Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Don't be such a wuss Brendan. Call yourself man. You haven't lived until you've had a Zombie in the Black Cherry. It should be part of the EDF initiation rights.


Agree with you about the Absinthe Mockney, it spoils it completely as it's all you can taste until you're halfway through.

I am rather biased. Not available in ED, but lovely stuff. I have wondered if I could convince Black Cherry to carry the black or gold. The old is too pricey for a cocktail, but you wouldn't want to spoil it with a mixer anyway. What a rum!! :)-D

2 topics dear to the Forum's heart on the comment pages today


Forget your bias against the columnists, but I'd be interested in any arguments against them (Monbiot particularly)


Bleedin Libertarians - George Monbiot


You think crime is bad now??? - Polly Toynbee

I just read that George Monbiot article Sean. It raised the question that if libertarian ideals which generally focus around the rights of the individual are put into practice in government, what sort of social obligations would institutions that provide services that we consider to be basic human rights (housing, education, etc) have? Which led me to ask:


In our society where personal banking is becoming increasingly compulsory if you are to be a functional member of society, at what point will access to personal banking become a basic human right?

Brendan, I think that if the premise came to pass (ie individuals not governments were in control) the the concept of "human rights" would be defunct. it would be dog-eat-dog, survival of the fittest - ie pretty much where we started as mammals before we discovered civilisation.

In general Libertarian ideals are that an individual is allowed complete freedom and is not forced into or obligated to do anything BUT they must allow other people leave to do the same. The second part of the statement implies that there is some obligation upon the individual in order to maintain the right to his freedom and quite possibly the need for some kind of law and enforcement.


Surely what you are describing is Anarchy?

Just scrapped a whole page of stuff as it was far too wide-ranging and ended up quite ranty. I can express it better as "what Sean said"


Brendan, what you are describing is pretty much exactly the anarchist ideal. Sadly it simply doesn't function in society anything above a collection of hamlets really. Now throw in an intensely selfish consumerist society and libertarianism boils down to:


"I'm alright Jack, keep your hands of my stack (and my family and mates), someone will step in and take care of you, like a charity, or something...innit"

[in reply to Brendan]

Not really (or should I say not intentionally)


Allowing other people to do the same assumes that everyone has the same goals - Monbiot's article argues (correctly IMO) that the reality of that would mean a land-grab by the fittest who could then turn around and say "well, you had equal opportunity" assuming, in effect, power


Anarchic societies (the theory as I understand it anyway) would not allow that level of autonomy by individuals


This is all very simplistic but I'm quite scatty today and trying to multitask


[edit after MP's post - I'd love to see that page rant ;-) ]


I was drawn to the term libertarian on the back of Bill Hick's description of himself - but then I forget that was 15 years ago.. sighs....

Below is a paragraph lifted from wikipedia (so it could be about Japanese cheeses for all you know) which sums up generally what I have always understood the term Libertarian to mean.


??all human interaction, including government interaction with private individuals, should be voluntary and consensual. Or, to state it another way, they assert that all persons are the absolute owners of their own lives, and should be free to do whatever they wish with their persons or property, provided they allow others the same liberty. They maintain that the initiation of force by any person or government, against another person or their property?with force meaning the use of physical force, the threat of it, or the commission of fraud against someone?who has not initiated physical force, threat, or fraud, is a violation of that principle. They do not oppose force used in response to initiatory aggressions such as violence, fraud or trespassing.?


The way I interpreted the article was Monbiot describing Ridley using these apparent ideals to justify his being at liberty to take risks with other peoples? money. Then going further to say Libertarianism in practice would just be, as Sean said, ?A land-grab by the fittest who could then turn around and say `well, you had equal opportunity` assuming, in effect, power? i.e rampant capitalism.


I must just say that I do not subscribe to any particular school of thought but rather think that different ideas can be applied to societies in different situations and for different reasons. It is just a matter of finding what works, when and how.


Oh and when mentioned Anarchy I was not referring to the socio political ideal of some kind of collective with no leader. I meant the literal meaning of complete chaos and lawlessness.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Where did I say he did a good job? Yup and Corbyn was very close to Len McCluskey and funded by Unite wasn't he...they're all as bad as each other... Labour have to purge their party of the far-left - they're a disaster. Allan Johnson summed it up so well on election night in 2019....  
    • Thank you for the detailed advise @trinidad It is definitely damage we are concerned about. I don’t think Evri would agree to pay the bill to fix our gate or letter box if they were to be damaged as a result of their delivery drivers helper. Our doorbell can be heard from outside when rung so we don’t quite believe the aggressive simultaneous door/letter box banging is necessary. It can be quite a shock it is done very aggressively.  I’ll definitely action the steps you’ve kindly provided along with a phone call tomorrow. I do sympathise with the role drivers have and how busy they are, which is why we tried communicating directly with her but sadly we haven’t succeeded 
    • What outcome would you like? Disciplinary action? Not to have the driver back? Retraining? I know there is alot of pressure on drivers to deliver within a set day. if he slams the gate, is it evidence he is causing damage, or is the noise a irritant to yourself? You could put a sign up or buy a signing asking to close the gate gentle???? can you hear the door bell from the door? he might be ringing, not hearing and therefore knocking. In trhe notes section of the be livery page, there is a note section, although there is not 100 per cent these notes would be read as these drivers are constantly rushing.  I did a google search for you, i found this and you can try the envri website Contact Us | Evri   To complain to Evri, you can follow these steps: Contact Customer Service: Call Evri's customer service at 0330 808 5456 for assistance with your complaint.    1 Write a Letter: Address your complaint to Capitol House, 1 Capitol Close, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 0WH.    1 Use the Official Website: Visit the Evri complaints page on their official website for detailed instructions on how to submit a complaint.    2 Email or Call for Specific Issues: For issues like missing or damaged parcels, you can email or call 0800 988 8888, which is free to call.    1 These methods will help you effectively communicate your concerns to Evri.   My driver is called anthony, he is brilliant to be honest. I cant fault him.
    • When I have more time and energy, I will look up the actual number of votes cast for each party in that election, rather than the number of seats won. I'm interested to see that you apparently  think that  Boris Johnson did a good job of "leading the country through Covid." Is your memory really that short? I won't stoop to calling Johnson and his cronies names in the way that you seem to think is appropriate for left wing politicians. At least the left wing politicians have some semblance of morals and a concern for people who aren't in some over privileged inner circle and/or raking in money for themselves on the back of an epidemic. I'm not going to open a can of worms on here  by commenting on the disgraceful so called "purge". 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...