Jump to content

Recommended Posts

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the 1730 from LB yesterday stopped at South Berm

> for about 12 mins, the driver seemed to be saying

> it's scheduled.


It's part of Southern Rails keep fit 'Walk and Ride' scheme.

12 mins wait means you can get off the train at South Berm walk to Queens Road Peckham where you rejoin the train..


It's brilliant


Foxy

mikeb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've completely written off East and North Dulwich

> stations, now using Denmark Hill and Forest Hill

> plus cycling / running and buses. I think

> September will see the real impact of the

> timetable


Yeah, 1 token train an hour is barely worth the effort. They may as well just close the station until this is sorted.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why don't Southern just stop running trains and

> allow people to walk and cycle along the tracks?


Or like this maybe....


http://trainfanatics.com/go-karts-abandoned-railroad-tracks/

Gilloc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Where can you find copy of old train times to

> claim against does anyone know?



If you poke about on the national rail website it has historic data for train journeys actual and scheduled and a rate times. It doesn't go back that far though.

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Gilloc Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Where can you find copy of old train times to

> > claim against does anyone know?

>

>

> If you poke about on the national rail website it

> has historic data for train journeys actual and

> scheduled and a rate times. It doesn't go back

> that far though.



This site goes back three months http://www.recenttraintimes.co.uk

Not sure how relevant this is with people who have year passes etc, but a fellow student from college has developed a phone application which helps you get repaid from delayed trains. Not used it myself as I'm biking most places now, but there's a better write up here:

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/techandgadgets/student-launches-app-to-claim-compensation-for-delayed-rail-passengers-a3304466.html

The problem is that a lot of people use pay as you go and an app for train arrivals. If you see that the train is cancelled you go a different route but then don't have a ticket for the ED - LB route as you haven't swiped in at ED. My understanding of this (unless I'm wrong) is that you wouldn't be eligible for compensation (despite the fact that a bus plus train alternative may cost more. Ideally I'd like to be claiming compensation from Southern every day for the fact that there is virtually no service from ED, but don't think I'm eligible unless someone else can tell me otherwise?
I was also going to ask how the trains from Peckham Rye to Blackfriars have been in the mornings? Starting new job tomorrow and need to arrive at 1000; so don't want to be late. Have they been delayed? Journey takes 15 mins but I was thinking of leaving an hour to spare just in case in the inevitable happens...

dirac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was also going to ask how the trains from

> Peckham Rye to Blackfriars have been in the

> mornings? Starting new job tomorrow and need to

> arrive at 1000; so don't want to be late. Have

> they been delayed? Journey takes 15 mins but I was

> thinking of leaving an hour to spare just in case

> in the inevitable happens...


Delays of a few minutes are common, cancellations not that rare. It's not as bad as the trains into London bridge but it's bad enough I use the 63 to go all the way to work a lot of the time. However, I live a mile and half from the station and get on the 63 or 363 to get to the station anyway, and so I resent getting off the bus to get on a crowded train which could then be delayed. I would feel different if I was a short walk to the station.


If you have to be in for 10 it shouldn't be too bad as there's a few different ones not long after 9 and you'd often get a seat that time of morning too. The ones before 9 are overcrowded.

indiepanda - I've found there's been lots more cancellations on the Blackfriars / Thameslink trains over the past month than there ever were before. It's well worth checking the train tracker app for up to the minute info in the morning. That said, when it works, it's a good line if you can get on - particularly if you start at 10 when you should be able to miss the worst of the rush hour crush.

Forgive me if this has already been covered or isn't relevant, as I haven't read the whole thread, but I got a survey form through my door today soliciting views on cancelling the Southern Railway franchise (I do realise the thread is on train cancellations and not the franchise!)


Helen Hayes (MP) is apparently calling for Southern's franchise to be cancelled as a matter of urgency, and I guess the survey results would help bring this about.


I'm not filling it in because I very rarely use trains these days and haven't experienced any problems, but if you do and you haven't received the survey form, you might want to contact them. It only gives an address, which is East Dulwich Labour Action Team, 264 Rosendale Road, London SE24 9DL, but it is easy to contact MPs online.

