Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm sure if the owner approached us without being confrontational, we could move out.


But if we have the property for a few months before being approached by the owners, we would be less reluctant to give up the house, due to the fact that the owners have shown lack of interest in the property.


We are reasonable people and aren't going out of our way too intentionally ruin home owners lives.


The house is now full and no more spaces are available.


Thanks again for your support.

The Goose Green Squatters. x

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> goosegreenteam Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > We will have to see how we are approached by

> the

> > owners, if they are forcefull and agressive

> then

> > we will be less reluctant to cooperate.

>

> And that's where you lose my sympathy! But

> hopefully it won't come to that.



Less reluctant to cooperate - do you mean more reluctant?

Goosegreenteam

You say you could move out if the owner was not confrontational?

But will you without making a fuss?

I'm sure you are aware that taking over someone's house is just a teansy bit confrontational in itself and now you are expecting the owner to be nice about it. Is that fair?

So goose green squatters - please could you tell me why you choose to squat though? Thats what I find interesting.


I personally knew someone who became a squatter - he was from a mega-privileged background (yes, I DO know not all are!) and he seemed to enjoy being a 'rebel' and anti-establishment - IMHO probably due to the fact the hardest decision he'd ever made in his 25 years was which cigar cutter to buy for daddy's birthday pressie.


You say you're good at DIY? Any good with fence panels? :)

Although there are a lot of horro stories that come with squatters, I believe they can be beneficial. In amsterdam ther is a system where squatting is encouraged in empty buildings but under given conditions where the squatter agrees to caretake the building and give it back in good condition, when the owner needs it back, if they stick to the agreement they are offered another place to stay ensuring low homelessness for the squatter and building kept safe for owner. I believe this could work in london too, saving property owners the agro and expense of eviction procedings and dealing with homelessness and wanton vandalism of property by careless squatters. I hope they are kind for the owners sake and happy to negotiate an easy exit when the property is wanted back, unfortunatley alot of owners fear the worst when squatters get in, and go in all guns blazing rather than have a freindly chat with the occupants, there by getting hackles up and a confontation nearly always ensues. I have know quite alot of squatters and on the whole they are usually creative eco concious and pretty kind people albeit skint.


huggs

davidhealy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I love all this liberal bull!

>

> Lets just see how any one of you would react if

> you came home and it was your home invaded. Its

> all very well pontificating but the real reaction

> would be far different!

>

> I invite the owner of the property to come on here

> and discuss??

>

> Suppose you want Clegg as your next prime minister

> too - lets really get the UK back on its feet ...

> dear god!

>

> Blue all the way.

____________________________________


Really..?


I suspect RED ( from the neck up )



W**F

Hee hee.


I love crazy squatter logic: "if we have the property for a few months before being approached by the owners, we would be [more] reluctant to give up the house"


I can almost see your eyes crossing as you say it ;-)


So, I can just take my neighbour's car can I, if they don't drive it enough?


And if they haven't driven it for a while then it's really mine?


Anyway, come on mate, 'reluctant to give up the house'? By saying that you already accept the house isn't yours. What you're really doing is taking it with threats of violence. If you think you can use euphemisms and they're clever coz you can't prove nuffink, you must take us all for idiots.


If that were true, it wouldn't make us the idiots.

Firstly...


I am all for squatting a disused building however, were the owner to approach you to move out on an agreed date or after an agreed period following a court action, would you be looking for "compensation" of some kind


Of course you are not actively doing this for cash, but would it "oil the wheels" somewhat


Lastly, whose broadband are you using ( are you close enough to pick up the free EDT network ? )



W**F

It's anarchy, I say.. anarchy!


I was planning on booking a holiday, but now I can't - for fear of returning to discover that a troupe of white, dreadlocked vegetarian lesbians from the home counties have moved in, changed the locks and painted an enormous rainbow mural on side return wall.

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Either it's broadband from EDT, Woof, or they can

> afford iPhones with all the money they save from

> not paying their way!



yeah cos there's no way that students could have any other access to the internet is there?

The house is rotting around the windows quite a lot, causing some problems by making the house really cold. The house is in a state but we are using our DIY skills to bring the house back to life. We feel like we've been cleaning forever.


We have gained internet by using a modern tactic, mobile 'dongle' broadband.


We feel that people are generalising squatters a bit too much. We don't want to get into a political debate about the pros and cons of squatting. We just want to live here peacefully until we are moved on, when it comes to the time when the owner has the eviction order, we will leave peacefully.


If you would like to find out more about squatting check out http://www.squatter.org.uk/


Thanks to all our supporters.

The Goose Green Squatters. x

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thanks to all for the comments and advice.  I have now reported the incident to the police.
    • Thanks everyone for your comments, all of which I’ve taken something from. I originally posted to warn and help others learn from my experience – hence the title, first and last words of the post. However, the process of posting and reading your comments has helped me better make sense of what felt ‘off’ about the incident, why and what I’d do differently next time. I hadn’t expected this outcome, so thank you.  It’s also yielded several ‘golden nugget’ insights, one of which I share here for others. For context, I’m a longtime SE22 resident, who lives on a street with a primary school, so am used to scooting, cycling, walking with buggies, small children, pets etc. I like where I live and have never been struck on a pavement by anyone, on wheels or otherwise. I’ve been fortunate. When walking down Carlton Avenue towards Dulwich Village yesterday, I was on the left-hand side of the pavement but – ‘golden nugget’ approaching – not as close to people’s front garden walls as I could have been. The cyclist came from behind and overtook on the inside i.e. passed between me and the wall. The gap was too narrow and he hit my leg. For clarity, my original post was about the lack of adult supervision of a child. There’s been much comment here about the cyclist’s age. I didn’t know he was 4, until his father told me. I felt that this was a tactic – along with telling me I was over-reacting, talking about intent, apologising undercut with ‘but’ and laughing – to downplay and avoid taking responsibility for his part in the situation. But I accept that is my perception, readers weren’t there and may think differently. What also felt ‘off’ is that the father didn’t see what happened or ask any questions to find out. What happened? Where did he hit you? How hard? Are you alright? Is my son alright? Is everyone alright? This sounds obvious but wasn’t to me until last night. Back to age. Is the age of the cyclist important? If you consider it from the perspective of a four-year-old, it might be. He’s on his bike, helmet on, speeding along, sees a gap and thinks he can get through it. He doesn’t know and/or may never have been told about the risks (to himself and others) of undertaking on the left. Hits pedestrian. I was not expecting to be hit from behind or the undertaking. But had I walked closer to the wall – and not left a potentially inviting gap – this probably wouldn’t have happened. This is just one ‘golden nugget’ I will take away. It’s something I can easily do, doesn’t depend on anyone else doing anything differently, and could contribute towards keeping myself and others safe. All in all, posting here has been unexpectedly useful for me. I hope for others, too. I feel able to move forward with learnings, so thank you guys.
    • Scorpio Dry Cleaners (in the parade of shops at the top of Herne Hill) has closed. The shopfront is being renovated and will be reopened as therapy rooms by Herne Hill Space.  I take this as evidence that we're all more stressed than before, despite being more casually dressed...
    • They do often have very small turning circles (is that the correct term?)  though. Many many moons ago I won a very long Volvo estate car. It could get into a space not much longer than itself, which  was impressive!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...