Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dear all


It is proposed that, in light of the forthcoming General Election, a series of debates will take place within the confines of the Drawing Room that each Prospective Parliamentary Candidate (PPC) will take part in. I have, in principle, obtained the participation of Tessa Jowell and am currently contacting the other major parties with expectations of their inclusion.


I propose that the debates shall run according to the following guidelines:


1) Questions to be put to the candidates should be PM'd to the Chair

2) Prospective questions will be vetted and a shortlist drawn-up. Expectations are of approx. 6 questions.

3) These (identical) questions will be put to each candidate via a private email and each candidate will be given 3 days to respond.

4) Answers will be posted in a separate thread for each party.

5) Follow-up questions and/or supplementaries can then be submitted via that thread in a free, but heavily moderated, manner.

6) PPC involvement in the subsequent questions will be at their discretion. The Chair asks for understanding that these are busy people with campaigns to run and that they may not be able to dedicate large amounts of time to subsequent debates.


I hope that these debates will be illuminating and educational. We at the EDF have a great chance to participate directly in democratic debate in one of the most closely fought elections in recent history. I hope people will respect this opportunity.


Comments below can be used for discussion of the method of debate but please PM any questions you have for the PPCs to the Chair directly.


Regards.

Whilst I appreciate that some residents of SE22 will be voting in a different constituency, logistically it would be difficult to accomodate another 4+ candidates into the debate. If however any of the candidates for Dulwich and Norwood decline or are unable to take part I will endeavour to invite their Camberwell & Peckham counterparts.


The criteria for vetting the questions is arbitary. I do not have specific criteria other than that the questions are sensible, intelligent and will provoke debate. I have set a provisional limit of six per candidate to try and cover a few topics but to try and keep some degree of brevity. I feel it only fair that candidates are allowed to answer their questions in secret but may consider allowing personalised rather than identical questions for each candidate.


Moderation of the follow-up debates will be more vigorous than normal. This is because I want to ensure that all candidates are respected and that the contributions are valid. This is not Question Time, I am not David Dimbleby and hopefully the readers of the EDF are more intelligent than the average studio audience.

???? - a valid point. I shall try to ensure there is at least a local flavour to the questions submitted. First and foremost these people should be constituency MPs and their work in the local community should not be down-played in favour of national issues.


Silverfox - thanks for highlighting this. To allow for debate afterwards I shall set a provisional deadline of Monday 19th. Should insufficient questions have been submitted this could be flexible.

Questions have now been sent to all four candidates to answer. The questions are:


1) Should MP's live in the constituency they represent?


2) What is the fairest way of capping individuals annual earnings i.e Bob Diamond ?63 million at Barclays?


3) Do you accept that whilst the crime solving benefits of surveillance are considerable, there must surely be a level at which the costs to an individual's privacy and sense of freedom outweigh the potential benefits?


4)Could the candidates please outline how they intend to offer this area (East Dulwich, Nunhead and the wider Southwark/South East London area) better transport links to other parts of London. Although I realise the Mayor has overall responsibility for transport in London, do any of the parliamentary or council candidates have a view/ have plans to propose measures to improve the connections between South East London and the rest of the city?


5)I would like to ask the candidates what they would do to ensure that all local children can go to good local state primary and seconday schools (with the emphasis on good as well as local).


6)Should the government departments treat humanist, secular and religious organisations equally in policy making, funding decisions and consultations?


These are an amalgamation of different questions and themes that were submitted and I would like to thank all of those that did so. Apologies if yours didn't make the final cut.


Let's hope for some interesting answers.


The Chair.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Chair - have you given them a deadline and/or can

> all the replies be posted simultaneously?. I guess

> If I was them I might be tempted to wait until I

> saw what others had to say and comment etc. before

> posting my own.


I agree ???? but it's very hard to do otherwise. I have asked all the candidates to try and post by Friday night so hopefully by Monday we should have all four.


