Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I sat with Karen and Victoria on the swotty table.


I would have much preferred to sit with Samantha, but she couldn't spell - and was also out of my league. That said, from her current Facebook picture - I'm happy to report that this would no longer be the case.

I remember (vaguely) that for reading there were different colour groups, and that from pretty early on different kids got different work sheets. It becomes pretty obvious anyway when some kids are still reading books with six words per page and others are starting on Treasure Island.


On the bigger issue, my instinct is the same - bright academic kids will do well anyway - but when you have to make an actual decision for your own child it becomes a little less easy. It's a bit like the rehabilitation of inner city primary schools; most parents hang back until the pioneers have got in there, made themselves governors, secured a new 'super head' etc., then gratefully follow behind. Not very noble but completely understandable.

I can see the disadvantages of streaming, demoralising for those in lower sets etc. However, on a practical note, how would a teacher teach a subject where the ability in a class was quite varied - how to stretch the top pupils whilst improving the lower? Engaging pupils across a range of abilities must be difficult and may end up not doing any of them any favours.


Also, the argument of pushing up the bottom even at the expense of the top will not be great for the future of this country - economy, health, research, science, not to mention that we want the next generation of teachers to be bright, motivated so the future generations can benefit - there is already a brain drain going on in the UK. Both needs to happen, I just don't have the answer to an educational utopia!

Pretty much what carnell said.


I went to a state school with limited streaming, ie in the sciences and languages, but not the arts and humanities.


It wasn't a high performing school, but by and large as alumni we run the gamut of possibilities from dead, through prison, to doing alright to doing pretty well, whatever that means.


The brighter kids from good backgrounds seem to all be ok regardless of hanging around with the oiks and certainly some of those from the estates have done really pretty well too.


I liked that my (experimental as huguenot liked to call it) school did this, it offered intangible benefits that streaming and grammar/private models simply can't offer. A different experience, growing up with a much wider range of friends.


I was probably the poster child for the theory, i was always sitting with the oiks, helping them if they found it difficult, encouraging them to want greater things than their parents had mapped out for them, and i in turn got to be cooler than my spoddy middle class background suggested, i got to hang around with nutters and girls out of my league and smoke drugs far too young....I'm not selling this am i.


I get that in this day and age as bob suggests, money makes things self-selecting, but then the school was not great in terms of results or oxbridge candidates, but it had a clear ethos about wanting to create rounded human beings rather than churn numbers through tick boxes(not that you can churn wth a tick box).


Yeah no idea what my point was any more....i'll get my coat.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> david_carnell Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > In my mind, anything that boosts that group

> > upwards (even if at the expense of those at the

> > "top") can only be a good thing in the long-run.

>

>

> Couldn't agree more with this.


I don't. Primary is fine - chuck 'em all in together, but secondary is where you need to match the education to the kid as much as possible.


Having been at a small secondary school where I was, frankly, bored s***less with the level being taught at maths & sciences, I managed to make a right nuisance of myself. Teachers tried to set me a separate syllabus, but you can;t do that for one person in a class of 30. I was then moved (on the advice of the headmaster) to a much bigger school which streamed. Suddenly I was challenged, struggled for a while, but got the hang of actually doing some work and learning.


Sacrificing the smarter kids education can be destructive. Better to stream and apply resources where they are needed.

it just sounds like they didn't have the resources/ability to teach you rather than streaming was the answer.


"Sacrificing the smarter kids education can be destructive" I'm not quite sure what this means. My kids seem pretty bright, they're popular, they've good hearts. They'll do fine in life at whatever they choose to do, they don't need to fly high they just need to be happy (nad have moved out before they're 30).


If they have good memories of school here, get enough qualifications under their belt to do something vaguely interesting or that they're passionate about and manage to make a couple of friends for life then job done.


In fact given that this town is the polar opposite of flying high, i reckon just making it to cork, dublin, london madrid or somewhere that isn't new ross, is really the only ambition i harbour for them!!

Loz - this was talking about streaming at primary school level.


I'm less opposed to an "all-in-one" model as pupils get older anyway and feel that more schools should be able to specialise including in technical/manual/horticultural work.


But the idea of streaming "early primary school" (as per the BBC article in DaveR's link) children makes me feel like we've gone very wrong somewhere.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> But the idea of streaming "early primary school" (as per the BBC article in DaveR's link) children

> makes me feel like we've gone very wrong somewhere.


Well yes - can't disagree with that.

srisky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can see the disadvantages of streaming,

> demoralising for those in lower sets etc.

> However, on a practical note, how would a teacher

> teach a subject where the ability in a class was

> quite varied - how to stretch the top pupils

> whilst improving the lower? Engaging pupils across

> a range of abilities must be difficult and may end

> up not doing any of them any favours.

>

> Also, the argument of pushing up the bottom even

> at the expense of the top will not be great for

> the future of this country - economy, health,

> research, science, not to mention that we want the

> next generation of teachers to be bright,

> motivated so the future generations can benefit -

> there is already a brain drain going on in the UK.

> Both needs to happen, I just don't have the

> answer to an educational utopia!


I meant at secondary, not primary (insert that squiggly mouth emoticon)

When I first started teaching maths the year 7,8 and 9 classes were mixed ability. We used SMILE and SMP and every pupil had their work tailored to their ability. Also the clever kids on level 7 were quite good at helping the weaker ones out since not all the kids wanted to ask the teacher. It took quite a lot of preparation on a Friday afternoon.

