Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 5 months later...

Guido is four hours into lunch but word is going round that Cable might not be long for this world. Politically that is.


He?s in a meeting with Clegg?


UPDATE: Mr Cable has just walked into Downing Street. Looking as miserable as ever.


UPDATE II: Last tango in Whitehall. Seems Cable held the rose in his lip and bit too deeply.


UPDATE III: Corks popping in Tory circles.


UPDATE IV: Seems the nuclear option bombed?


UPDATE V: Grovelling apology at the eleventh hour? It?s chaos? Guido is hearing twenty different rumours, either way Cable is deeply wounded. BBC says he won?t be waltzing away?

  • 1 year later...

The simple answer would be that he is unable to fulfil his duties as captain with this cloud over him rather than a suspicion that he is guilty and being treated as such.


Huhne is the same. You cannot be a Sec of State whilst fighting criminal charges.

I'm glad Huhne's gone..maybe they'll get someone in into his post (environment) who isn't so keen on burdening british businesses (especially manufacturing) with massive 'tax' in the form of expensive green energy and thus further underminding our competitiveness and actually doing bugger all for the environment other than exportiing the pollution to foreighn manufacturers who undercut us partly as a result of their far cheaper carbon energy use...still makes the usual supects comfortably smug as we get further left behind global trade. Still Evenn more amazing as many of the 'progressives' are always decrying the death of our manufacturing yet they want to add on costs with 'lovely' (read unreliable expensive) wind farm produced electricity. 'Progressives' in not really thinking things through shocker.

I'm not THAT dim. You even reference Huhne so I know that's who you're talking about. Or rather using his resignation to launch yet another cliched attack on "progressives". Who are they by the way? Is there a club? And what exactly is so wrong with them? But it doesn't matter does it?


It's just a paint-by-numbers, lazy terminology you like to bandy about to attack anyone who fits the hackneyed, one-dimensional stereotype that you fixate and froth over.


Are you really interested in debating climate change? Or how to improve the competitiveness of British manufacturing? Or merely metaphorically gobbing in the general direction of "progressives"? I suspect I know the answer. But I'm not that observant.


The bitterest irony is that for as long as you've been on here you constantly bemoan being stereotyped as some raving right-winger and that any who dares break the hegemonic thought on immigration, Europe, law and order etc is branded a Daily Mail reader and the battle is a hopeless one. Yet instead of practising what you preach you're just as bad.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not THAT dim. You even reference Huhne so I

> know that's who you're talking about. Or rather

> using his resignation to launch yet another

> cliched attack on "progressives". Who are they by

> the way? Is there a club?


Yeah, quids, you should really use the correct terminology: it's 'unbathed, looney, sandal-wearing, smug leftie".

Come on David


I contribute plenty of serious stuff in the Drawing Room and elsewhere, even when an honest invitation to debate results in a pile of vitriolic, frothing at the mouth slurring (to mention no names).


I'm regularly in the economic debates, don't see you much in them but being a socialist I guess you've no interest in Economimcs ;-)


I hold impeccably liberal views on the death penalty, racism and foreighn aid to name but 3. (ooh and Foie Gras by the way)


I'm happy to have a seriuos debate on Climate Change but suspect that our views on that are ther same, it's happening and it's man made, but for the interest of our economic well being AND THE FUTURE OF OUR WELFARE STATE I'm not that keen that we export our jobs and pollution to competitor economies that couldn't give a fig. I'm also in the 'bridging' theory that we use Carbon based fuels for now (and for me Nuclear too), especially the cleaner ones combined with cleaner technology, whilst we try and develop non-carbon based ones that can actually match our demand - we are miles away from this at the moment.


We have a platform for developing efficient manufacturing, it's our modern high-tech industries (including car manufacturing) it's where all the workforce work in partnership to try and develop profits, decent working conditions and rfair pay and jobs (ie Honda in Swindon/Nissan in the NE)and not one where belligerent communist/socialist union fight outdated battles from eons ago. (a la Bob Crow and half the Public Sector ones)

*chalks one to d_c, rubs it out, swears under his breath, reconsiders, chalks one to d_c"


Aside from taking the piss, I'm quite interested in this one:


"burdening british businesses (especially manufacturing) with massive 'tax' in the form of expensive green energy and thus further underminding our competitiveness"


I'm assuming that this isn't a rant, so I'd be quite keen on knowing what this is, how it's being paid, who is paying it and how much it is?


