Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Beware! A man rang the door bell on Friday telling me about a problem with my roof which I know about. The email address on the website is fake and the landline is actually a mobile. I got caught because the man did the work while I was out then demanded to be paid in cash. He was pretty threatening and he was with another man. He is supposed to have come to finish the work today and remove his ladders but hasn't been which makes me nervous. He claims to be called Johnny and is Irish.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/106709-rogue-roofers/
Share on other sites

This very much sounds like the gentleman who extorted ?1000's out of an elderly neighbour of ours. Same MO and description. He charged way over the odds for very little work and kept on coming back for more money. I called the police as soon as I found out about it. I know they visited the culprit and got some money back for our neighbour. But the police said it was a job for Trading Standards. The man needs stopping.

I called the police but they were not interested. However, the lady at Trading standards has been brilliant and she has involved the police.

The man who knocks on the door is about 6' tall, early 50s, Irish and is rather threatening. The man who works with him is in his 20s, about 5'9, less fair skinned than the Irish one, dark hair and a moustache. The Irishman claims he's called Johnny and the young one calls himself John or Jonathan. They drive an old blue flatbed lorry.

Could these be the same people: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?30,1666596,1666596#msg-1666596


Might be worth collating information to give to trading standards. There is definitely a crime number from when we reported this to the police. I'm happy to share information by PM.


James

first mate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Doesn't this constitute some sort of trespass and

> criminal damage to property? Signalto that is

> awful, I feel very sorry for you.



I think once any money has been exchanged, then it's considered an informal contract. Police refer people to Trading Standards.


However, perhaps if enough people continue to report it to the police, a better criminal case can be built? I agree that it should be considered trespass and criminal damage.


Imagine if you climbed up on the roof of Parliament and removed the gutters, then demanded money?! Hmmm, actually with a fluorescent vest, a clipboard, and a ream of meaningless paperwork, you could probably make an expenses claim... :-/

Saffron, or when someone's car was parked you told the owner their wheels needed fixing and then when they were out if sight you removed the wheels putting only three back, telling the unwitting owner on their return that they now owed you money....or else. Isn't that extortion as well? Three crimes then?
There isn't any such thing as an informal contract. You either have a contract or not. This sounds like trespass, criminal damage and potentially extortion. Be insistent with the police. Point out that they did not have your permission to be on the property, and that you feel threatened by their demands (assuming both of those things are true of course).

English case law does appear to support non-written contracts as enforceable where acceptance has been given, in this case money. I'm not saying I concur, simply that this may be the premise under which the police initially turn away such complaints.


I think this is clearly criminal behaviour on many counts, but it may take strenuous complaints to get police action.


I think don't even engage these criminals in any way, even if they are on your property. Phone the police and report it as a crime in progress.


Of course it's very easy to be caught off one's guard, and easy to look back and say things could have been done differently. So, all-in-all it's good to hear that you weren't physically hurt S. Hopefully the police will take this seriously if you persist. xx

To have a contract you need agreement (usually described in terms of offer and acceptance), consideration (which is a legal term basically meaning that you need to change your position in some way, like making payment) and intention to create legal relations (meaning you intended to be legally bound by your promises).


There are a couple of instances where you have to have a written contract like land dealings but otherwise there is no presribed form.


Some con artist turning up on your doorstep and doing work to your property without your prior agreement is not a contract.

This story almost identically matches what happened to friends of mine near the end of last year/beginning this year. They are in Deptford on the border of Brockley and Lewisham. They seemed to think that this man targets women/elderly as he perceives them as more susceptible to his 'advice'. But initially they agreed to his fee because they had planned on getting work to the gutters done anyway. Once he started work he kept telling them more and more had to be done and he became threatening when they said they didn't want him to do any more work. He then left without putting up new guttering, and refused to take down the scaffolding unless they paid him even more money. In the end they had the locks changed because they were so threatened by him and he had had access to their house. Awful!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Your post was an attack on the tax   I didn’t  address or mention you in my reply. Just pointed  out the problems with the article you then told be I wasn’t invited.  In no way am I bullying anyone. The reverse is true if anything 
    • The problem is, I'm not sure what the going rate is for park land for festivals of this nature. I'm sure they are paying less than outfits pay for access to the big stadia - but these have better facilities and are normally better for public transport. I am also sure that Councils could press for more, and should do so, but of course there isn't really a shortage of council lands to exploit, so these entrepreneurs could go elsewhere. What I would like to know is how much of the suggested £440,000 this year for Southwark is net profit - what are their costs in getting and administering this let? If this is a gross figure then what do they actually have as 'surplus'? But at least we have a starting point now - even if it's a guess I'm thinking it's a reasonably informed one.
    • Looks like owner of Persepolis is opening something late summer in what was The dulwich Beer Dispensary spot…  Excited about that  
    • All I've done is post a link and you're straight on the attack, for heavens sake. And as sarky as ever. This isn't solely your forum and you don't rule the roost so stop trying to dictate and bully me.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...