Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Beware! A man rang the door bell on Friday telling me about a problem with my roof which I know about. The email address on the website is fake and the landline is actually a mobile. I got caught because the man did the work while I was out then demanded to be paid in cash. He was pretty threatening and he was with another man. He is supposed to have come to finish the work today and remove his ladders but hasn't been which makes me nervous. He claims to be called Johnny and is Irish.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/106709-rogue-roofers/
Share on other sites

This very much sounds like the gentleman who extorted ?1000's out of an elderly neighbour of ours. Same MO and description. He charged way over the odds for very little work and kept on coming back for more money. I called the police as soon as I found out about it. I know they visited the culprit and got some money back for our neighbour. But the police said it was a job for Trading Standards. The man needs stopping.

I called the police but they were not interested. However, the lady at Trading standards has been brilliant and she has involved the police.

The man who knocks on the door is about 6' tall, early 50s, Irish and is rather threatening. The man who works with him is in his 20s, about 5'9, less fair skinned than the Irish one, dark hair and a moustache. The Irishman claims he's called Johnny and the young one calls himself John or Jonathan. They drive an old blue flatbed lorry.

Could these be the same people: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?30,1666596,1666596#msg-1666596


Might be worth collating information to give to trading standards. There is definitely a crime number from when we reported this to the police. I'm happy to share information by PM.


James

first mate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Doesn't this constitute some sort of trespass and

> criminal damage to property? Signalto that is

> awful, I feel very sorry for you.



I think once any money has been exchanged, then it's considered an informal contract. Police refer people to Trading Standards.


However, perhaps if enough people continue to report it to the police, a better criminal case can be built? I agree that it should be considered trespass and criminal damage.


Imagine if you climbed up on the roof of Parliament and removed the gutters, then demanded money?! Hmmm, actually with a fluorescent vest, a clipboard, and a ream of meaningless paperwork, you could probably make an expenses claim... :-/

Saffron, or when someone's car was parked you told the owner their wheels needed fixing and then when they were out if sight you removed the wheels putting only three back, telling the unwitting owner on their return that they now owed you money....or else. Isn't that extortion as well? Three crimes then?
There isn't any such thing as an informal contract. You either have a contract or not. This sounds like trespass, criminal damage and potentially extortion. Be insistent with the police. Point out that they did not have your permission to be on the property, and that you feel threatened by their demands (assuming both of those things are true of course).

English case law does appear to support non-written contracts as enforceable where acceptance has been given, in this case money. I'm not saying I concur, simply that this may be the premise under which the police initially turn away such complaints.


I think this is clearly criminal behaviour on many counts, but it may take strenuous complaints to get police action.


I think don't even engage these criminals in any way, even if they are on your property. Phone the police and report it as a crime in progress.


Of course it's very easy to be caught off one's guard, and easy to look back and say things could have been done differently. So, all-in-all it's good to hear that you weren't physically hurt S. Hopefully the police will take this seriously if you persist. xx

To have a contract you need agreement (usually described in terms of offer and acceptance), consideration (which is a legal term basically meaning that you need to change your position in some way, like making payment) and intention to create legal relations (meaning you intended to be legally bound by your promises).


There are a couple of instances where you have to have a written contract like land dealings but otherwise there is no presribed form.


Some con artist turning up on your doorstep and doing work to your property without your prior agreement is not a contract.

This story almost identically matches what happened to friends of mine near the end of last year/beginning this year. They are in Deptford on the border of Brockley and Lewisham. They seemed to think that this man targets women/elderly as he perceives them as more susceptible to his 'advice'. But initially they agreed to his fee because they had planned on getting work to the gutters done anyway. Once he started work he kept telling them more and more had to be done and he became threatening when they said they didn't want him to do any more work. He then left without putting up new guttering, and refused to take down the scaffolding unless they paid him even more money. In the end they had the locks changed because they were so threatened by him and he had had access to their house. Awful!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...