In my pathetic existence as a small business chap, I'm aggravated by the price of energy... BUT it's a tiny fraction of my monthly overheads, for instance it wouldn't even pay for half a day of one of my employees.


So it has no impact on my competitiveness compared with, say, having a hangover ;-) If you bung it up to a 10% surcharge it still wouldn't have a greater impact than an extra 5 minutes in the shitter and a swift fag in the carpark.

I think most manfacturers have already realised that the only way to print money by making stuff is to get it done by third world indentured slaves, nothing to do with a massive tax for expensive green energy.


Anyway, sorry to nag, but what is the 'massive tax for green energy'.


I've done a search and can't seem to identify it?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don’t think Reform will withstand the heat of any election.  Finding enough people to stand will be bad enough. Finding credible ones quite a bid tougher  I think yes this government is lacking in a long term plan and has not had a good first year. Today the least.   but the speed with which this was dealt with is a notable shift compared to last 14 years where months would drag by and we would constantly be told to draw a line under  if Labour called an election tomorrow, there is not a single party that could present a better alternative with any credibility. And that’s a low bar Reform are dangerous lunatics but more worrying is the descent of the Tories into the same swamp i also worry that England voters have contracted some melodrama virus after the Tories where we had 5 PMs in almost as many years  it’s ok for governments to be unpopular without needing to have an election every 1-2 years      
    • Well, I made £50 out of it and Alice owes me another bullseye, so I had a good day Clearly the thread has moved on, but just a final few words on Rayner (from me, at least). If she hadn't gone like this (with a chance to revive her career at some point in the future) there's plenty of other stuff loaded up and ready to be fired at her about the motivation, finances and machinations of her move down South. It's not pretty reading. Tawdry doesn't come close. I was born in Ashton Hospital and grew up in Tameside, I've got a lot of friends and family who weren't as lucky as me and didn't make it out, some close to her constituency party, and there's been a lot of bad feeling around 'Our Ange' for a long time. My favourite quote was: 'She should fuck off back to Stockport.' And that was from a party member. The writing was on the wall for her. Moving from Ashton (majority c6.5k, large Pakistani minority, but predominantly white working class and targeted by both the Independent Alliance and Reform) to Hove (majority c20k, neither of these issues with the electorate) was a pretty cynical move, and she's fucked it royally. 'The Honourable Member for Hove and Portslade' will be sleeping a lot easier in their bed tonight. This thread was never supposed to about Labour bashing, and I'm not sure it is. It's definitely descended into 'Whataboutery', and that seems to be the problem, in my mind at least, with British politics. It's playground stuff, he said/she said, blame-game bollocks. Watch PMQs and ask yourself if you'd accept this sort of behaviour amongst toddlers, let alone in an elected parliament. One thing that does stand out is the opposition to Reform across the board, and yet we seem to be sleepwalking towards a likely scenario where Farage could head up a minority Reform government. I've 'followed' politics since the late Seventies - mainly because the BBC News came on right after 'Roobard and Custard' or 'The Magic Roundabout' - and I can't remember an era where both major parties are so bereft of leadership, direction or ideas. There's a certain irony that we'll all be getting a test text on Sunday to warn us of an impending 'National Emergency'. Seems quite prescient.
    • But not old enough to remember the highest unemployment rate, inflation and interest rates in history in the early eighties under the Tories? A rather selective memory you have. There has never been a four-day week: it was a three-day week imposed by the Conservative government under the Blasted Heath.
    • I see that there was a government consultation started in July 2024, a response, and then a revision to the National Planning Policy Framework, and then to the Green Belt guidance in February 2025, https://www.gov.uk/guidance/green-belt .  It includes the updates but doesn't give the nescient much clue of what was materially changed. There will probably be some good, and less good, summaries to be found. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...