As for waiting till the other candidates have been... well shall just have to live with it. I'm hoping we just get their opinion rather than an opportunity for point scoring.


Ho-hum.


And thanks all for the kind words of support.

Ok this is clearly a great idea. But I'm guessing The Chair is not a journalist. Those questions are dire. Particularly the one about privacy and that. It's a closed question. Similarly the one about capping pay. Perhaps one or more canididates thinks there is no limit to the amount of pay one should be allowed to earn.

I'm not giving my view on the answers to the questions, but they are not good questions. There' kjillions of media living in east dulwich these days, couldn't The Chair have asked one or more of them for advice?

er, these arent journalistic questions, they are from the people of the EDF. They're about engagement rather than a quick answer so I don't think we'll get closed Answers. eg the capping they could answer "Well we don't believe that the state should have a say on how much businesses pay their employees etc etc. It's not a press conference...I disagree and say well done chair. They may choose to answer them in a closed manner but don't think they'll get many votes on that basis

The Chair did not write the questions. The Chair's profession is not relevant.


Jamma did not submit any questions. Nor did any "media types" volunteer their free time and energy in setting this up.


The candidates can answer the questions as they see fit and can choose to participate, or not, in the subsequent discussions.


I think that's all that needs saying.

There appears to be a distinct lack of engagement on the edf's behalf.


I'm amazed that given the views often expressed on here about the difficulties of getting children into schools (see family room) and the pros and cons of funding faith schools Tessa's replies have gone unchallenged.


The silence from the edf is a bit of an insult to a busy politician who has taken time out from a hectic schedule to answer our questions.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you for the detailed advise @trinidad It is definitely damage we are concerned about. I don’t think Evri would agree to pay the bill to fix our gate or letter box if they were to be damaged as a result of their delivery drivers helper. Our doorbell can be heard from outside when rung so we don’t quite believe the aggressive simultaneous door/letter box banging is necessary. It can be quite a shock it is done very aggressively.  I’ll definitely action the steps you’ve kindly provided along with a phone call tomorrow. I do sympathise with the role drivers have and how busy they are, which is why we tried communicating directly with her but sadly we haven’t succeeded 
    • What outcome would you like? Disciplinary action? Not to have the driver back? Retraining? I know there is alot of pressure on drivers to deliver within a set day. if he slams the gate, is it evidence he is causing damage, or is the noise a irritant to yourself? You could put a sign up or buy a signing asking to close the gate gentle???? can you hear the door bell from the door? he might be ringing, not hearing and therefore knocking. In trhe notes section of the be livery page, there is a note section, although there is not 100 per cent these notes would be read as these drivers are constantly rushing.  I did a google search for you, i found this and you can try the envri website Contact Us | Evri   To complain to Evri, you can follow these steps: Contact Customer Service: Call Evri's customer service at 0330 808 5456 for assistance with your complaint.    1 Write a Letter: Address your complaint to Capitol House, 1 Capitol Close, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 0WH.    1 Use the Official Website: Visit the Evri complaints page on their official website for detailed instructions on how to submit a complaint.    2 Email or Call for Specific Issues: For issues like missing or damaged parcels, you can email or call 0800 988 8888, which is free to call.    1 These methods will help you effectively communicate your concerns to Evri.   My driver is called anthony, he is brilliant to be honest. I cant fault him.
    • When I have more time and energy, I will look up the actual number of votes cast for each party in that election, rather than the number of seats won. I'm interested to see that you apparently  think that  Boris Johnson did a good job of "leading the country through Covid." Is your memory really that short? I won't stoop to calling Johnson and his cronies names in the way that you seem to think is appropriate for left wing politicians. At least the left wing politicians have some semblance of morals and a concern for people who aren't in some over privileged inner circle and/or raking in money for themselves on the back of an epidemic. I'm not going to open a can of worms on here  by commenting on the disgraceful so called "purge". 
    • Can’t imagine what it must be like you have your doorbell rung harshly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...