The Govt is to blame for this.

They privatised railways, they offer the franchises, so they are responsible to ensure the service is delivered.

They have failed to ensure this. While Southern execs and 'consultants' line their pockets, the passenger gets a reduced service and the Govt says it's out of their hands, because some company is 'responsible' for providing the service. Pure negligence of successive, spineless, Govts.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Govt is to blame for this.

> They privatised railways, they offer the

> franchises, so they are responsible to ensure the

> service is delivered.

> They have failed to ensure this. While Southern

> execs and 'consultants' line their pockets, the

> passenger gets a reduced service and the Govt says

> it's out of their hands, because some company is

> 'responsible' for providing the service. Pure

> negligence of successive, spineless, Govts.



Well privatisation is always going to put profit for the few above the needs of the many using the service, isn't it.


The old British Rail may have had its faults but nothing like what we've got now.


The only hope is if Labour get in, but what a terrible mess they will have to sort out in renationalising the rail system.

We all agree that East Dulwich / London Bridge service is a disgraceful non-service. The so-called temporary timetable is a cynical way for Southern to appear to be running a more reliable service. They are so pathetic, however, that they fail even to deliver this timetable; and, in particular to operate the handful of trains that are supposed to run between 06.30 and 09.00.


Despite all the complaints, public petitions, interventions from MPs, the Mayor and media coverage .... nothing happens! Why? The Government is 100% to blame for allowing Southern to continue this farce - they awarded a long-term franchise with pathetic, inadequate sanctions in place for non-performance. Therefore, Southern aren't suffering any significant financial pain for the misery they are imposing on us! Meanwhile, the Government sheds crocodile tears but finds the money to push ahead with the HS2 vanity project: ?90 billion 'down the drain' and counting! They should invest that money instead in much needed improvements to the existing UK rail system.


The last Rail Minister, Claire Perry, resigned after failing to tackle the current mess. BUT WHAT ACTION IS THE GOVERNMENT TAKING NOW TO END THE MISERY THAT IS SOUTHERN RAIL?!?!?!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They clearly don’t.  I would expect better from the council.  Rather dismally, it sounds like any complaints or requests just fall on deaf ears.
    • No, because they are a business and their job is to make a profit. It is the local council, on our behalf, who should be giving regard to the environment. Gala, not unreasonably, might take the view that it is the council's role to protect the environment of Southwark, and if they have no objection to this scheme then frankly why shouldn't they (Gala) go ahead? And the council also seems to take the view that they are focused on revenue and not the environment. Otherwise they might listen to the environmental pleas here. The mistake you are making is assuming that either party to this transaction (we are clearly only bystanders) gives a flying fig for the environment when there is money in the offing.
    • It struck me last year that any dialogue with Gala themselves e.g. at the box-ticking "Community Engagement Sessions" is completely pointless, as they are just a business trying to do whatever is necessary to hold their event; the park is just a venue to them, a necessary facility, and they'll say anything to secure it. They don't care about it's welfare or upkeep, over and above making sure there's no complaints big enough to prevent them using it again. I've found that discussing issues with them has just led to them using that info to counteract that issue - effectively helping them strengthen their position. What I find frustrating is that the council, despite being the body that decides on this, and should be representing local residents, takes no active part in any discussions or presentations, so there's no way to engage with them apart from an online consultation which is clearly also a box ticking exercise, bearing in mind for the last two years the overwhelming majority (97% of respondents) objected to the event. Why are Gala running the community meetings? Why do Gala run the issue hotline? If the council really care about the park and the surrounding community, and still allow this type of event, they should be way more hands on with taking responsibility for it's running, not just handing it all over to a profit making company.  Sorry, probably tldr but so sad about the repeated negative impact on our (once beautiful & peaceful) park and just exasperated that there's so little that can be done to halt it. This is just the start, it WILL turn into another Brockwell Park, and Gala & the council just don't care.
    • We used these guys for our underfloor heating, their heating engineer Sam was excellent. Very reassuring and sorted it all out properly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...