Incidentally- the final test on each level and on each topic was marked by the teacher so there was no cheating. I liked it.

In order to maximise C grades the school I taught in had large (32) top classes, large (27-30) bottom classes and the borderline students on C/D were in classes of about 25.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > david_carnell Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > > In my mind, anything that boosts that group

> > > upwards (even if at the expense of those at

> the

> > > "top") can only be a good thing in the

> long-run.

> >

> >

> > Couldn't agree more with this.

>

> I don't. Primary is fine - chuck 'em all in

> together, but secondary is where you need to match

> the education to the kid as much as possible.

>

> Having been at a small secondary school where I

> was, frankly, bored s***less with the level being

> taught at maths & sciences, I managed to make a

> right nuisance of myself. Teachers tried to set me

> a separate syllabus, but you can;t do that for one

> person in a class of 30. I was then moved (on the

> advice of the headmaster) to a much bigger school

> which streamed. Suddenly I was challenged,

> struggled for a while, but got the hang of

> actually doing some work and learning.

>

> Sacrificing the smarter kids education can be

> destructive. Better to stream and apply resources

> where they are needed.



When I agreed with DC's earlier post, I thought (and still do having reread the full post) that he was talking more generally than just saying "chuck them all in together".


Of course bright kids shouldn't be held back, that would just be stupid. But I don't think he was saying that.

The problem is that whatever system we adopt, there will be winners and losers. Because bright kids do best in the company of other bright kids, but if you put bright kids in a mixed-ability class, their performance suffers while that of the not-so-bright kids improves. A sort of regression to the mean effect.

The same with mixed-sex classes - girls on their own do better than boys on their own. Mix them up and boys' performance improves while girls' goes down...

So what to do? send your daughter to a girls' school and your son to a mixed school?

  • 3 weeks later...

Turkey really is an absolute arsehole of a state isn't it (gov't wise).

Oppress minority, when they get riled, oppress them even harder, bomb their villages etc.

Eventually make fragile peace.


Get worried that resurgent minority nationalism in neighbouring states as a result of power vaccuum will cause you difficulties, so leave them to the mercy of really rather evil murderers because that benefits you on two policy fronts.


Ignore international pressure to intercede on bahalf of threatened minoritym then start bombing them yourself when they're doing well against evil murderers on another front. Cite the fact that they're taking up arms against you, or 'the israeli gambit' is it's now known.


http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-29611582

  • 2 weeks later...

we all know that news commentators are the most idiotic creatures on this planet, but i'm amused that Sky News saw fit to read one of these things on air.


On the non-incident of a jogger and david cameron, someone wisely pointed out "what if he'd had ebola or had attacked him in some other way"


The net total stupidity has just increased!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Where did I say he did a good job? Yup and Corbyn was very close to Len McCluskey and funded by Unite wasn't he...they're all as bad as each other... Labour have to purge their party of the far-left - they're a disaster. Allan Johnson summed it up so well on election night in 2019....  
    • Thank you for the detailed advise @trinidad It is definitely damage we are concerned about. I don’t think Evri would agree to pay the bill to fix our gate or letter box if they were to be damaged as a result of their delivery drivers helper. Our doorbell can be heard from outside when rung so we don’t quite believe the aggressive simultaneous door/letter box banging is necessary. It can be quite a shock it is done very aggressively.  I’ll definitely action the steps you’ve kindly provided along with a phone call tomorrow. I do sympathise with the role drivers have and how busy they are, which is why we tried communicating directly with her but sadly we haven’t succeeded 
    • What outcome would you like? Disciplinary action? Not to have the driver back? Retraining? I know there is alot of pressure on drivers to deliver within a set day. if he slams the gate, is it evidence he is causing damage, or is the noise a irritant to yourself? You could put a sign up or buy a signing asking to close the gate gentle???? can you hear the door bell from the door? he might be ringing, not hearing and therefore knocking. In trhe notes section of the be livery page, there is a note section, although there is not 100 per cent these notes would be read as these drivers are constantly rushing.  I did a google search for you, i found this and you can try the envri website Contact Us | Evri   To complain to Evri, you can follow these steps: Contact Customer Service: Call Evri's customer service at 0330 808 5456 for assistance with your complaint.    1 Write a Letter: Address your complaint to Capitol House, 1 Capitol Close, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 0WH.    1 Use the Official Website: Visit the Evri complaints page on their official website for detailed instructions on how to submit a complaint.    2 Email or Call for Specific Issues: For issues like missing or damaged parcels, you can email or call 0800 988 8888, which is free to call.    1 These methods will help you effectively communicate your concerns to Evri.   My driver is called anthony, he is brilliant to be honest. I cant fault him.
    • When I have more time and energy, I will look up the actual number of votes cast for each party in that election, rather than the number of seats won. I'm interested to see that you apparently  think that  Boris Johnson did a good job of "leading the country through Covid." Is your memory really that short? I won't stoop to calling Johnson and his cronies names in the way that you seem to think is appropriate for left wing politicians. At least the left wing politicians have some semblance of morals and a concern for people who aren't in some over privileged inner circle and/or raking in money for themselves on the back of an epidemic. I'm not going to open a can of worms on here  by commenting on the disgraceful so called "purge". 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...