Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So. Something happened to me for the first time in about 10 years today. I was walking down Lordship Lane, on my way to Green & Blue, when a van full of builders drove past and started woolf whistling and yelling and generally making cheeky comments at me. I was so surprised that I just burst out laughing!


So now I wonder - should I have laughed? Or should I have been offended? Is that a degrading/offensive way to treat women, or was it just high spirits?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10819-whistle-while-you-work/
Share on other sites

How did you feel? There's no reaction that is 'right' or 'wrong' - its how you felt that is important..... if you laughed out loud, perhaps you felt maybe a little flattered? Certainly doesn't seem to be a response of someone who was offended or degraded. Boys in work vans behave in a way they would never behave in their own private cars. In their works van, male bravado and testosterone sometimes takes over....
I didn't feel flattered particularly, just, well, surprised! Perhaps Peckham Rose is right and I should just enjoy laughing in the sunshine. (Though my brother in law is a builder and he'd yell at just about anything remotely female, so Brum your testosterone point may well be valid!)

Well Swagger, going through your list, and as far as memory serves:


Did the van have a mobile number written on the side instead of a landline? Yes

Had some cheeky sods etched "also available in white" into the grime on the back door? Yes!

Was the drivers view obstructed by an enormous accumulation of Ginsters pastie wrappers? Yes, and there were cans too

Did the vehicle leave the unmistakable stench of marijuana in its wake? No

Was one or more of the passengers east european (usually identified by their mono-brow)? I did spot a monobrow

Did you notice a tattoo on any of the passengers necks? No

Was an England flag hanging off the end of their ladder? No

Did they address you as darlin'? Yes. A lot.

Did you notice any cash changing hands? No

And last but not least. Was the vehicle taxed? I didn't see, so we'll say no.


So I think I score 5, making me yelled at by not real builders, but just casuals.


But what does this mean? Should I have laughed more, or less? Or been more or less offended? I didn't realise there were grades of heckle, you see. Please advise.

Swagger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Had some cheeky sods etched "also available in

> white" into the grime on the back door?


-------------------------------------------------------


The funniest thing that I've seen written into the grime on a white van was "I wish my wife was as dirty as this van"

You must have been looking rather formy legalbegal for the builders to bother, though after all it's spring innit.


They would be friskier, more fun, and straighter dealing,


than any sleezy,


pizza smelling,


lawyer that I've known or used.


Current lawdogs excepted of course.

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> now I don't even get tradesman !

>

> Does that mean noone even uses uses your tradesman

> entrance anymore?



This is the second thread I've had to say this on: Do behave! This is not a Carry On film! And there I was thinking I'd get lots of responses about objectifying women and equality of the sexes.


Sigh.

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

And there

> I was thinking I'd get lots of responses about

> objectifying women and equality of the sexes.


Might have to head to the Drawing Room for that - just make sure you don't "fisk" though;-)

Hmm legalbeagle, I'm generally of the opinion that the sort of man who shouts at a woman from a moving vehicle / overhead scaffolding / outside a pub with his mates is the kind of tiny-dicked-can't-get-it-up type who's never likely to get a girlfriend.


And of course it's entirely unacceptable that they should feel entitled to comment on your appearance in that way. However the unpalatable truth is that sometimes for some people it is vaguely flattering to be on the receiving end of a wolf whistle. I am a card-carrying feminist, but even I have been known once or twice to smile when I've thought I wasn't looking all that, and someone else has, erm, expressed their appreciation.


The problem is that it's a fine fine line, and even though I smiled, I'd say it's categorically unacceptable to heckle strangers in the street. It is objectification and that's not ok. But as to whether you should have felt offended - I think that's a matter for you - depends on your mood at the time really, and certainly don't let anyone tell you how you should or shouldn't feel. Although maybe pity for their tiny penises would have been the apposite emotion.

RosieH does make a good point on the "getting a girlfriend" question. Has it ever ever worked for anyone ever that they've heckled a stranger and pulled as a result? I think the answer is probably in the negative. In which case, why bother?


Or is that not the point?

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmm legalbeagle, I'm generally of the opinion that

> the sort of man who shouts at a woman from a

> moving vehicle / overhead scaffolding / outside a

> pub with his mates is the kind of

> tiny-dicked-can't-get-it-up type who's never

> likely to get a girlfriend.

>

> And of course it's entirely unacceptable that they

> should feel entitled to comment on your appearance

> in that way. However the unpalatable truth is

> that sometimes for some people it is vaguely

> flattering to be on the receiving end of a wolf

> whistle. I am a card-carrying feminist, but even I

> have been known once or twice to smile when I've

> thought I wasn't looking all that, and someone

> else has, erm, expressed their appreciation.

>

> The problem is that it's a fine fine line, and

> even though I smiled, I'd say it's categorically

> unacceptable to heckle strangers in the street. It

> is objectification and that's not ok. But as to

> whether you should have felt offended - I think

> that's a matter for you - depends on your mood at

> the time really, and certainly don't let anyone

> tell you how you should or shouldn't feel.

> Although maybe pity for their tiny penises would

> have been the apposite emotion.

____________________________________________________________________________


Yes...


But does my bum look big in this ?




W**F

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ... And with a graceful little skip, Swagger

> crosses the line.


And all of a sudden I feel I've heard that voice before. Naughty Swagger. Just a tiny bit too confident to be the newbie he appears to be?!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
    • Before voting, do you not think it's logical to evaluate each party on its policies and make a tally of the reasons "For" and "Against" voting for each party.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...