Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 months later...
  • 1 month later...

Passive smoking. Another of the Nanny State's big lies.


Have you been taken in by the lies and obfuscation of the health fascists (who are paid by Big Pharma) to promulgate these falsehoods?


http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100251229/passive-smoking-another-of-the-nanny-states-big-lies/

Roy Castle anyone? I could not go into a pub or club until the smoking was banned because it made me ill. My sinuses would swell up and my eyes would water continuously. I would then have trouble breathing properly. There was no way I was going to live my life on medication for this because it was totally avoidable. So the ban was welcome for me. E-cigs do not affect me...

Also, having a coffee outside a caf? is totally spoiled by chain-smoking twats...mostly foreigners who are still smoking because they were not bombarded with anti-smoking education as we were. This is another health crisis in the UK waiting to happen when they all get copd and lung cancer.

I hope they do prescribe E-cigs on the NHS then at least the government will get the prescription money from it, and the NHS may not crumble and totally die in 20 years time.

And....as for diabetes...why not close down all the unhealthy crappy food shops (you should see the size of school kids who eat this crap) and slap a massive tax on sugar to pay for the NHS?

  • 3 months later...

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> New York Times publish front page editorial for

> first time since 1920's, on the subject of gun

> control.

>

> http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/opinion/end-the-

> gun-epidemic-in-america.html?_r=0


I thoroughly commend the calls for US gun control and would like to think this might make those with the necessary clout over there will take notice, but doubt it. Beyond tragic

  • 1 year later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...