Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 months later...
  • 1 month later...

Passive smoking. Another of the Nanny State's big lies.


Have you been taken in by the lies and obfuscation of the health fascists (who are paid by Big Pharma) to promulgate these falsehoods?


http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100251229/passive-smoking-another-of-the-nanny-states-big-lies/

Roy Castle anyone? I could not go into a pub or club until the smoking was banned because it made me ill. My sinuses would swell up and my eyes would water continuously. I would then have trouble breathing properly. There was no way I was going to live my life on medication for this because it was totally avoidable. So the ban was welcome for me. E-cigs do not affect me...

Also, having a coffee outside a caf? is totally spoiled by chain-smoking twats...mostly foreigners who are still smoking because they were not bombarded with anti-smoking education as we were. This is another health crisis in the UK waiting to happen when they all get copd and lung cancer.

I hope they do prescribe E-cigs on the NHS then at least the government will get the prescription money from it, and the NHS may not crumble and totally die in 20 years time.

And....as for diabetes...why not close down all the unhealthy crappy food shops (you should see the size of school kids who eat this crap) and slap a massive tax on sugar to pay for the NHS?

  • 3 months later...

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> New York Times publish front page editorial for

> first time since 1920's, on the subject of gun

> control.

>

> http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/opinion/end-the-

> gun-epidemic-in-america.html?_r=0


I thoroughly commend the calls for US gun control and would like to think this might make those with the necessary clout over there will take notice, but doubt it. Beyond tragic

  • 1 year later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...