is unbearable.   To be fair the Emirates moved to a piece of wasteland between railway tracks so it actually in a less densely populated area now and the council actually goes out of their way to try to mitigate the impact on local residents and yes, other than the concerts, you could hear a pin drop on matchdays! 😉 
    • Chains moving in is a sure sign that LL is heading for a fall. They are parasites, waiting for the independents to be successful and then, in partnership with rapacious landlords, they move in and force out those very businesses who have created the market they then seek to exploit. They replace a lively diversity with a bland and predictable offering. Then, when a downturn arrives, they move out, leaving boarded up premises and charity shops. Independent businesses who have worked hard to make a success of their efforts will try to see out hard times as they’ve invested so much. Chains look only at the bottom line and think nothing of closing branches. Chains are liable also to expand too fast, be managed badly and then collapse. Think of Brick House being forced out by Gail’s, the closure of White Stuff (although that chain was replaced by another) and JoJo Maman Bebe. . Sadly, I fear that will be the future of LL. 
    • It’s the impact the festival has on the community, the people living next door to the park who have to endure the thumping music and worse. Then there’s the park and the state it’s left in and the wildlife, especially nesting birds. All the roads going down Denmark Hill towards the park were closed off and roads off half moon lane and going up towards West Norwood closed off with wardens at each end, who were paid by Lambeth Council to stand there for the 4 days.  The festival made the news channels and interviews suggested most of the people attending weren’t fron the local area but places like Ireland and Scotland.  I live a 20 minute walk from the park and could hear the thumping music all day and night. Also the wind certainly carried the smell of drugs to my garden! For 4 days I couldn’t believe how strong it was. 
    • Emirates Stadium is  >60,00 but they tend to be very quiet 🙂 Jokes aside though, it's a case in point. Highbury was <40,000 and was 300M up the road, so there are definitely Islington residents who used to live half a mile from a fairly big football stadium, and now live right by a massive one. One that holds rock/pop concerts too accomodating 70,000 fans whether they like ot or not.   40% of Islington households are in social housing so regardless of when they moved their current homes, they may have had little say in exactly where they are housed.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...